Jeff Timm
Member
What do you mean by "full size?"
The advantage to the 9mm is it's small round size. It's a .38 Special class cartridge in a package half the size.
If you are a US Shooter new guns are limited to 10 rd magazines, at least through the end of the year, there is little to be gained by exceeding 7" x 5" package.
I've been looking at 9mm pistols, a single column compact seems to be the best balanced weapon.
The US Army wrote up criteria for a new sidearm, after 35 years of research, and bought the big Beretta. I suspect they have regretted this choice ever since. In the 1970s the old FRG police forces got together and held a competition for new pistols in 9x19 NATO. The big winner was the SIG 225, just recently discontinued. Other guns including the SIG 239 have filled the niche.
Geoff
Who is looking at compact 9s. I just famfired (50 rounds informal range work) a Glock 26. Not bad, chunky with a short grip I could only get two fingers on. 6.3" x 4.2"
The advantage to the 9mm is it's small round size. It's a .38 Special class cartridge in a package half the size.
If you are a US Shooter new guns are limited to 10 rd magazines, at least through the end of the year, there is little to be gained by exceeding 7" x 5" package.
I've been looking at 9mm pistols, a single column compact seems to be the best balanced weapon.
The US Army wrote up criteria for a new sidearm, after 35 years of research, and bought the big Beretta. I suspect they have regretted this choice ever since. In the 1970s the old FRG police forces got together and held a competition for new pistols in 9x19 NATO. The big winner was the SIG 225, just recently discontinued. Other guns including the SIG 239 have filled the niche.
Geoff
Who is looking at compact 9s. I just famfired (50 rounds informal range work) a Glock 26. Not bad, chunky with a short grip I could only get two fingers on. 6.3" x 4.2"