cslinger
Member
I don't live in occupied territory but I was reading the thread about the FAB-10 Cali. legal AR-15.
It is legal because the magwell is sealed and only accepts 10 rounds of ammo via stripper clips etc.
So basically you can't have your evil firearm able to accept a detachable magazine correct???
In the AR-15 series the "firearm" is the lower reciever correct?
Why not design an upper designed to feed from a box magazine from the top or side, ala Bren, Sterling, Sten etc.?
Therefore you buy your perfectly legal firearm, the FAB10 lower and you simply add the magazine fed upper to it. (9mm,.223 etc.) Make it so it takes common magazines (Sten, AR15 etc.)
You end up with a funky AR-15 but one that in theory looses very little functionality vs. a "real" AR-15.
Ok I know cost is an issue and getting it to work etc. But would it be a legal work around?
Just zoning out thinking.
Chris
It is legal because the magwell is sealed and only accepts 10 rounds of ammo via stripper clips etc.
So basically you can't have your evil firearm able to accept a detachable magazine correct???
In the AR-15 series the "firearm" is the lower reciever correct?
Why not design an upper designed to feed from a box magazine from the top or side, ala Bren, Sterling, Sten etc.?
Therefore you buy your perfectly legal firearm, the FAB10 lower and you simply add the magazine fed upper to it. (9mm,.223 etc.) Make it so it takes common magazines (Sten, AR15 etc.)
You end up with a funky AR-15 but one that in theory looses very little functionality vs. a "real" AR-15.
Ok I know cost is an issue and getting it to work etc. But would it be a legal work around?
Just zoning out thinking.
Chris