Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Impact of wolf reintroduction

Discussion in 'Hunting' started by rajb123, Jun 18, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. rajb123

    rajb123 member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2010
    Messages:
    892
    Back in 1990s NYS planned to reintroduce wolfs into Adirondick park which is the largest park in the country. I thought this was a very bad idea at the time and I wrote many politians to tell them to reconsider this plan.

    Unfortunately, this plan did move forward (???) and is being done all out west too. I read recently that out west 60% of the deer and elk heards have been killed by roaming packs of wolves and that legal challenges to stop wolves have been hampered by so-called environmental groups.

    Is there anything to do to stop the continuing damage?
     
  2. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    33,736
    Location:
    Central PA
    We've had some extremely heated threads on that subject which explore the situation in great depth.

    Here's one: http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=635051
    Here's another: http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=606504
    One more: http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=415058
    http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=242579
    http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=204608
    http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=181928
    http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=166431
    http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=149756

    Lots of info packed into those threads. You'll notice most of them are locked now. It seems folks get very VERY emotionally invested in favor or opposition to the animals and management issues. Tough to keep on the High Road.
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2012
  3. 1911Tuner

    1911Tuner Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    May 22, 2003
    Messages:
    18,550
    Location:
    Lexington,North Carolina...or thereabouts
    Wolves don't normally kill for sport. Hunger sparks their predation, and they look for the old and the sick. They're not looking for a fight. They're looking for food that they can take with the least risk to themselves. They'll also kill in order to teach their young.

    A lot of assumed wolf kills are actually Coyotes...and they will kill purely for sport. Contrary to what many people believe, Coyotes will hunt in a pack, and enough of them can take down an Elk by running it in relays until it's exhausted and closing in when it's heart is at the point of bursting. If they don't consume the animal, the wolves come along and scavenge it, or chase the 'Yotes from their kill and take it.
     
  4. ApacheCoTodd

    ApacheCoTodd Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    4,606
    Location:
    Arizona
    I'd say the first thing to do is question the motives of someone stating "...that out west 60% of the deer and elk heards have been killed by roaming packs of wolves ...". Then question the stat and then after calm research, form your own opinion while carefully filtering the over passioned voices of either extreme. The truth, as usual can be found just off center in the middle ground.
     
  5. exbiologist

    exbiologist Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2009
    Messages:
    384
    Location:
    Colorado
    Wow, let's start with the wolf introduction to the Adirondacks... Curious where you got that one
     
  6. drsfmd

    drsfmd Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2009
    Messages:
    828
    There are from time to time credible sightings of wolves in the Adirondacks, but there is no known breeding population... just a few who wander over from Canada from time to time. One was killed near the Sacandaga reservoir a few years ago.

    I'm friends with *the* guy who would be the one in charge of such a reintroduction project if it existed. He told me that it got as far as a few proposals about 7 years ago, but that was the end of it and there are no plans to do a reintroduction anytime soon.
     
  7. exbiologist

    exbiologist Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2009
    Messages:
    384
    Location:
    Colorado
    Exactly.... Rajb123, just take a deep breath, you can disperse the posse
     
  8. Feanor

    Feanor member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2011
    Messages:
    252
    To be perfectly honest, I am sick of confronting the mind numbing ignorance associated with the topic. Gray wolves don't damage the environment, that distinction is reserved for one animal exclusively, the absence of the gray wolf from the adirondacks happens to be a signifcant part of that damage, all courtesy of man!

    BTW OP, its "wolves" not "wolfs" or "woofs" or whatever. You might start overcoming individual ignorance, and irrational fear, by ditching your subscriptions to "Outdoor life," "Petersens hunting," Predator nation, and Guns & Ammo ect..and heading to your local DNR office, or conduct real research on your own.

    A few facts from Wisconsin,

    1. 1.3 - 1.9 million white tail deer(yearly average, nations largest herd)
    2. 32,000 - 40,000 plus black bear, unofficially the largest population in the lower forty eight
    3. 3,000 - 6,000 Bobcat
    4. 16,000 (absolute minimum)coyote
    5. 800 gray wolves
    6. 10,000 - 16,000 (number of deer killed by gray wolves each year in WI)
    7. 500,000 plus, (number of deer killed by humans in WI diring 2011 ten day gun deer season)
    8. 40,000 - 80,000(number of deer killed each year in WI by automobiles)
    9. October 15th to the end of Febuary(length of WI's new wolf hunting season, five months)
    10. Twenty-four hours a day, use of packs of dogs, total darkness penetrating thermal/IR imaging optics, digital callers, and trapping(approved methods of hunting WI gray wolves)
     
  9. ThorinNNY

    ThorinNNY Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    532
    Location:
    3 hours North of Syracuse, 2 hours west of Lake Ch
    For what it`s worth, I spoke to the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation in Watertown NY. While people have discussed re-introducing wolves into New York State no enabling legislation was ever even introduced, let alone passed by the NYS Assembly and Senate.The final step of it becoming a law would have been the governor signing the legislation.
    So the answer is no wolves have been brought into NYS by any branch of government.
    Could a wolf cross the St. Lawrence River-assuming it is frozen over-from Canada into NYS? The possibility cannot be ruled out, but it is highly unlikely
    and likely to be a a time only event.
     
