Hey Tuner, xray of 1911 firing

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi Peter, and thanks for using that approach...the scientific one.

The ejecta is the sum of bullet mass and that of the particulate in the gasses and smoke from the burned powder. The mass of those gasses is nearly the same as that of the unburned powder...so there is a recoil impulse after the bullet exits. It's just too small to detect during the cycle of the gun. Figuring a typical 5-grain charge at about the speed of sound...say a thousand fps here to keep it simple...and ignoring the blowby gasses that escape past the bullet
at the instant of ignition...that impulse would be roughly 1/8th that of a .22 Short fired from a 2.5 pound pistol. Pretty insignifigant, but still part of the whole. With bottleneck rifle calibers, you have a little different set of dynamics at work, but that's meat for another discussion.

The nominal .45 ACP bore diameter is .451 inch. Land diameter is .005-.007 inch smaller, depending on the barrel manufacturer. Nominal bullet diameter is .451 inch. Assuming nominal dimensions, even a non-rifled bore would present a good bit of resistance to the bullet, since the plug is the same size as the hole.

Of course, bullet material is also a factor. Harder jacket alloys offer more resistance, as do harder lead cores. Lead bullets offer less for a given diameter...but alloy also is a factor. Some lead alloys are harder than others.
A basic rule of thumb is that lead bullets need to be sized to .001 inch larger than bore diameter for best performance. I size my cast bullets to .452 inch.

For your calculations, you'll need to weigh a slide, a barrel, and a bullet to determine the ratio. For all practical purposes, 40:1 will do.

I know you asked Tuner, but if I may just add, the recoil is the result of the ejecta energy regardless of the launch platform's mechanism.

Yep. It doesn't matter whether the gun is a semi-auto or a musket. Force forward is force backward. The semi-auto's design simply spreads the recoil impulse out over a longer time and distance. That's why a self loading shotgun's recoil is more like a hard shove, while a pump of equal mass is a sharper punch.

Oh...One more thing for Grump. You have to grip the rope a distance from the end, or you probably won't see it.

...stretching the topstrap comes from the bullet hitting the forcing cone

Think about that statement, John...and you're partially correct...but you're ignoring the fact that there still has to be an opposing force that is driving the frame away from the bullet in order to cause a tensile stress on the topstrap. Otherwise, the gun would pitch forward. There can't be one force in one direction. Force forward...Force backward. Remember?

Where you scored is...The most resistance is offered at the inception of bullet acceleration...within the first half-inch or so. Objects at rest and all. The same goes for trying to force a plug into a hole that's smaller than the plug. The harder and faster you push...the harder it resists.

Which reminds me...

Peter. One other thing. The contact resistance between bullet and barrel isn't constant. It's much greater at the very beginning, when the bullet hits the hard resistance in the leade...before it gets started into the rifling. Always harder to get an object moving than it is to keep it moving. That's why pressure peaks early and fast, and that's where 90% of the punch is delivered to the breechblock and locking lugs.

As the bullete accelerates, pressure also drops fast. There are two things at work here. The faster it's moving, the less force it takes to keep it moving...and to accelerate it. Since force forward=force backward...the force against the lugs also drops off.

And...Because the volume of the cylinder behind the bullet is increasing. So...The forces at work are sudden and high at the start...and diminish as the bullet moves.
 
The front faces of the barrel lugs are clearly being pressed against the rear faces of the slide lugs....AND...because there is a signifigant FORWARD drag on the barrel by the BULLET...it's pulling that barrel backward against resistance...against a force that is trying to push it forward...whether or not you want to believe it.

You're ignoring the fact that that barrel would be forward against the lugs in any case, simply because the slide is trying to pull everything BACKWARDS; the inertia of the barrel itself is enough to make sure that the barrel will be pressed forward. And, since there's no mechanism for unlocking the pistol until well AFTER the bullet is long gone (which would be the case, locked breech or not, simply because the slide has so much more mass than the bullet), claiming that this "bullet pulling the barrel forward" hocus-pocus plays any part in the operation of the pistol is like claiming that a magical pixie sits inside the pistol, telling it what to do and when.
 
