1) Israel is not just about a place to live, they also feel that the area of the world they are in is the Holy Land. Why should only Muslims be allowed to live in their "Holy Land"
2) Israel didn't spend the 6 months prior to obtaining nuclear weapons ranting and raving about how it was hoping for the desruction of it's neighbors.
3) But that's exactly what you are suggesting. Moving Israel to Europe would mean that some people would be displaced.
Why is it that the way of war "to the victor belong the spoils" applies to everyone except Israel. Right or wrong they fought a war for the land they currently hold. Why should they move? The US fought a war to obtain our land, should we give it back to England? Should all territories ever taken in hostilities be returned to their previous owners? Of course not.
Israel fought, and won, a war for the land they currently hold. If another nation wishes to go to war to retake that land, they must deal with Israel and her allies. If Mexico decided they wanted Texas back (although some might say they already have it) would we not expect the US to stomp that idea flat?
If we needed help from our allies to hold our territory would they not come to our aid?
What's the difference, why does Israel have to play by special rules?