  10. ZeroJunk

    ZeroJunk Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    618
    Location:
    Browns Summit N.C.
    I find it hard to separate the wheat from the chaff as far as internet info on this subject.

    But, most of the people who live or hunt where the wolves were relocated wish they weren't there.

    And as near as I can tell most of the pro wolf types don't live there, have never seen or heard a wolf, and likely never will.
     
  11. drsfmd

    drsfmd Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2009
    Messages:
    828
  12. ThorinNNY

    ThorinNNY Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    532
    Location:
    3 hours North of Syracuse, 2 hours west of Lake Ch
    drsfmd
    Thanks. Interesting article.
     
  13. Feanor

    Feanor member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2011
    Messages:
    252
    FWIW, more facts direct from the source. The only chaff I encounter, emerges from all of the hyperbolic internet rhetoric, such as, "most people who live or hunt where wolves were relocated wish they weren't there!"

     
  14. Feanor

    Feanor member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2011
    Messages:
    252
    More chaff, direct from WDNR,
     
  15. rajb123

    rajb123 member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2010
    Messages:
    892
    I've hunted the Sacandaga area for 15 years.

    So, there was a single wolf in that area in 2001? If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you.
     
  16. ZeroJunk

    ZeroJunk Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    618
    Location:
    Browns Summit N.C.
    I have been going in to wolf country most years for 30 years through either Chotea or Augusta, Montana. Seen them rarely and heard them all the time. Ask any of the ranchers, outfitters, or guides who make a living there what they think about the wolves. And most every body who lives there is involved in one of those three either directly or in support, not being much other place to work.

    They do not want them. Period.

    And the worst chaff comes from those involved in making the original decision. No way their numbers are going to reflect negatively if they can help it.

    There may be no problem in Wisconsin.

    But, the elk herd in Monatana wasn't abundant to begin with and hadn't been since the late 20's.

    I can't see how another predator in addition to bear, coyotes, and mountain lions, and hunters was necessary and the people who live there don't either.

    And those hunters spend a lot more money than somebody with a romantic notion about wolves.
     
  17. exbiologist

    exbiologist Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2009
    Messages:
    384
    Location:
    Colorado
    It was probably air dropped in by the DNR's black helicopters along with grizzlies and mountain lions.
     
  18. gearchecker

    gearchecker Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2009
    Messages:
    294
    Location:
    North Idaho
    Sure there is. Kill them all!
    It sounds rough, but that's just the way it has to be.

    I know many hunters that swear if they're ever lucky enough to see one it’ll be dead before it has a chance to react.
    The attitude out here is simple…”Shoot it and shut up”.

    Out here in Idaho, Wyoming and Montana the wolves have substantially cut the herds of Elk and deer. It's not make believe, or the case of somebody making it up for their political purpose either. It's the plain simple truth, and the wolf has got to be stopped.
    The wolves that were transplanted here are not native to this area, and they hunt without opposition. If you really believe wolves hunt only for food, you're sadly mistaken. They will kill a deer or elk to eat, have a snack and then move on, only to take another, and another, and another. The wolves roam without restriction.
    Come out here any time you like. Wolves can be heard at night regularly. Sure, coyotes kill for sport, but the wolf is doing the most damage to the elk populations. There are now parts of Idaho closed to hunting elk cows, because the populations are so low. Before the wolf was introduced here there was more than enough game for open hunting of bull or cow elk. My FIL has hunted here for 35 years, and last year was the very first year he never saw an elk. No tracks, no scat, nothing to indicate that elk were around. They're gone and they're nowhere to be seen. He's brought an elk home every year since he moved to Idaho. His two hunting partners didn’t get theirs either. That’s a first for all of them
    It's simply because the herds have been decimated due to wolf predation.
    So for all the tree huggers, and wolf lovers here, you'd better take advantage of any chance you have to see one, because they're not going to be around here for much longer if it's at all possible. They're not natural to this area, and they will be eliminated by hunters and ranchers sick of the wolves destroying their livestock and the elk herds.
     
  19. caribou

    caribou Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,582
    Location:
    North West Alaska
    And here in Alaska, where there is and always have been Wolves, we still have NO PROBLEM with them decimating wildlife.

