I won some money at a local gun shop!

[Orange_Magnum]

None of the above. Buy the Taurus model 85.

 

[mongo4567]

I would choose the S&W 642 and the Glock 26

 

[Ben86]

It depends, what are your needs, wants?

Personally I wouldn't get the same gun that you already have, that's just boring. I'd go for the lcp and glock 26. Why not try a S&W M&P or an XD45?

 

[P90shooter]

Update on the Kahr P380. According to their website

KP3833 (2.5" Barrel)
Black polymer frame, matte stainless slide
MSRP: $649.00
Shipping December 2008!!
Due to unprecedented demand for Kahr pistols, Thompson firearms and high-capacity Thompson magazines the Kahr P380 has been delayed for approx. 30 more days. We expect to start to ship limited quantities in December.

http://www.kahr.com/PA-1_380_p.html

 

[ArchAngelCD]

Either the M442 or M642 would be my choice. They are both the same revolver except for the finish and S&W had released non-lock models of both.

If you decide to buy a .22 revolver I would suggest a M63 over the M317. Even though both are J frames the M63 has a 5" barrel and carries 8 rounds. The M317 is nice but with it's short barrel it's more difficult to shoot well. Both are nice but I would go with the M63 over the M317.

 

[Zundfolge]

Any of them would be good choices, except the Kahr pistols. The Kahr P9 I had was nothing but problems

IMO, the Kahr has far too many reports of reliability issues.

There's light years of difference between a Polymer Kahr and a steel one ... and the Elites are just that; elite.

The K9 Elite is probably one of the best carry pistols ever made in 9mm.

If it was me I'd snag that K9 and the S&W .22 (because like you said you already have one). If I didn't get the K9 I'd get the G26 because you already have a G19 and the 26 is much easier to carry.

 

[.41Dave]

Of the guns you listed, I'd buy the 442 or 642 for CCW and the 317 for cheap CCW snubby practice.