Isn't the 44 Special for defense just awesome?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tipoc: I am a bit hazy on this stuff. Been awhile since I did research on it.

So, let's see. You say I inflate velocities, but, support that their is a bit of a
dispute, saying the 250-260 grain loads might have been going faster(goes in other room and pets .45 Super with Buffalobore 255 grain bullets at 1090 fps).

The .45 Colt was the standard. It worked against horses, and, WITH A SOFT LEAD BULLET,was devastating on humans. Let's be clear that my conflict is created by BULLET TYPE. Everyone wants to discuss this like a LFN is the same as a pure lead cast bullet. THEY ARE NOT, AND, the results are hugely different, penetration wise.

JMB was designing a military firearm, and ammunition.

From the Hague convention of 1899:
"...Declare as follows:
The Contracting Parties agree to abstain from the use of bullets which expand or flatten easily in the human body, such as bullets with a hard envelope which does not entirely cover the core, or is pierced with incisions.
The present Declaration is only binding for the Contracting Powers in the case of a war between two or more of them.
It shall cease to be binding from the time when, in a war between the Contracting Parties, one of the belligerents is joined by a non-Contracting Power.
The present Declaration shall be ratified as soon as possible.
The ratification shall be deposited at The Hague..."

The 1911 was used by US forces from 1911, surprise,:D, to the current day, and, it was designed for the conditions prescribed in the Hague, non-expanding bullets.

Also keep in mind the M1873 SAA .45 Colt was pressed back into action because the .38 was not stopping the Moros, in the Philippine-American War.
The heavier .45 Colt bullets did do the job on the Moros, however.
The .38 kind of reminds me of the .44 special anemic loads:
150 grains at 777 fps.

So, when I say a 200 grain bullet is adequate at 950 fps-1200 fps, that is for a NON-EXPANDING BULLET.

Tipoc, you point out that the 45 ACP load was developed to mimic the .45 Colt load. However, the key point here is the Hague convention was being inacted, and, the soft lead bullets that had made the .45 Colts reputation where now being replaced by non-expanding bullets, I think a very big point.
With the lighter bullets, 200 grains, and higher velocity, you still get excellent penetration, with a flat point bullet, which I believe was JMB's original design. I trust that JMB knew what he was doing, and, that the 200 grain flat point would do damage similar to the .45 Colt, if it was loaded with a non-expanding bullet.

I maintain that to get adequate penetration with a large caliber, 240 grain bullets are the place to start. Taffin has had excellent luck with even 225 grain bullets, but at around 1100 fps, with the .44 special. If I was going to use an EXPANDING BULLET for the .44 special, I would follow his lead, and use 240 grain or heavier hollow points for defense, and, see no reason why not 1050-1100 fps, using 4227.

There seems to be a considerable increase in wound channel size when going from 770 fps, the anemic 246 grain soft lead .44 special load, and moving up to a 240 grain expanding bullet, moving 1100 fps. I've always thought I would still get the same penetration with a 200 grain flat point, moving faster say 950-1100 fps, as I did with the 230 grain ball at 850 fps. I also think the wound channel would be considerably larger with the lighter bullet, moving faster.

Here is a rather nice shot by Cottonstalk, on a deer with a .45 Colt WFN at 1150 fps.
45deer011.gif

Now, I see no reason you can't get that kind of wound channel with a 200 grain bullet, non-expanding, out of the 45 ACP. With Longshot, you can move
a 200 grain bullet at 1013 fps, at 17K. I think JMB had shot enough deer to figure out that he would get an effect like the above, using that weight bullet. The fallacy is that when you make the bullet expanding, you give up your speed through the target, and, your wound channel, while bigger in the front, does not maintain it's size through the target.

So, in short:
.44 Special, for me, would be best with non-expanding 185-200 grain or heavier bullets, moving in the 1000-1100 fps range. However, why not use a 240 grain non-expanding bullet? 4227 gives you nearly the same velocity with a 240 grain bullet as the lighter ones?
If you are going to load expanding bullets, they better be heavy. 240 grains is a good place to start. THIS is my complaint about the .44 Special as a self-defense weapon: The ammo makers just don't care, or just don't get it. The factory .44 special offerings are too light for an expanding bullet. Besides, handloading those big, 240 grain HP's gives me the warm and fuzzies.:D You KNOW that bullet is going to do the trick.

"Quote:
At a combat distance of 15 yards or less, this caliber will stop the bad guy in his tracks.
In your dreams. There is NO handgun round which will "stop the bad guy in his tracks" unless it's a lucky shot that hits the CNS.