    Then , again, we are not competing with them for limited resources in game, or habitate, as we just havent had our lands fenced off to keep and make $$ on domestic animals , nor is there concret slather'd all over.....

    The habitat of the South is Mucho chango'd since Wolves were first exterminated by ranchers and farmers, , and the vast majority were poisoned, not Hunted. Reintroducing Wolves to the southern 48 might just help remive the inbred, the weak, the Cronic wasteing Disease, Brucilloucios, Lyme disease, and such......gotta look at the benifits, if you cant change it......
     
  20. rajb123

    rajb123 member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2010
    Messages:
    892
    I can't think of a single reason why people or wildlife should be forced to share the earth with wolves.... we got rid of them in the lower 48 +100 years ago for good reason.

    ditto for sharks in the oceans....
     
  21. ZeroJunk

    ZeroJunk Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    618
    Location:
    Browns Summit N.C.
    I'm sure they kill some diseased and weak, but they also kill calves.

    Comparing Alaska to Wisconsin to Montana and Idaho may not be useful.


    If the people who live in the counties effected vote for the reintroduction of wolves I'm all for it.
     
  22. drsfmd

    drsfmd Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2009
    Messages:
    828
    Are you suggesting that you've seen other wolves in that area? Or that the carcass that DEC and the Museum recovered is somehow illegitimate?
     
  23. ThorinNNY

    ThorinNNY Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    532
    Location:
    3 hours North of Syracuse, 2 hours west of Lake Ch
    Well, it seems New York State has managed to survive and thrive despite the absence of wolves for about 100 years now.I wonder if reintroduction should be viewed with a healthy dose of skepticism- in other words treat it as the importation of a non-native species rather than a re-introduction of a species that was once a resident species.At this point, I`m not ready to either endorse or condemn the idea, but I think any decisions of this kind should be made by the people of the individual states involved, not by some Washington DC bureaucrat.I do support removal of wolves from the endangered species list and I strongly believe people have the right protect themselves from predators, both 2 legged and four legged.
    I`d like to thank Sam1911 for bringing those threads to our attention. Lots of food for thought there.
     
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2012
  24. Feanor

    Feanor member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2011
    Messages:
    252
    My friend, there is/was no problem in Montana either, or Idaho for that matter. The problems are human generated, with a very very tiny & loud, wealthy, and very very powerful special interest group controlling the dialogue via their proxy control of, rural small town America, and their death grip on congress!

    I live dead center in the northern blue hills of northwest Wisconsin, I am in the field almost every single day, tracking, and imaging gray wolves, I'm one of a tiny handful of men who monitors the blue hills packs, and I can tell you in no uncertain terms that what problems do arrise, emerge from highly irresponsible, and entitlement minded agriculturists, who are all heavilly subsidized by "we the people" to ply their trade! Often, fraud is involved, or another species, such as coyotes!

    I know farmers that are the most ethical people one could ever hope to meet, men/women who live as I do, dead center of gray wolf range in northwest Wisconsin, and they have never had even a whiff of trouble from these animals. I also know of a fraudster north of Danbury, a man that was bannered by the media as having had the highest rate of gray wolf depredation in the entire nation(90 plus cattle a year), USA-Today ran articles about his misfortune with the evil, murderous gray wolves eating his poor cattle, problem was it was all lies!

    But we never hear about that, no, we hear from the so-called "sport hunting media" how evil, and merciless the nasty gray wolf is, how they just kill for fun, and how a granny out west, blew a charging evil wolf away with her trusty .44(another lie recently published in Outdoor Life). I confronted "Skip Knowles" who is the editor of "Predator Nation" about a spectacular bit of hyperbole that appeared in the publications winter/spring issue, he personally penned it, an account in which he wildly declared that he had spoken with a Yellowstone wildlife biologist who had personally witnessed gray wolves kill and eat three mountain lions, in a single day! Don't believe me, look it up, it was published as an editorial by Mr Knowles, he refused to reply to my challenge to name the biologist, this because there wasn't one, he just made it up, and then published it in the magazine, which his readership then ignorantly soaked up as truth. He ended his editorial by demanding that we pursue our "right" to kill the evil gray wolves! Which they have now done.

    As a hunter, its very frustrating to say the least, I for one, am sick of this mindset, you could overcome your ignorance by filling your head with "the real scientific data" on the gray wolf in America, how important it is at stopping disease, disease that crosses over, and back and forth between ungulates, but of course, you actually have to take the time to read the data. I promise you, you will come away from it with a new appreciation for this animal, and a very healthy dose of scepticism for the cattlemans associations standard propaganda lines.
     
  25. Feanor

    Feanor member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2011
    Messages:
    252
    The truth^^^^.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page