Info needed on new S&W M37's w bobbed hammer?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Frank1991

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2005
Messages
70
THe new M37's that are hitting the shelves with the bobbed hammer and no MIM parts or lock - just wondering from someone that has purchased one if they are stamped as being +p or not?
 
Mal H said:
No, they're not stamped +P. However, the S&W site indicates they are +P rated.


Yes, however these guns were a special order. If they were +p rated wouldn't they put "+p" on the barrel. I have a brand new 642 that specifically says "+p" on the barrel.
 
You would think so, but if you look closely at the large picture on the S&W site, the stamping is the same as on mine - ".38 S&W Spl." No +P. Yet the text indicates they are.

With the all steel cylinder and barrel, I wouldn't hesitate to use a limited amount of +P in it. Certainly for carrying, it should be ok. I plan to use only relatively light reloads for practice with the occassional +P and carry +P.

You do raise a good point. Maybe a call to S&W concerning this specific revolver is in order.
 
Mal H said:
You would think so, but if you look closely at the large picture on the S&W site, the stamping is the same as on mine - ".38 S&W Spl." No +P. Yet the text indicates they are.

With the all steel cylinder and barrel, I wouldn't hesitate to use a limited amount of +P in it. Certainly for carrying, it should be ok. I plan to use only relatively light reloads for practice with the occassional +P and carry +P.

You do raise a good point. Maybe a call to S&W concerning this specific revolver is in order.


Then why do you think that S&W would stamp some of their barrels with "+p" (as in my case with my new 642) and others such as the M37 without the "+p" on it if they are rated as being +p rated?
 
Mine does not have +P stamped on it.

I've read somewhere on the net that some do, though. Probably S&W getting rid of parts, if true.

Regardless, moderate +P usage won't hurt them. Folks have been plinking with wadcutters and occassionally shooting and carrying stouter loads for decades.
 
The barrel on mine does no have +P marked on it. In addition, mine has the older frame design with the pressed-in cylinder stop lug versus the new J-Magnum frame with the lug machined as an integral part of the frame.

As such, mine will not see any +P rounds. I will make do with standard velocity 120-something grain Nyclad rounds from my stash. If I want to run +P in a snubbie, I will use my older M640, not an Airweight.
 
In one of my most fortunate moves (blind luck on my part), I picked up a S&W 642-1 several years ago, NIB, because there were some really great deals on them. It is NOT marked "+P," but several references I've checked confirm the 642-1 IS rated OK for +P; S&W just hadn't started marking the barrels yet! I believe the 642-2 is so marked.

I have no reservations carrying mine with the same ol' +P "FBI load" I started using as a cop, back in the 70s. I don't shoot many of these at a time, more for my sake than for the gun's sake! If I ever need it "for real," I suspect a sore hand will be the least of my worries.

Mine also has the more durable finish on the alloy frame (that doesn't "exactly" match the stainless barrel & cylinder, but hat also doesn't flake off...), and doesn't seem to have that strange lock above the cylinder release . . .

It's good to be smart, but better to be lucky!! :D
 
They are not +P rated, officially. They are not built on the J-magnum frame. But a person from S&W said its OK to use limited +P. If you put a cylinder of +P through it a couple of times a year I'm sure it would be OK.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top