Saluki91
Member
I'm embarking on my first AR Build... fingers crossed!
As I am very early in the process, I don't yet know enough to even make valid assumptions. I'd appreciate some input re. fixed trigger guards vs. removable trigger guards.
Are there inherent advantages to either? If a lower with a fixed guard (Mid States) is similar money to one with a removable guard (PSA), which way should I go?
Potential for flawed thinking is high in what follows:
It seems a broken fixed trigger guard is a catastrophic event... meaning a new lower is in order. Whereas a broken removable guard can be easily replaced .
It also seems that a fixed guard may be more rigid, and less likely to break in the first place.
Thanks in advance for any guidance you can provide.
As I am very early in the process, I don't yet know enough to even make valid assumptions. I'd appreciate some input re. fixed trigger guards vs. removable trigger guards.
Are there inherent advantages to either? If a lower with a fixed guard (Mid States) is similar money to one with a removable guard (PSA), which way should I go?
Potential for flawed thinking is high in what follows:
It seems a broken fixed trigger guard is a catastrophic event... meaning a new lower is in order. Whereas a broken removable guard can be easily replaced .
It also seems that a fixed guard may be more rigid, and less likely to break in the first place.
Thanks in advance for any guidance you can provide.