I think, Bobby Lee, you're confusing remarks concerning Glocks' rather poor trigger with a "long and hard" trigger pull. As Glocks prove, it is very possible to have a poor trigger with a relatively short and light trigger stroke. Approximately .5" inches of travel at little over five pounds is a short light trigger--unfortunately it is not a very good trigger compared to the "breaks like a glass rod" pull of many competitors or even compared to the long smooth trigger pull of a revolver.
Almost any study of accidents reveal that accidents occur not when one thing goes wrong, but a lot of things go wrong all at once (and usuallly without warning). For an accidental discharge with a Glock only three things need to go wrong: 1) a finger or other object (e.g., a thumbsnap, safety strap or shirt tail) needs to get inside the trigger guard; 2) the trigger "safety" must be depressed; and 3) the trigger must be pulled to the rear a very short distance (and with a relatively light weight). All of this is compounded by the fact, there are no warnings until the "bang."
Other weapons either have more things that must go wrong (e.g., an object in the trigger guard, a grip safety depressed, a manual safety depressed, and the trigger depressed--that is at least one extra thing that has to go wrong before an accident). While other weapons may have less that have to go wrong before an accident, they tend to give some warnings (e.g., a hammer moving, a cylinder rotating) and/or else have longer, stiffer trigger pull as a warning (and give the operator a little time to react).
Glock has made some compromises for the sake of ease of operations. Unfortunately, those compromises do have offsets. If you are not willing to accept those compromises, then a different weapon is more appropriate for you.