Shawnee
member
I would earnestly agree with buying the deer rifle now and waiting to get a more powerful rifle when you actually need it. In that scenario I would say get a .243 now and either a .270 or a 7mm/08 later for bigger game. The .243 will cover you nicely from varmints and targets to even the biggest deer.
If you have decided to buy just one rifle to use for everything from deer to moose then the two calibers that unquestionably stand miles above all others - bar none - are the .270 Winchester and the 7mm/08 Remington. The .270 and the 7mm/08 are the only two calibers ever invented anywhere, anytime that are truly "all-around" hunting calibers capable of bridging the entire gap between deer and moose with authority... at least for "all-around" hunters/riflemen. The more robust calibers are just for the lads who think gunpowder and Viagra are the same thing and need a quart of each for every shot.
Ballisitcs and field performance for the .270 and 7mm/08 are actually quite similar so deciding between them is close to being a coin toss. One way is to decide if you want a "short action" caliber (the 7mm/08) or a "long action" (the .270).
That issue doesn't matter much to many folks though, so if you don't particularly care about "short vs long action" then you could decide on the basis of which make/model rifle you really like and which of those two calibers does it come in.... OR...
...you could just look around and buy the rifle you find the best deal on as long as it is either a .270 or a 7mm/08.
Don't worry about ammo cost because compared to all the money you spend hunting, the difference in ammo cost between the .25/06 and .270 and 7mm/08 isn't enough to worry about.
There's my 50 cents wurff.
If you have decided to buy just one rifle to use for everything from deer to moose then the two calibers that unquestionably stand miles above all others - bar none - are the .270 Winchester and the 7mm/08 Remington. The .270 and the 7mm/08 are the only two calibers ever invented anywhere, anytime that are truly "all-around" hunting calibers capable of bridging the entire gap between deer and moose with authority... at least for "all-around" hunters/riflemen. The more robust calibers are just for the lads who think gunpowder and Viagra are the same thing and need a quart of each for every shot.
Ballisitcs and field performance for the .270 and 7mm/08 are actually quite similar so deciding between them is close to being a coin toss. One way is to decide if you want a "short action" caliber (the 7mm/08) or a "long action" (the .270).
That issue doesn't matter much to many folks though, so if you don't particularly care about "short vs long action" then you could decide on the basis of which make/model rifle you really like and which of those two calibers does it come in.... OR...
...you could just look around and buy the rifle you find the best deal on as long as it is either a .270 or a 7mm/08.
Don't worry about ammo cost because compared to all the money you spend hunting, the difference in ammo cost between the .25/06 and .270 and 7mm/08 isn't enough to worry about.
There's my 50 cents wurff.