Definitely; the DRAG of the slide (acting under the impulse of firing) is what makes the pistol operate, while the "DRAG" of the bullet is irrelevant, since the pistol operates identically with or without it.
 
Definitely; the DRAG of the slide (acting under the impulse of firing) is what makes the pistol operate, while the "DRAG" of the bullet is irrelevant, since the pistol operates identically with or without it.

Man, you just keep digging deeper don't you.:D
 
As far as I can see, there is absolutely NO EVIDENCE that the friction of the bullet travelling down the barrel plays any part whatsoever in the operation of the pistol; if it DID, then the pistol would operate differently when you fire it with ammunition than when you operate it manually.
 
As far as I can see, there is absolutely NO EVIDENCE that the friction of the bullet travelling down the barrel plays any part whatsoever in the operation of the pistol

Well...Okay then. As far as you can see is your opinion and you're welcome to it...but I know what I know.

Man, you just keep digging deeper don't you.

Yessir...That would seem to be the case.

Well...I suppose that we could probably make a strong argument against the existence of energy, since its equation is written: E=mc (squared) and because it's physically impossible for anything to travel faster than the speed of light...Albert Einstein MUST have been a flippin' idiot.
 
As far as I can see, there is absolutely NO EVIDENCE that the friction of the bullet travelling down the barrel plays any part whatsoever in the operation of the pistol; if it DID, then the pistol would operate differently when you fire it with ammunition than when you operate it manually.

Well when you can cycle it manually in the same time frame it does under shooting conditions then I guess it will not matter.
 
Since it's pretty clear that you haven't taken a look at the original patent specifications, I've copied a few lines...verbatim...of what is contained therein. Here, the designer...the inventor...The man himself is telling you how the pistol works. He didn't go into great detail, but common sense, logic, and a basic understanding of physics will provide the rest of the story.

Of course...Browning was another moron who believed in pixie dust...so how can you take him seriously?

The text from the original patents:

"The presentation and introduction of a loaded cartridge into the chamber of the barrel-and CLOSING AND LOCKING of the breech-are automatically effected through or by the energy of the recoil of the breech bolt-or that part which AT THE TIME OF THE FIRING OF THE SHOT closes the breech of the barrel."

Skip over to:

"For the additional reason that-at the commencing of the recoil-that the light barrel may readily yield to, and move rearward with the breech bolt."
 
Can anyone explain how the Schwarzlose blow-forward action
worked with a standing breech and movable barrel, if the
bullet does not drag the barrel forward as Tuner claims?

Or is that another can of worms?
 
Tuner, you know as well as I do that Browning's patent says nothing about using "bullet pull" to keep the breech locked; that's what the LUGS are there for, remember?

OTOH, the Schwarzlose clearly DOES use some element of friction between the bullet and barrel to operate, but it was designed to operate as a "blow-forward" design (the energy of the cartridge firing is directed against both the bullet and the barrel, and the bullet being substantially lighter, the bullet ends up being propelled faster). If the 1911 operated in a similar manner, Tuner might have a point, but since the pistol is locked and unlocked by a mechanism that is totally UNRELATED to "bullet pull", I remain unconvinced of his hypothesis.
 
Hmm, or how a blank would work without drag on the barrel. I haven't read the entire post so pardon me for stepping in late. But there's a lot of typing gone by.
 
Peterotte,

"If you can give me the weight of the slide, the weight of the barrel...then I will do the math and show you how it works"

I weighed the slide & barrel from my PC1911 using a trigger pull gauge and got 14oz for the slide and 3.3oz for the barrel. These may not be exact and they vary from gun to gun anyway but they'll give you something to work with.

--Bill
 
but since the pistol is locked and unlocked by a mechanism that is totally UNRELATED to "bullet pull", I remain unconvinced of his hypothesis.

But the only time it is locked is during firing. When the bullet is pulling the barrel against the slide lugs.
Any other time it is not locked.
 
But the only time it is locked is during firing. When the bullet is pulling the barrel against the slide lugs.
Any other time it is not locked.

No, the pistol is locked at any point between full battery (when the slide is forward) and the moment of unlocking (the point where the link pulls the rear of the barrel down and the locking lugs out of their recess in the slide). And, as JohnKSA's experiment shows, the pistol doesn't require any sort of "bullet pulling force" to operate the way it does.
 
