"Attorney Ralph Sherman, chairman of Connecticut's pro-gun "Gunsafe" group acknowledged that the search and seizure provision, which he opposes, did result from a compromise on the total gun bill the NRA supported. The Connecticut legislature is not very "pro-gun," he said, but is divided on the issue. The state would have ended up with an even worse bill had gun rights advocates not compromised, he said. The huge Firearms Safety Act had 20 provisions attached to it, some of which were positive for gun owners, he said." - Found with Google on worldnetdaily
Any idea what the gun laws there would be like if this bill had not passed? This attorney from Gunsafe says the proposal would have been worse than the total bill - yes, including the 20 provisions tacked on it - the NRA supported.
John