From my experience, 70' is too close for 90% of wild animals not to mention one as powerful as a bear. But to say that someone deserved it or that it was justice is not something I would ever pass judgement on (except Grizzly Man).
Everyone makes mistakes and undoubtedly not all bears or humans die of old age. I would put it more like... the consequences of participating in dangerous activities are not always desirable. Hopefully Wes Perkins (the photo guy participating in hunting large dangerous wild game) has another chance to continue his life and perhaps hunt or take photo ops more wisely.
As far as a "bear attack" I would have to weigh in on the side that, the phrasing implies that somehow the bear harmed or was aggressive towards someone seemingly without cause.... which we know is not the case. And yes wording does matter and yes public perception does effect policy on hunting, guns and conservation of animals (game, bears, endangered species, etc...). So give the bear a bad rap and you are contributing to negative policy towards wild animals and hunting. Despite what many may think, this is not beneficial for hunters and especially not for conservationists.
I would have changed the news article to call it something different maybe "a Bear hunting incident" but I'm also not trying to sell news articles and "Bear Attack" is ten times more likely to be read and talked about (this thread, case and point).
Anthropomorphism set aside, you wouldn't say someone sticking up for themselves attacked a bully. You'd say the bully had it coming. Why would you say a bear attacked someone participating in a hunt when we know it was trying to save it's own life? Just because it's (the bear) not a human and being hunted doesn't mean it should be demonized.
I hunt. I respect my game. If it attacked me, I'd say.... I had it comin'!
Everyone makes mistakes and undoubtedly not all bears or humans die of old age. I would put it more like... the consequences of participating in dangerous activities are not always desirable. Hopefully Wes Perkins (the photo guy participating in hunting large dangerous wild game) has another chance to continue his life and perhaps hunt or take photo ops more wisely.
As far as a "bear attack" I would have to weigh in on the side that, the phrasing implies that somehow the bear harmed or was aggressive towards someone seemingly without cause.... which we know is not the case. And yes wording does matter and yes public perception does effect policy on hunting, guns and conservation of animals (game, bears, endangered species, etc...). So give the bear a bad rap and you are contributing to negative policy towards wild animals and hunting. Despite what many may think, this is not beneficial for hunters and especially not for conservationists.
I would have changed the news article to call it something different maybe "a Bear hunting incident" but I'm also not trying to sell news articles and "Bear Attack" is ten times more likely to be read and talked about (this thread, case and point).
Anthropomorphism set aside, you wouldn't say someone sticking up for themselves attacked a bully. You'd say the bully had it coming. Why would you say a bear attacked someone participating in a hunt when we know it was trying to save it's own life? Just because it's (the bear) not a human and being hunted doesn't mean it should be demonized.
I hunt. I respect my game. If it attacked me, I'd say.... I had it comin'!
Last edited:
