Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Is this legal? Changing the trademarks on a rifle

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Hostile Amish, Mar 28, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Hostile Amish

    Hostile Amish member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Messages:
    522
    I recently have been to a gun show that had a very interesting AR15. This AR15 had it's trademarks on the magazine well ground down and replaced with a picturesque Walther trademark. Also inscripted/engraved on the magazine well was "Walther WA15 kal. 223 Remington." ON the other side was engraved "Carl Walther Ulm/Do" and "Made in Germany."

    I know for a face Walther does NOT produce an AR-15, but I was wondering if this process is illegal to do (changing or destroying firearm trademarks).
     
  2. nalioth

    nalioth Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2007
    Messages:
    5,841
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    You can do anything you like with the markings, so long as you don't mess with the serial number.
     
  3. WardenWolf

    WardenWolf member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    5,884
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    It's called fraud. If you label and market it as something it's not, it's in violation of counterfeit / fraud laws.
     
  4. 2RCO

    2RCO Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,479
    Location:
    Missouri
    I would wonder with the whole S&W partnership and the M&P AR's there might be some crazy shennanigans going on with Walther AR's but I have no idea.

    If it says Walther and it's not it's called fraud!
     
  5. nalioth

    nalioth Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2007
    Messages:
    5,841
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    2RCO, is that like the Walther P99s that were totally produced by Smith & Wesson (and had no S&W markings)?

    If it says "Walther" and license fees weren't paid, it sounds like a legal issue.

    Who are they defrauding?
     
  6. Guero4179

    Guero4179 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    62
    Location:
    FL
    Not just fraud but totally tacky.
     
  7. ultradoc

    ultradoc Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,118
    Location:
    Ohio
    this doesn't sound right. hey, maybe put the ford symbol on an ar and say it was made durning ww2
     
  8. Floppy_D

    Floppy_D Member In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,156
    Location:
    NAS Pensacola
    Maybe, but where will you get parts for it in a few years? :evil:
     
  9. marktx

    marktx Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2007
    Messages:
    629
    Location:
    Texas
    If my memory serves me there were a limited number of Armalite AR-10s made with Walther barrels. Dunno about any .223 rifles
     
  10. rdhood

    rdhood Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2007
    Messages:
    943
    Not quite. You can do anything you like with the markings, so long as you don't mess with the required BATFE markings, of which Serial number, caliber, manufacturer and location are included.
     
  11. Wes Janson

    Wes Janson Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,962
    Going far out there...possible that it was exported to Germany for civilian use, "remanufactured", and then imported back?
     
  12. Gaiudo

    Gaiudo Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,612
    Location:
    Durham, NC
    How is it fraud if no defrauding is taking place? I think it would be an issue if one tried to sell it as a Walther. Otherwise, its like placing a Mercedes symbol on a Prius... just tacky.
     
  13. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    See post #10 again.

    It's against federal law to deface or change the manufactures name on a firearm.

    rc
     
  14. 2RCO

    2RCO Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,479
    Location:
    Missouri
    I should have phrased this better. What I was trying to say was maybe it was some new S&W gimmick and possibly "really a Walther" just like those p99s, but if it wasn't and was just made up by some clown the it's in violation of the law.
     
  15. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    IF S&W wanted a Walther marked AR-15 lower, I'm pretty confident they wouldn't do it that way!

    rc
     
  16. dirtyjim

    dirtyjim Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,152
    Location:
    alvin texas
    after i quick look through my federal fiearms regulations reference guide i could only find that you couldn't modify or remove the serial number. there was nothing in it about not being able to remove the manufacture & caliber markings.
    if you can find the regulation in your books or on atf's website i would like to see it or at least know in what section its located in.
    builders of custom rifles commonly surface grind the receivers to remove manufacture markings.
     
  17. nalioth

    nalioth Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2007
    Messages:
    5,841
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    The markings only have to be present on them from the manufacturer.

    After that, "don't mess with the serial number" applies.
     
  18. ACBMWM3

    ACBMWM3 member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    308
    Location:
    Western Washington
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page