No handgun round for defense is "just awesome". Most of them are good, but nothing is a sure stop. You have been reading too much hype"

This used to be true, but isn't anymore.

I have a number of calibers, that, when loaded correctly, will hit like a .375 H&H rifle, something I also have. Below is commentary by a handgun hunting expert, jwp475, who has taken LOTS of game with large bore handguns.
I had the Speer 275 grain HP's loaded for defense loads. They expand to the size of a 2 bore rifle,
quartersand275grainbullet.gif
and, at 1560 fps, would have an EXCELLENT chance of
being the most effective handgun stopping round ever made. They have made 4" across holes on entry in deer. Destroys a lot of meat, an excellent one shot stop defense round.


"
.500 JRH:
Factory 950 fps, 440 grain LFN cast bullet
the other factory load:
425 grains at 1350 fps?

MikeG on Shooters Forum has shot that load through the chest cavity of about an 850 pouund Buffalo and had an exit with the 440 at 950 FPS. I have shot the 425 grainer completely through both shoulders of an Asian Buffalo and broke the main support bone with an exit. Jack has shot the 440 grainer bullet at 1380 FPS ened to end with an exit of a Buffalo of about 800 pounds

.475 Linebaugh

275 Grain Speer Hollow point, at 1450-1560 fps
325 grain Speer Flat points at 1450 fps

I have not tested either of those bullets, with the light wieghts and the probability of excessive expansion I am skeptical of their usefulness in a 475 Linebaugh. One truly does not need nor want a lot of expansion at the expense of penetration with a true big bore revolver

.500 Linebaugh
350 grain LFN at 1350 fps
435 grain LFN at 1100 fps

No experience with a 350 grainer, but if the 435 is a true LBT design then it will work very well

.500 Linebaugh Maximum
525 grains LFN over 29 grains of 296: chrono said 1350 fps,
but, it might have been off?


The 525 grain WLFN (by Cast Performance) bullet out of the 500 Linebaugh is the hammer of Thor on game of all sizes in my experience. Truly a heavy hitter"

As to the effect of the 375 H&H, with expanding bullets, on humans. I could only find one shooting. This was an accidental discharge, while hunting, from behind. The bullet hit in the shoulder area, and
severed the vein, artery, bones, pretty much everything, and pretty much took the poor man's arm off. He bleed to death before they could get him to a hospital.
 
Last edited:
Prosser,

You are right that the super handgun rounds (those above 44 magnum) are pretty effective but those are not normally used for self defense (and are bigger guns than most would carry concealed). I would also begin to worry about overpenetration :)

But even then, do you get an immediate stop without a CNS shot or breaking the pelvis? The deer I shot with a 300 gr 44 mag ran about 50 yards before he dropped.

I definitely agree that they would have the penetration (even with expansion and clothing) to reach the CNS.

Maybe we need to start a movement toward Linebaugh calibers and Ruger .480/SW 500. for concealed carry use :D
 
It would certainly reduce crime. If someone was pointing a .500 Caliber FA 83
at me, and I was criminal, I would become an ex-criminal, very fast.;)

I was looking through Brassfetcher, and found this .44 magnum loading:

http://www.brassfetcher.com/Federal 240 grain Hydra-Shok.html

Take off about 60 fps, and, you have what I believe is one of the better self-defense rounds, EVER. Even with fairly limited expansion, you can see the kind of devastation this combination provides, plus, it penetrates like crazy. The .44 Special is capable of this combination, if properly loaded.

The .44 Special, is pretty near perfect. It can move the bullets fast enough to create a very large wound channel, 1000-1100 fps, and, that seems to be about perfect, with much more velocity not really increasing the wound channel much.
 
Ken451:
So, you think they are too big to carry?
ALL of these guns were done by Jack Huntington Advanced Gunsmithing:

The king of all snubbies a 50-110 BFR:
BFR.jpg

Here is a snubbie .500 S&W. I'd probably fire .500 JRH out of it.
500SWsnubby4Jacks121406029.jpg

Here is my little girl, in .500JRH:
VERY packable:

FA83RH500JRH852010.jpg

And last, but not least, Hellboy:
Safarikid's snubbie, .500JRH, 275 grain Barnes X type bullets, at around 1500 fps

HELLBOY.jpg HELLBOY3.jpg

They all are very packable, if not shootable:D
 
How do you do follow up shots with a broken hand :eek:

Double taps? 2+1?

