FROGO207
Member
I use this analogy of how the antis in government work instead of arguing till I am out of breath with a typical anti about gun control.
There were many people who used a car to move around every day without incident. Then one day an angry troubled young male decided to go out while making a statement. He has a few drinks and gets into a souped up classic car that is BTW stolen from someone he knows and rams it into a school bus full of kids one morning killing himself and 20 kids.
Everybody in the nation hears about it due to great media coverage and then there are several intrepid reporters that dredge up similar incidents from the past about this ALMOST happening before and there is a pattern of abuse by car owners.
The government and a lot of CONCERNED citizens call for tougher restrictions on all drivers to be implemented immediately. So the President takes up the cause and even though the people that drive safely try to stop it they enact some laws "for the children" while saying that they understand all the drivers are not a problem so we will work to keep cars for those with those that are still OK to drive.
One is that cars of a certain type go too fast so they should be banned because they look fast.
Next they say that because the person that acted with a car that all cars capable of hitting something should be limited to three tires so they cant do that again, motorcycles to one tire for the same reason.
Then they say that a steering wheel is a dangerous thingy and needs to be banned from all cars.
And on and on-------------------:banghead:
Next comes the press conferences that all the banners like to attend where they point out that you STILL can own a car and the children and general public are now safe from harm from a few individuals that MAY have been able to do this.
The last time I looked at the laws of the great United States we as citizens were supposed to be innocent until proven guilty by a court of law. Somehow this seems not the case anymore and you are helping this become commonplace.
That is what I use. Does this look like the typical antigun philosophy to you?
There were many people who used a car to move around every day without incident. Then one day an angry troubled young male decided to go out while making a statement. He has a few drinks and gets into a souped up classic car that is BTW stolen from someone he knows and rams it into a school bus full of kids one morning killing himself and 20 kids.
Everybody in the nation hears about it due to great media coverage and then there are several intrepid reporters that dredge up similar incidents from the past about this ALMOST happening before and there is a pattern of abuse by car owners.
The government and a lot of CONCERNED citizens call for tougher restrictions on all drivers to be implemented immediately. So the President takes up the cause and even though the people that drive safely try to stop it they enact some laws "for the children" while saying that they understand all the drivers are not a problem so we will work to keep cars for those with those that are still OK to drive.
One is that cars of a certain type go too fast so they should be banned because they look fast.
Next they say that because the person that acted with a car that all cars capable of hitting something should be limited to three tires so they cant do that again, motorcycles to one tire for the same reason.
Then they say that a steering wheel is a dangerous thingy and needs to be banned from all cars.
And on and on-------------------:banghead:
Next comes the press conferences that all the banners like to attend where they point out that you STILL can own a car and the children and general public are now safe from harm from a few individuals that MAY have been able to do this.
The last time I looked at the laws of the great United States we as citizens were supposed to be innocent until proven guilty by a court of law. Somehow this seems not the case anymore and you are helping this become commonplace.
That is what I use. Does this look like the typical antigun philosophy to you?