Pendragon
Member
I understand that the anti gun states would have no hope of controllig guns if people were allowed to simply go to another state to buy a gun. That is a very pragmatic reason for not allowing people to buy guns in (not from) another state.
But how is this justified on a Federal level? I can buy a car, clothing, OTC medicine, ammo and investments in a state I do not live in.
I have to wonder that this is not a pretty vulnerable law that could possibly be attacked.
Was this part of the GCA of 1968?
But how is this justified on a Federal level? I can buy a car, clothing, OTC medicine, ammo and investments in a state I do not live in.
I have to wonder that this is not a pretty vulnerable law that could possibly be attacked.
Was this part of the GCA of 1968?