The SW500 snubbie at least ought to blind everyone! I just don't see the practicality of a super magnum in a snubbie. AFAIK, it takes more barrel than that to attain good velocity. But it is a neat looking gun :) I notice you say "I will probably fire..." Does that mean you haven't fired it yet?

Looks like the shortest FA is a 4.75" and the shortest Linebaugh is a 4". Neither seem to list weights :uhoh:
 
Not your grandma's .44 Special.......................................................................:D
DSC05273.jpg
[/IMG]
 
SharpsdressedMan: I LOVE that snubbie:D

The real advantage of these big bores is with bullets over 350 grains, and tight crimps, the right powders, you can get velocity about the same as a 5-7" barrel.

For example, I test shot one of these guns with .500 JRH ammo. Similar to the .500 S&W snubbie, but, a custom built on a Ruger SRH. It had a 2 inch barrel, and, it ran nearly the same velocity as the full sized gun, with a 5" barrel or so.

The snubbie was in the 1250-1300 fps range, the full sized gun at 1350, and, a 16" David Clay rifle only slightly faster. They did kick a little, since it's a 425 grain LFN bullet.

That said, I use 440 grain 950 fps .500 caliber loads in my girl. Not ideal for SD,
but
"MikeG on Shooters Forum has shot that load through the chest cavity of about an 850 pouund Buffalo and had an exit with the 440 at 950 FPS. I have shot the 425 grainer completely through both shoulders of an Asian Buffalo and broke the main support bone with an exit. Jack has shot the 440 grainer bullet at 1380 FPS ened to end with an exit of a Buffalo of about 800 pounds". I suppose it would put a good sized hole, turning bone to shrapnel,
as it goes through at full speed...Wound channel should be 1", all the way through, with the edition of secondary fragmentation if bone is contacted.

Also, the 950 fps 440 grain load gets full velocity out of the short barreled guns. Safarikid did some Barnes 275 grain expanding all brass bullets, and was getting near 1500 fps out of Hellboy.
With lighter bullets, if used at close range, you can also get devastating blast, and, a fireball that would light up and scar the bad guy.
 
The bottom line on packing the snubbie 500 is the weight. I started with the 8&3/8" monster (a real boat anchor), then got the 4", but I had so much fun firing the round, that I ditched the big ones and got the then-new 2 3/4" barreled snubbie. I handload, so I just kept upping the charge til I'd had enough (seems to be about 1120-1150fps with the Remington 385gr, but that is clocked from the short barrel). Not the hottest thing you can shoot from a comped gun, but remember what this "little" gun is.....light and uncompensated. For a true concealed, defensive use of the the gun, I load a 440gr flatpoint lead @ 700-750fps, and this is one hell of a kick butt round. The gun still weighs about 6-7oz. more than a six inch Model 29 S&W (the Dirty Harry gun), but isn't too bad to carry if you use a 1 3/4" belt and a well designed holster (Sparks HSR). If one needs a "one hot stopper", a full half inch, 440gr flatpoint pill is just what the doctor ordered. Even if the bad guy is wearing a vest, the crush ought to have the front panel in close proximity of the rear panel after impact. Who needs armor piercing ammo?
 
To ask why seems to indicate a lack of common sense. All things being equal, it would be alot harder to justify having to shoot someone at that distance than at say 5-10 feet.

Why?

Think it through some.
 
Last edited:
Prosser you are so far off it's hard to know where to begin to straighten your curly lines out. I won't try. You seem to argue against yourself post to post.

To put it bluntly your problem with the 44 Special is that it is not the 45 Linebaugh or even the 44 Mag. It is true the Special is not those. You have to get over that. The Special is it's own round and not anemic at all. Those of us who fancy the Special know that it is not and appreciate what it is.

It's interesting to me that in a thread about the .44 Special a good many detest this caliber and round so much that they can't wait to discuss the .357 Magnum or the 454 Cassull.

So let's be clear. If you want a well balanced round for self defense that holds 5 rounds in a gun the size of an L frame and 6 rounds in a N frame or a Colt SAA the 44 Spl. could be for you. If you want a round that will cleanly take any game in the lower 48 out to normal handgun ranges than the .44 Spl. will do that and does it well. These things will require different loads and different bullets but that is just part of the game.

tipoc
 
All I can really say is you didn't read what I wrote, or don't get what I'm trying to say. I don't blame you. That was a bit longer then I wanted, as well, but, your questions deserved proper answers.

Let's see if I can be simple:
the .44 Special, in the right gun, with the right loads, does everything one might want in a cartridge, and does it with VERY low pressure.

It is a VERY capable round, and I would be fine with it, anytime, as long as I can find the right gun, and, load the right rounds.

