beatledog7
Member
I have two advanced degrees and am a Political Science professor. What wannbe's teacher did was wrong in lots of ways, as has been discussed.
I certainly do control the debate in my classroom, but only in the sense that I sometimes must make small adjustments to guide it along a balanced path or even call a halt if it threatens to get out of control. As long as nobody gets emotional or personal, I allow spirited debate and encourage differing opinions. So yeah, the teacher has to play the role of moderator.
Personal freedom versus centralized control comes up in many contexts, and my students know they are free to express their reasoned opinions. I find I can keep things rational and calm by enforcing a single rule: before a student expresses his or her view, he or she must summarize or restate to my satisfaction the previously expressed position. If a student can do that, he or she demonstrates clarity of thought and the ability to see both sides of a debate. Both are exremely valuable in real education.
My students are pleased that they get as much latitude as they do to openly disagree with each other and even with the textbook author's position. I sometimes decline to express my own position but instead encourage them to focus on reaching their own rational conclusions. They know early on that regarding any multifaceted topic, agreeing with me is not going to help their grade, and disagreeing with me won't hurt it, as long as they can support what they think with a rational argument.
The classroom is about the students and their opportunity to explore a subject. It is not about the man or woman whose name headlines the syllabus, regardless of his or her position on gun control.
I certainly do control the debate in my classroom, but only in the sense that I sometimes must make small adjustments to guide it along a balanced path or even call a halt if it threatens to get out of control. As long as nobody gets emotional or personal, I allow spirited debate and encourage differing opinions. So yeah, the teacher has to play the role of moderator.
Personal freedom versus centralized control comes up in many contexts, and my students know they are free to express their reasoned opinions. I find I can keep things rational and calm by enforcing a single rule: before a student expresses his or her view, he or she must summarize or restate to my satisfaction the previously expressed position. If a student can do that, he or she demonstrates clarity of thought and the ability to see both sides of a debate. Both are exremely valuable in real education.
My students are pleased that they get as much latitude as they do to openly disagree with each other and even with the textbook author's position. I sometimes decline to express my own position but instead encourage them to focus on reaching their own rational conclusions. They know early on that regarding any multifaceted topic, agreeing with me is not going to help their grade, and disagreeing with me won't hurt it, as long as they can support what they think with a rational argument.
The classroom is about the students and their opportunity to explore a subject. It is not about the man or woman whose name headlines the syllabus, regardless of his or her position on gun control.