Actually though, I've only seen one pistol I think is uglier than the Hi-Point and that's a Glock
I'm really shocked that several people seem to have had similar thoughts to this. I am not a lover of plastic guns, I don't own a Glock, I may someday but only because it works well. I think Glocks are some of the ugliest guns out there. But compared to the Hi-Points they are absolutely beautiful. The absolutely ugliest gun I've ever seen is my Hi-Point Carbine with chrome receiver and handguard.
Anyway, a lot of people here seem to be making fun of Hi-Point in good fun. I can respect that. However, others actually seem to hate them, that I don't get.
Sure, some Hi-Points are lemons, but so are some Kimbers, HKs, Glocks, etc. Why is it that when an expensive company makes a lemon it is just a lemon and when an inexpensive company makes a lemon it is because they make POC guns?
Generally Hi-Points are actually quite reliable. My carbine wasn't at first, I had some magazine issues, but those have been sorted out and I've had hundreds of rounds (hey, I've only had it for a bit more than a month) through it now without a bobble. For a cheap beater gun (car gun, home defense gun that you don't care if it gets confiscated if you are in a SD shooting, just for fun, etc) or for someone on a limited budget they serve an underserved market. It is a reliable, accurate, and very affordable gun. As others have said before, what is wrong with that?