spartacus2002
Member
Why does the intrusivness of an action even factor into whether it is constitutional or not? I've read the decisions that have been posted but I, personally, don't see the link between how intrusive a search is and why it would be constitutional.
If you really wanna blow a fuse, go read the case from several years ago in which Supreme Court said you can pee-test high school athletes, then the follow-on case where they expanded it to say you can pee-test all high school students involved in extracurricular activities.
SCOTUS actually said that since athletes strip down and change clothes in front of each other, they've given up their privacy, so peeing in a cup isn't a privacy intrusion. I am not making this up!!!
BOW, KNEEL, SUBMIT TO YOUR RULERS