Doc3402
Member
After years of taxpayer funded research the FBI has determined that in order for a gun/ammo combination to be good enough for their agents it needs to consistently penetrate to a depth of 12 inches or more. The .380 can't do that. The .22 LR can't do that, either. The operative word is "consistently" and shouldn't be taken lightly.
A firearm that fails to perform 50% of the time would be quickly taken out of consideration for a self defense weapon, so why not do the same for a cartridge? If you'll follow the link you will see the .380 JHP doesn't perform anywhere near the FBI penetration requirements.
http://www.firearmstactical.com/briefs.htm"]http://www.firearmstactical.com/briefs.htm
This does not mean that a person shot with a .380 won't die, and it doesn't mean a .380 won't take the fight out of an aggressor. What it implies is that as a defensive cartridge the .380 JHP is not to be depended on. Sadly they did not test a FMJ round. I would be interested in knowing if it met the criteria.
With all that said there is something else to be considered. At times a loud bang and a muzzle flash will be enough to take the fight out of an aggressor and a .380 meets these requirements. I know if somebody was shooting at me the first thing I would be looking for is a place to hide or a way to leave. It's when there is no place to hide and no way to leave that your firearm becomes important. At that point you will be saddened that you didn't find a way to conceal carry a howitzer.
Remember, a .380 on the hip beats a .44 magnum in the dresser drawer.
A firearm that fails to perform 50% of the time would be quickly taken out of consideration for a self defense weapon, so why not do the same for a cartridge? If you'll follow the link you will see the .380 JHP doesn't perform anywhere near the FBI penetration requirements.
http://www.firearmstactical.com/briefs.htm"]http://www.firearmstactical.com/briefs.htm
This does not mean that a person shot with a .380 won't die, and it doesn't mean a .380 won't take the fight out of an aggressor. What it implies is that as a defensive cartridge the .380 JHP is not to be depended on. Sadly they did not test a FMJ round. I would be interested in knowing if it met the criteria.
With all that said there is something else to be considered. At times a loud bang and a muzzle flash will be enough to take the fight out of an aggressor and a .380 meets these requirements. I know if somebody was shooting at me the first thing I would be looking for is a place to hide or a way to leave. It's when there is no place to hide and no way to leave that your firearm becomes important. At that point you will be saddened that you didn't find a way to conceal carry a howitzer.
Remember, a .380 on the hip beats a .44 magnum in the dresser drawer.