Cosmoline
Member
There seems to be a great deal of confusion about the distinction between the GHWB 1989 import ban on certain "non sporting" firearms and the Clinton era Assault Weapons Ban. And you can count me among the confused. The issue comes for example when discussing the legality of putting a bayonet on an SKS that was imported after the import ban. Obviously the AWB outlawed certain firearms completely, but that's history now. The question I have is can anyone point me to the law which outlaws possession or use of firearms that were imported with certain features and subsequently changed back to their original configuration using non-imported parts or home-made parts? I've searched and cannot locate any such law, but the CW seems to be that it is illegal to do this.
As far as I can tell, the import ban applies only to importers, and would have no continuing effect on the firearm once its stateside, apart from 27 CFR 178.39, which is the provision making it illegal to assemble an otherwise non-importable firearm from imported parts.
Here's the specific issue that's come to my mind. I have an SKS with a bayonet lug and no bayonet. As far as I can tell it has 100% Chicom parts. Bayonets, oddly enough, don't seem to be on the list of parts under 178.39. So it looks like I'd be fine sticking a bayonet on the thing, from whatever country. Or would that be "assembling" a new firearm, and make it necessary for me to go back and count parts?
From what I can see, the import restrictions changed again and again over the years. Assuming this one is a 1992 SKS, and was imported then without a bayonet, I believe I would not be allowed to put a bayonet on it no matter where the bayonet was made. But then again, I cannot find the actual text of the import restrictions in question, and the BATF appears to have changed the import rules back and forth over the years. Sometimes they let non C&R SKS's in with bayonets, but during the Clinton years they did not. How can I be bound by whatever agreement some feds came to with some long gone importer 15 years ago?
As far as I can tell, the import ban applies only to importers, and would have no continuing effect on the firearm once its stateside, apart from 27 CFR 178.39, which is the provision making it illegal to assemble an otherwise non-importable firearm from imported parts.
Here's the specific issue that's come to my mind. I have an SKS with a bayonet lug and no bayonet. As far as I can tell it has 100% Chicom parts. Bayonets, oddly enough, don't seem to be on the list of parts under 178.39. So it looks like I'd be fine sticking a bayonet on the thing, from whatever country. Or would that be "assembling" a new firearm, and make it necessary for me to go back and count parts?
From what I can see, the import restrictions changed again and again over the years. Assuming this one is a 1992 SKS, and was imported then without a bayonet, I believe I would not be allowed to put a bayonet on it no matter where the bayonet was made. But then again, I cannot find the actual text of the import restrictions in question, and the BATF appears to have changed the import rules back and forth over the years. Sometimes they let non C&R SKS's in with bayonets, but during the Clinton years they did not. How can I be bound by whatever agreement some feds came to with some long gone importer 15 years ago?