pharmer
Member
Ammo. Dry up the supply of ammo and components and in a short time America is effectively disarmed. Joe
Gottcha................Note, we won't be discussing this further in open forum.
Please see the Rules, to which we all agreed when we registered and note:
So that this board can be useful to the responsible gun owner, we will discuss the law and Second Amendment issues as long as we can do so without straying into areas of politics, political wrangling, candidates for office, etc., unless clearly tangential to a core gun related discussion.
The fact is that most folks most of the time seem to "get it" as evidenced by a lot of good and lively discussion of core gun, gun rights and gun law issues.
Now, back to the thread.
Agreed, the past 2 appointees to the SC were VERY anti gun, Heller was 5-4....They're waiting.....for another grabber justice or two on the Supreme Court. At that time expect several cases to start working their way up the state court systems. All they need is one to make it to the Supreme Court.
They know they can't win with elections....all the new battles will be in the court room....with their judges.
I don't get this thread. With the exception of California, we're kicking their brains out.
It's like Zhukov standing on the Seelowe Heights and asking Rokossovski where he thinks the Germans WISH they could attack next. Who cares? They're going to get crushed.
I had list prioritized and justified but then thought - why the heck would I assist in providing a play book/ strategy?
I doubt that we'll give them any new ideas. There's thousands (tens of thousands?) of them and they are well funded and have been around for decades. I doubt that there's anything that we could think of that they haven't ran past a lawyer, lobbyist or think tank.That is what I was just thinking. Don't give them any well thought out ideas.