How about Burris?
- Thread starter Axis II
- Start date
- Status
bikerdoc
Moderator In Memoriam
I have a 4X on my carbine. Works well, no complaints.
NIGHTLORD40K
Member
Have a Full field 3-9x 40mm and a Black Diamond 6-24x 50mm. The big one has the mil-dot reticule which is hard to see at high magnification, but both are nice scopes with top notch light gathering and clarity. The full field is a good scope for the money.
JackSprat
Member
I had never had a Burris till I bought a Savage Axis 223 with a Burris Predator Quest ,and I really like it..From what I understand they have a real good forever warranty..
badkarmamib
Member
I replaced my Tasco 
with a FullField E1. WORLD of difference. This is the most expensive piece of glass I have ever bought, and have absolutely no regrets.
with a FullField E1. WORLD of difference. This is the most expensive piece of glass I have ever bought, and have absolutely no regrets.
Varminterror
Member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2016
- Messages
- 15,028
XTR II 5-25x FFP here, no complaints. Not as clear and bright as Nightforce, or even Bushnell, but it's great glass and tracks well.
cdb1
Member
I have no prejudice against them, some of my best friends are Burris. I had a Fullfield II 2-7x35 on my Marlin 336 for several years and two Fullfield II 3-9x40's, one on a 6.5x55 and the other on a 30-06. I upgraded to two Leupolds and a Meopta because for a couple of years I got 60% off MSRP on several scope brands.
The Fullfield II is my second favorite scope under $200.00 and for a long time was my favorite but it has been supplanted by the Minox ZV 3 line. On a lever gun I'd get a Fullfield II 2-7 though because the lowest magnification the Minox comes in is 3-9.
Just between us girls, I haven't encountered a situation with my new scopes that the Burris scopes wouldn't have handled just fine.
The Fullfield II is my second favorite scope under $200.00 and for a long time was my favorite but it has been supplanted by the Minox ZV 3 line. On a lever gun I'd get a Fullfield II 2-7 though because the lowest magnification the Minox comes in is 3-9.
Just between us girls, I haven't encountered a situation with my new scopes that the Burris scopes wouldn't have handled just fine.
Last edited:
eastbank
Member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2009
- Messages
- 5,021
i just bought a msr .223 3x9-40 for on a light 223 rifle, pro,s clear-focus ring does not turn with the power ring- clicks pretty good- forever warranty, no questions asked(about time), con,s heavy to me-made in the phillipines(if it matters) and about the same price as a verix 1 3x9 leupold. eastbank.
Attachments
I've had very good luck with Burris FF-II's in 3-9X40. In fact I think that it is probably the most value for the dollar in a 3-9X40 scope. At around $200 it compares very favorably to a $300 Leupold VX-2. Actually you have to pay $350 for a VX-2 with a BDC reticle that comes on the Burris for $200ish.
I'll be honest, I've never even had a Burris 2-7X version in my hands, never looked through one. The only negative that I can pinpoint is that the adjustments are 1/2" at 100 yards vs 1/4" on most scopes. It could make getting it zeroed at 100 yards or farther less precise. Probably not an issue on your rifle.
But... simply based on years of reading posts here and on other gun related forums I've read some negative reviews on the 2-7X version from people whose opinions I trust. I don't think it is a bad scope, you could certainly do worse. I could highly recommend the 3-9X40 even though it is probably more scope than you need. I just think it is a better scope.
I have used and would recommend the Redfield Revolution or Leupold VX-1. The Redfield is close in price to the Burris and the Leupold isn't too much more. A 2-7X or 1-4X is probably ideal for your rifle.
Never used one of these, but hear too much good about them to ignore it.
https://swfa.com/weaver-1-3x20-classic-v-rifle-scope-kit.html
I have used these and like them.
https://swfa.com/redfield-2-7x33-revolution-rifle-scope.html
I just realized this was on sale. At this price this is the way to go.
https://swfa.com/leupold-2-7x33-vx-1-riflescope.html
Or this
https://swfa.com/leupold-1-4x20-vx-1-hog-scope.html
I'll be honest, I've never even had a Burris 2-7X version in my hands, never looked through one. The only negative that I can pinpoint is that the adjustments are 1/2" at 100 yards vs 1/4" on most scopes. It could make getting it zeroed at 100 yards or farther less precise. Probably not an issue on your rifle.
But... simply based on years of reading posts here and on other gun related forums I've read some negative reviews on the 2-7X version from people whose opinions I trust. I don't think it is a bad scope, you could certainly do worse. I could highly recommend the 3-9X40 even though it is probably more scope than you need. I just think it is a better scope.
