Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

I wish they all felt this way

Discussion in 'Legal' started by broham, Feb 22, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. broham

    broham Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2007
    Messages:
    208
    February 22, 2009





    Bill Filed To Ban Microstamping Of Guns
    posted February 20, 2009

    Sen. Doug Jackson, D-Dickson, has filed legislation that would ban the sale of “microstamped” firearms and ammunition, calling them an infringement on the Second Amendment right to bear arms.

    California has passed a law mandating microstamping of firearms, “and I predict that Tennessee will pass a law banning it,” Sen. Jackson said.

    Called the “Second Amendment Protection Act,” the bill would outlaw sale of firearms and ammunition that are laser-engraved, or microstamped, to identify the buyer of the firearm or ammunition after it has been shot.

    “This process does little to track criminals, but it does a lot to eclipse our Second Amendment right to bear arms,” Sen. Jackson said.

    Microstamping would lead to the establishment of a registry or database of gun-owners who are guilty of nothing more than owning a gun, the senator noted. “A firearm registry is a preamble to gun confiscation. And the law-abiding American gun owner would have to pay the added costs it would incur.”

    He said the legislation "points out that microstamping would do little to fight or solve crime" because:

    Most guns used to commit crimes are purchased illegally, many of them stolen, so a microstamp ID would be meaningless.

    Microstamping can easily be removed from a firearm with simple tools.

    Most guns do not eject shell casings, which is where the microstamp mark is found.

    Microstamping wastes money that could be used on proven crime-fighting methods that give results.

    “Just last year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that each citizen has a constitutional right to bear arms,” Sen. Jackson said. “But we have to be diligent if we are to protect that right.

    “Microstamping is meaningless technology that threatens the Second Amendment.”

    Sen. Jackson filed the legislation Feb. 12 as Senate Bill No. 1908. If passed, it would amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39, Chapter 17, Part 13.

    Sen. Jackson represents Dickson, Giles, Hickman, Humphreys, Lawrence and Lewis Counties
     
  2. gripper

    gripper Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    824
    Location:
    Nashua NH
    Sounds like a good guy to me.
     
  3. indoorsoccerfrea

    indoorsoccerfrea Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2008
    Messages:
    738
    Location:
    Central Indy
    good man, good man...
     
  4. 6_gunner

    6_gunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    534
    Location:
    Indiana/Kentucky
    It's always especially encouraging to hear about a pro-2nd Amendment Democrat.

    If they (the Democrats) dropped their disarmament agenda entirely, they might find Republicans to be more receptive.
     
  5. mordechaianiliewicz

    mordechaianiliewicz Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    Messages:
    1,718
    Location:
    Western Missouri
    I hope they do something like this in Missouri
     
  6. BamaHoosier

    BamaHoosier Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    101
    Location:
    Alexandria,IN
    Amen! Best wishes for your endeavours,TN!
     
  7. Galadren

    Galadren Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    58
    Location:
    New Orleans, Louisiana
    Have a link to the original source? I want to post this on another set of boards but they like to have the source articles when we post things like this.
     
  8. broham

    broham Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2007
    Messages:
    208
    I first saw this over at Snipers Hide in the S-2 Intel section. It was in the Chatanoogan times. The thread Good news on the 2nd A front.
     
  9. DCortez

    DCortez Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2009
    Messages:
    74
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    Let's hope it passes.
     
  10. gc70

    gc70 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Messages:
    2,994
    Location:
    North Carolina
  11. big_bang

    big_bang Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2008
    Messages:
    77
    Or they could just stop making more regulatory gun laws altogether and just leave us the heck alone...

    I understand the motivation and sentiment behind this bill (really, I do) - but it would ban the sale of a firearm based on a certain feature. Sound familiar? How is that fundamentally good?
     
  12. Dokkalfar

    Dokkalfar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2009
    Messages:
    390
    yes, the motivation behind the idea is good, but there's not really much he can do, besides ban the microstamping... maybe?

    ... um i dont know about you, but from my experience, most firearms eject the casing
     
  13. daehawc

    daehawc Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2007
    Messages:
    132
    Location:
    Milton, FL
    I do see this as good. If more states pass similar laws then the gun makers will have to decide between selling microstamped firearms in CA or non stamped firearms to the rest of the country. This way, the whole country doesnt get sucked into this absurdity because of a couple states.
     
  14. Tennesseean

    Tennesseean Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    Messages:
    46
    I am a happy man. I really, really, really hope this passes.

    Go Vols!
     
  15. Tennesseean

    Tennesseean Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    Messages:
    46
    Whoops, double tap. Got too excited.
     
  16. Davionmaximus

    Davionmaximus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    259
    Location:
    Houston Texas
    Need to put him on my X-Mas card list...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page