Had both and went to nothing but autos or revolvers?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Big Mike

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
738
Location
Panhandle, FL
Seems like most of us oscillate with different bullet delivery systems, but I'm considering consolidating to revolvers. Rationale: my current CCW is an SP-101 .357. Other pistol is a S&W auto, 4043 (nightstand). Have had a multitude of autos but never seem to like'em enough to keep from trading/selling them. Thinking of trading the 4043 to a S&W 627 to have parity with ammo and operations. Also, nothing against autos, but as I get older I seem to gravitate to revolvers more. Anyone have nothing but revolvers and get rid of them for all autos? Thoughts? I may be suffering from LHD (Lew Horton Disease...:) Mike
 
I don't know if I qualify, I've only ever had revolver (Uberti SA .45 LC) and I'd never carry an SA revolver. I gave it away 10 years ago and never replaced it. Now I'm kind of a CZ snob.
 
I started with autos and picked up some revolvers along the way.

Last couple of years, I got rid of all the revolvers and most the autos in order to consolidate calibers.

Recently, I got sucked back into a revolver. But, it's in a caliber I was consolidating into.
 
Started with revolvers, then bought some 1911s. I've been shooting both types about equally but have recently picked up a few more wheel guns so the balance will likely shift to the revolvers again.
As much as I like the 1911, there is just something about a wheel gun...
 
I am going to more revolvers even though I LIKED, shot and there was nothing wrong with my former NIB semi automatic pistols. I plan on selling my late husband's S&W Model 41 too. Bought NIB between 1998-2001. I sold 2 back east after he died and before I moved out west as planned.

Catherine
 
I started on Revolvers "back in the day" and later jumped on the "bottomfeeder" bandwagon.

Now I'm back to Revolvers and loving them. I will probably always keep a 1911 and a Glock 19 around, but the rest will most likely be of the Round Gun variety. :)

Of course, if a Browning Hi-Power comes my way I may decide to buy it if the price is right. I guess I'm just more of a "traditionalist" as 1911's and Hi-Powers were the autoloaders of choice when I was growing up.

I just added two more roundguns to the safe in the past month, and sold a "bottomfeeder" to do it. :D I don't like selling guns, but I also don't like keeping guns that are just "taking up space" when they can be replaced with something I have "feelings" for.

At work it's the issued "bottomfeeder". On my time, it's what I want to carry, 1911, Glock 19 or a variety of Revolvers. 99% of the time I choose the Revolvers.

BikerRN

BikerRN
 
Some years back I realized I didn't own one single auto anymore.

So, I began a shift so the autos would be more evenly represented in my collection. It has been a couple decades now, but I now have about 10 autos for every revolver.

Revolvers are far from eliminated in my collection. I can think of six at least offhand and that means there have got to be 10 or 12 total.

These days I only have one revolver that I would carry. It is a 1917 S&W in .45 ACP.

Autos have simply come too far. Power and reliability have become the domain of the auto. Given the level of firepower (number of rounds) available in the auto, the revolver just doesn't measure up.

Nice to talk about, fun to debate, but the revolver's days are numbered. If I want a real big round I'll go single shot and take the accuracy over the second shot.

If I need a second shot I don't want ridiculous double action revolver pull or to have to cock the hammer and realign in a single action revolver. I want the smooth, fast, easy response of a self-stuffer.

Thirty years ago all I carried were revolvers. Now I have one revolver that qualifies as a carry gun. In another 20 years it will only be old timers and a few women who carry revolvers.
 
Started out with revolvers, both SA and DA types. But my older brother was an autoloader fan, and gradually over time, I became a dedicated auto enthusiast too. Never forget my revolver interests though, as I usually can number at least one for every two autos that I have.
 
I had both but sold off all my revolvers. It had more to do with the economics of feeding them than anything else. I consider getting a Single Six every now and again, but something else always comes up.

jm
 
I like them all but probably have 3 or 4 revolvers for every auto. I just find the wheelguns to be more artistic.
 
All autos here---came close to a 637 or SP101 the other day---wound up putting a G26 on lay-a-way----same size--weight----double the shots on tap.

My long guns have decidedly takin a turn for the old fashioned---lever and bolt action rifles and SxS shotguns. Blued and wood.
 
Fella's;

A non-question for me. I have both & plan on keeping both types around. Each type serves a function in my shooting & I am not planning on limiting my lifestyle due to platform considerations.

900F
 
I will always and forever prefer actually SHOOTING revolvers (usually more accurate, no brass chasing) as well as carrying them afield and hunting with them. They're more versatile, more accurate, more powerful. They are simply BETTER for some applications which the spray and pray mall ninja crowd doesn't care about anyway, probably.

That said, autos don't HAVE to be that accurate or powerful to serve well in the defensive role. They carry flatter/more concealable. A 9mm pocket gun is very compact and has twice the firepower, typically, of a J frame while being smaller and flatter. A reload is easier to carry and you really only need to worry about carrying one when the mags hold 10 rounds or more. Speed loaders are a lump in a pocket and magazines are faster when your last name isn't Miculek.

SO, I have both. My fav carry is a Kel Tec P11 and I own 3 other centerfire autoloaders. I have 20 firearms and other than the 4 autos and the rimfire autos and a Contender (single shot hunting pistol), the rest are all revolvers.

There is room for both in my collection and reason to own both. And, I have a real thing for single action revolvers, especially for hunting or outdoor work. But, the look and style is ingrained in me much as are side by side shotguns. I just love the look of 'em. Maybe it's all those TV westerns I watched as a kid, but single actions are STRONG and have real utility afield. Some day, I'll have enough money for a Freedom Arms .454. I have absolutely no desire for an auto that costs that much.
 
You got two hands, why can't you own an auto and a revolver?:D:D I believe it is important to keep up with both action types. Lots of reasons but the main one is you never know how life will take you somewhere and what tools will be left before you. Knowing to operate both kinds of tools well may save your life.

jj
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top