No, the pistol is locked at any point between full battery (when the slide is forward) and the moment of unlocking (the point where the link pulls the rear of the barrel down and the locking lugs out of their recess in the slide)

uh...if it was locked then you could not open it by hand. Just as you would not be able to open it during that fraction of a second that the bullet is going down the barrel.
THEN it is locked.
 
I'm not so hot on the workings of a pistol but I have a question. When the cartridge is discharged, the case expands tightly against the chamber, not so? How much 'grip' does the rearward-moving case have on the chamber, and is this a significant rearward force applied via the case to the barrel?
 
the case expands tightly against the chamber, not so? How much 'grip' does the rearward-moving case have on the chamber,

With a straight-walled pistol case...enough to seal the chamber and prevent most of the gas blow-by, but not enough to keep the case nailed in position. Again...Different set of dynamics at work with a bottle-necked rifle case operating at nearly 60,000 pounds psi. Good question, though.
 
SDC

I think that what you and I were doing is thinking of bullet drag down the barrel? It's bullet resistance as it gets swaged into the leade AND the initial static friction that Tuner is refering to (Am I correct there Tuner?). That resistive force occurs close to peak chamber pressures as Tuner explains and is indeed high. Of course, once it is moving and has been swaged, the drag will be much less. And of course, barrel expansion under gas pressure at that point is insignificant, (but might become more significant further down the barrel?).

brownie

Thanks for that info.

Tuner

With a straight-walled pistol case...enough to seal the chamber and prevent most of the gas blow-by, but not enough to keep the case nailed in position. Again...Different set of dynamics at work with a bottle-necked rifle case operating at nearly 60,000 pounds psi. Good question, though.

This would make and intertesting topic. A new thread perhaps?

Regards
Peter
 
Can anyone explain how the Schwarzlose blow-forward action
worked with a standing breech and movable barrel, if the
bullet does not drag the barrel forward as Tuner claims?Or is that another can of worms?

Easy one, Carl. Bullets are smart, see? They know that if they're fired in a blow-forward pistol that they have to drag the barrel forward to make it work, see? But if they're fired in anything else, they know not to do it. Simple!

I'm surprised that a sharp guy like you didn't figure that out...

:)
 
I think that what you and I were doing is thinking of bullet drag down the barrel? It's bullet resistance as it gets swaged into the leade AND the initial static friction that Tuner is refering to (Am I correct there Tuner?).

That's where 90% or more of the force comes in, but the bullet is causing a forward drag on the barrel as long as it's in the barrel and moving.

If anything CAN have an effect, it WILL have an effect. Nothing is everything, but everything is something.
 
that's what the LUGS are there for, remember?

No no no! The lugs are there to keep the slide and barrel from separating under pressure. The lugs don't lock the gun when it's static/in-battery. The just mesh together...like gear teeth.

Re-read this part...carefully this time.

"The presentation and introduction of a loaded cartridge into the chamber of the barrel-and CLOSING AND LOCKING of the breech-are automatically effected through or by the energy of the recoil of the breech bolt-or that part which AT THE TIME OF THE FIRING OF THE SHOT closes the breech of the barrel."


but it was designed to operate as a "blow-forward" design (the energy of the cartridge firing is directed against both the bullet and the barrel

No. That ain't what it said in the description posted...but I guess that now the people who engineered it don't know how it works any better than Browning understood the 1911.

Here's a cut and paste exerpt of the blowforward description. You may want to go back and take another look.

"The bullet is fired down the bore of the inner movable barrel. The movement of the bullet along the bore of the inner movable barrel drags the barrel forward against the action of the bias spring."
 
uh...if it was locked then you could not open it by hand. Just as you would not be able to open it during that fraction of a second that the bullet is going down the barrel.
THEN it is locked.

It's physically locked at any point during that travel, unless you believe that two or more solid pieces of metal can pass through one another, and it has nothing to do with whether or not a bullet is passing down the bore; the fact that the slide is locked to the slide during part of the firing cycle is a nice feature and all, but the fact is, it would still operate as a straight blowback because there is no way that the slide can open as fast as the bullet can clear the barrel.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top