Is this legal? Changing the trademarks on a rifle

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hostile Amish

member
Joined
Jun 7, 2008
Messages
522
I recently have been to a gun show that had a very interesting AR15. This AR15 had it's trademarks on the magazine well ground down and replaced with a picturesque Walther trademark. Also inscripted/engraved on the magazine well was "Walther WA15 kal. 223 Remington." ON the other side was engraved "Carl Walther Ulm/Do" and "Made in Germany."

I know for a face Walther does NOT produce an AR-15, but I was wondering if this process is illegal to do (changing or destroying firearm trademarks).
 
I would wonder with the whole S&W partnership and the M&P AR's there might be some crazy shennanigans going on with Walther AR's but I have no idea.

If it says Walther and it's not it's called fraud!
 
2RCO, is that like the Walther P99s that were totally produced by Smith & Wesson (and had no S&W markings)?

If it says "Walther" and license fees weren't paid, it sounds like a legal issue.

Who are they defrauding?
 
this doesn't sound right. hey, maybe put the ford symbol on an ar and say it was made durning ww2
 
If my memory serves me there were a limited number of Armalite AR-10s made with Walther barrels. Dunno about any .223 rifles
 
You can do anything you like with the markings, so long as you don't mess with the serial number.

Not quite. You can do anything you like with the markings, so long as you don't mess with the required BATFE markings, of which Serial number, caliber, manufacturer and location are included.
 
Going far out there...possible that it was exported to Germany for civilian use, "remanufactured", and then imported back?
 
How is it fraud if no defrauding is taking place? I think it would be an issue if one tried to sell it as a Walther. Otherwise, its like placing a Mercedes symbol on a Prius... just tacky.
 
See post #10 again.

It's against federal law to deface or change the manufactures name on a firearm.

rc
 
2RCO, is that like the Walther P99s that were totally produced by Smith & Wesson (and had no S&W markings)?

I should have phrased this better. What I was trying to say was maybe it was some new S&W gimmick and possibly "really a Walther" just like those p99s, but if it wasn't and was just made up by some clown the it's in violation of the law.
 
trademarks on the magazine well ground down and replaced with a picturesque Walther trademark.
IF S&W wanted a Walther marked AR-15 lower, I'm pretty confident they wouldn't do it that way!

rc
 
Not quite. You can do anything you like with the markings, so long as you don't mess with the required BATFE markings, of which Serial number, caliber, manufacturer and location are included
after i quick look through my federal fiearms regulations reference guide i could only find that you couldn't modify or remove the serial number. there was nothing in it about not being able to remove the manufacture & caliber markings.
if you can find the regulation in your books or on atf's website i would like to see it or at least know in what section its located in.
builders of custom rifles commonly surface grind the receivers to remove manufacture markings.
 
dirtyjim said:
rdhood said:
Not quite. You can do anything you like with the markings, so long as you don't mess with the required BATFE markings, of which Serial number, caliber, manufacturer and location are included
after i quick look through my federal fiearms regulations reference guide i could only find that you couldn't modify or remove the serial number. there was nothing in it about not being able to remove the manufacture & caliber markings.
if you can find the regulation in your books or on atf's website i would like to see it or at least know in what section its located in.
builders of custom rifles commonly surface grind the receivers to remove manufacture markings.
The markings only have to be present on them from the manufacturer.

After that, "don't mess with the serial number" applies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top