JR24
Member
I would prefer a Glock of some combination, probably the 17, as a "combat gun". Reliable accurate and light.
But the Sig 226 is a close second, losing only on weight.
But the Sig 226 is a close second, losing only on weight.
LOL
It's the "Make a great gun, better" switch!
Got a new list of audiobooks to listen to. Thanks
The 'is Glock the best combat handgun ever' thread got me wondering. Only about 30% voted Yes. I was one of them. But that means around 70% think the Glock isn't the best choice. So if it's not a Glock, what is it?
I don't mean for you personally, though CCW and Home Defense firearms are obviously still combat handguns. But what about Military and LE as well? Imagine that you had to pick one and only one service caliber full size (or compact) pistol, for any and all combative pistol roles, for the entire Country. What would you choose? What beats a Glock when you're choosing one pistol for everyone?
For today's fuzz ? S&W Mdl 19/66. More "friendly", easier to clean and maintain than *any* service auto. You got six shots and a reload, I'd advise you to learn your gun.
For military usage ? A steel framed Beretta 92 G
Definitely the P226.
View attachment 950975
I'm not sure most people would agree that a DA revolver is easier to clean than a modern polymer semi-auto. Some might say the opposite is true. And I think if "learning your gun" was all that was required to make a 6 shot revolver sufficient for police departments, they likely would do just that with higher capacity semi-autos. I think a 6 shot revolver would result in a lot more cops being found incapacitated or dead, with empty guns in their hands.
As far as Beretta 92s for the military goes, they did that, and now they aren't doing it anymore.
But anyway, the idea was to pick one gun for everyone. Not two different guns. So which gun do you think would work for all combat handgun roles better than a Glock?
I'm not sure most people would agree that a DA revolver is easier to clean than a modern polymer semi-auto. Some might say the opposite is true. And I think if "learning your gun" was all that was required to make a 6 shot revolver sufficient for police departments, they likely would do just that with higher capacity semi-autos. I think a 6 shot revolver would result in a lot more cops being found incapacitated or dead, with empty guns in their hands.
As far as Beretta 92s for the military goes, they did that, and now they aren't doing it anymore.
But anyway, the idea was to pick one gun for everyone. Not two different guns. So which gun do you think would work for all combat handgun roles better than a Glock?
That, and we all know the military is run by bureaucrats and bean counters, neither of which have ever set foot in a combat zone in their lives. They don't know which is *better*. All they know is who we need to make allies with and how many pennies we can pinch in the process.
Well, my command chose the Glock to replace the M9 way before "big army" moved to the Sig. My old command elected to stay with the Glock. My understanding is that "big army" didn't want a pistol without an "off switch". I was issued 5 different pistols at different times during my military service (1911, M9, Sig 228, MK23, Glock 19) and opportunities to train with many more pistols. My opinion and the general consensus among my contemporaries is that the Glock was and is ideal for us.
Combat Handgun ? Mmm. You wanna stop your target. 9mm doesn't do that. .357 Magnum does. So.... S&W Mdl 19
Well, that's up for debate. Many people would argue that the 9mm with modern JHPs does that more than adequately. And you might want to consider how many LEOs didn't transition to the .357 mag from the .38 spl precisely because the recoil was too much for them. Now consider that more women are in LE than back during the .357 mag's hayday. The 9mm is now a popular choice because pretty much everyone can shoot it well. But if you think the .357 mag is so much better, how about more than twice the capacity and a faster reload courtesy of the .357 Sig?
Revolvers just don't have what it takes to keep cops safe in this time of social and political division, now that higher capacity firearms are easily available not just to LE, but to criminals too.
Well... from my understanding, and what minute research I've done on it; cops were, generally speaking; more accurate shot for shot with wheelguns than they are with automatics, of any sort. I've spoken to a few local old-timers, and their general consensus is "Of course we were more accurate. We had six shots, twelve spare rounds, and a five minute reload. We made every shot count."
From what I remember back when they made the switch from revolvers to autos, besides the increase in onboard ammo, the increase in accuracy/hits with the autos was one of the big things about going to them.Well... from my understanding, and what minute research I've done on it; cops were, generally speaking; more accurate shot for shot with wheelguns than they are with automatics, of any sort. I've spoken to a few local old-timers, and their general consensus is "Of course we were more accurate. We had six shots, twelve spare rounds, and a five minute reload. We made every shot count."
And honestly, nothing says LEO couldn't care more firepower in the trunk, or in the seat by em. Nothing like a 12ga shotgun or patrol rifle to tip the odds in their favor.
If you spend a little time with any of them, they all are easily shot, and without issue. The grip angle and other complaints you always hear about Glocks, which usually come from people with experience with other things, and no experience with Glocks, quickly go away as you gain familiarity, and you have no troubles switching back and forth.I am sure that if you took away all my other guns and gave me plenty of time and ammo to shoot nothing but a Glock, I would get adequate with it.
But as an individual, you could just leave me my Colt (Smith, Sig) that I can already shoot pretty well. And I am not an A.G.E. so I can do that.
for me you can't beat a CZ 75 Compact. No plastic, it's IMO the most ergonomic handgun ever made, they feed and eject every round they load. For my money CZ makes an affordable, heirloom quality, end of the world reliable handgun.
Heirloom quality It's a stock CZ..
no less so than a Browning Hi Power or a 1911. It's metal, my grandson will be shooting mine. That's heirloom in my book.
What beats a Glock when you're choosing one pistol for everyone?