I have used and would recommend the Redfield Revolution or Leupold VX-1. The Redfield is close in price to the Burris and the Leupold isn't too much more. A 2-7X or 1-4X is probably ideal for your rifle.
Never used one of these, but hear too much good about them to ignore it.
https://swfa.com/weaver-1-3x20-classic-v-rifle-scope-kit.html
I have used these and like them.
https://swfa.com/redfield-2-7x33-revolution-rifle-scope.html
I just realized this was on sale. At this price this is the way to go.
https://swfa.com/leupold-2-7x33-vx-1-riflescope.html
Or this
https://swfa.com/leupold-1-4x20-vx-1-hog-scope.html
cdb1
Member
I liked the 2-7 Fullfield II I had.
In low light I believe Fullfield's pretty much outclass other scopes in the same price range.
In low light I believe Fullfield's pretty much outclass other scopes in the same price range.
highlander 5
Member
I don't know the model but I've an 8-32 50 mm on my 308 700BDL very nice scope and as I recall cost more than the rifle.
chicharrones
needs more ammo
I only have one Burris, a 2x handgun scope. It seems as good as I can afford with no complaints from me.
Creature
Member
I had a Burris AR-332. When I first got it, I tortured tested the crap out of it. I was pleased (and honestly a little surprised) that it did not fail any of my tests.
That said, it didn't take long for me to really dislike the reticle.
That said, it didn't take long for me to really dislike the reticle.
greyling22
Member
I had a ff2 2-7x35. Then I bought a vortex diamondback 1.5-5x32 (?) And from 2-5x the vortex was significantly brighter with a much larger field of view. I sold the Burris. It was a fine scope, but if I can get better for cheaper, that's what I'm going to do.
I'm a big fan of the Fullfield II 4.5-14x42. I bought one, compared it carefully to my Vortex Viper and Sightron SII scopes that cost about $400 street price, found it slightly better than those at any given magnification, and bought 3 more of Burris scopes. It's the only Burris model I own, but I wouldn't hesitate to try another if I had a need.
NorthBorder
Member
I got a Burris C4. I put it on my .270 w/ my hand load and dialed it in at 100 yds. I sent the hand load info in to Burris and they sent me a elevation turret tailored to my load. By golly, it works as advertised. I was shooting 1+ MOA out to 200 yds when I dialed it out to 200, and 300 yds when I dialed up to 300.
MutinousDoug
Member
I have a Burris 2 3/4x Scout on my Swede and a 4x Mini PA on my 10-22. I like both fine for what they are.
Bayourambler
Member
I have 3 burris scopes, a fullfield 2, fullfield e1. And xtr 2. I like them all. Xtr isn't the clearest but plenty good for the price and features it has. I just put a 4.5 -14 fullfield e1 on a new rifle and I would put the clarity up on this one against ANYTHING !! They are the best scopes for the price that I have found.
dagger dog
Member
Another Fullfield II 4.5 X 14, mounted on a .308 bolt gun, was fortunate to buy mine during a sale which included a free spotting scope.
Was in the market for another scope to put on a .223 varmint rifle and was about to pull the trigger on another Fullfield but went for a Vortex Diamondback.
I would give a slight edge to the FFII.
Was in the market for another scope to put on a .223 varmint rifle and was about to pull the trigger on another Fullfield but went for a Vortex Diamondback.
I would give a slight edge to the FFII.
Bayourambler
Member
Yep Dad just put a Vortex Diamondback on his 6.5cm. I shot his and the 308 with the FF E1 side by side. No comparison how much crisper the image was on the Burris. If anyone has to buy a scope, Ive ordered 3 in the last 8 months from Tactical Wholesalers. Unreal how much cheaper they are!! On these 3 scopes alone I saved close to $200!! Very fast shipping, 4 days max.
redneck2
Member
One of the things I appreciate on this thread is that everyone is listing both make and model. Makes it a much truer comparison
Thx
LiveLife
Member
How about Leupold American Marksman 3-9x40 for $149?
With free shipping at Cabela's - http://www.cabelas.com/product/barg...edium=AFF&utm_source=35987&rid=12&WT.tsrc=AFF
With free shipping at Cabela's - http://www.cabelas.com/product/barg...edium=AFF&utm_source=35987&rid=12&WT.tsrc=AFF
Here's another vote for the Burris FullField II 4.5-14X. I have lots of Leupolds, but bought the Burris because I had an opportunity to buy it for $230 and couldn't pass up that deal. As it turns out, I really like it and plan to put one on other rifles. I think they are an exceptional value.
- Status