Anemic is a word I use for the VERY slow .44 Special loads that have been offered by some of the ammo companies.

Properly loaded the .44 Special is all that, and a bag of chips.

For defense, the .44 Special exceeds the .45 ACP, can come very close to .44 Magnum loads, and does this with loads at 17k.
 
Prosser I apologize for being crude. I should have read more closely.

tipoc
 
tipoc: thanks.

The .44 Special is such an endearing cartridge. Loading those 240 grain HP's for my bulldog, and driving tacks with them, with relatively low recoil was a real joy, and, I now know my instincts were correct: the .44 special, at that level, is no joke.

However, if you lower the velocity you seriously lower the wound channel, both in diameter, and length. A .6" wound channel is seriously lame compared to a 1.0" wound channel, that blows through the entire target, thanks to the heavy bullet, and 1000-1100 fps velocity.

When I was loading for it, the bulldog was the entire dog and pony show, and, it was not up to either the loads, or the volume I wanted to shoot through my SD gun. The Detonics Mark VI gave me better ballistics, and, the gun lasted far longer, with a larger bullet.

By the way: .452" 200 grain speer flying ashtrays, at 1200 fps, blow some very nice holes in bad guys. If you are going to use a 200 grain bullet in a .44 special, it should be going 1100-1200 fps to justify using that light a bullet.
 
DM, you shoot someone at a range of 35-50yds. and you better have a REAL good lawyer to defend you.

If someone shoots at me from 35 or 50 yards, they should expect, and will get shot by me!

If a dog comes after me at those ranges, i won't be waiting until it gets to 10' before i kill it either.

DM
 
If you want a round that will cleanly take any game in the lower 48 out to normal handgun ranges than the .44 Spl. will do that and does it well. These things will require different loads and different bullets but that is just part of the game.

Did you forget that there's big bears and moose in the lower 48? I've taken moose with a 44 mag, and also much other big game. I wouldn't even consider a 44 spl. for those jobs... Not even for elk...

I do love the 44 spl., but i also came to the conclusion long ago, if you don't handload it, speeding it up, the 357 mag. is a better defense cartridge at 50 yards.

DM
 
'Twas said:

All things being equal, it would be alot harder to justify having to shoot someone at that distance than at say 5-10 feet.

Which prompted the question:



And suggested:

Think it through some.

In most jurisdictions, the justifiable use of lethal force dictates that the danger must be iminent and unavoidable and that the aggressor possess both the will and the means and that he demonstrate the intent to carry out the threat. Moreover, the threat must be grave...placing the reasonable man in fear for his life or of serious bodily injury.

At 20 feet, it's much easier to show that the threat is iminent and unavoidable. At 50 yards...not so simple unless he's armed with a gun and taking aim, or has actually fired the opening salvo. Not all lethal threats involve the use of a gun, however. A knife or blunt weapon satisfies the means, and possibly the will and the intent...but unless he's close enough to bring it into play...it doesn't satisfy the iminent and unavoidable part of the equation.

Let me state for the record that I believe that the 21 foot rule should be extended to the 30-foot rule under certain circumstances. 21 feet is too close for comfort when facing a young agile attacker armed with a knife or baseball bat. If it's an old, fat man...21 is probably enough.

Even if he has a gun and is firing on you...the situation will be judged on its individual merits. If you're cornered with no way out, or standing in the open...you have a viable defense. If you have an opportunity to escape, but willfully engage in a duel across a parking lot...you're coming onto shaky ground. You may be exonerated, but then again...you may not be. Painting with such a wide brush is a good way to find that you need a gallon of paint stripper.

All this does tend to suggest that the rights of the attacker are in better stead than the defender...and that's a pretty sad commentary...but it's the world that we live in.
 
Funny, but I just got these by email today: Look Like McNett has come up with some very nice 44 special loads, as has Tim Sundles at Buffalobore
.44 Special 200gr. Barnes TACXP Lead Free 20rds $27.95

An outstanding load for personal defense. This loading uses standard pressure. You can use it in any .44 Special that is in good condition! This powerful loading comes in boxes of 20!

Caliber : .44 Special

Bullet : 200gr. Barnes TAC-XP Lead Free

Ballistics : 1000fps - 538 ft./lbs. - 5.5" bbl.
900fps 2.5" bbl
1250fps from a Win. 1894AE 16" trapper carbine

.44 Special 180gr. JHP 20rds $20.00

An outstanding load for personal defense. This loading uses standard pressure. You can use it in any .44 Special that is in good condition! This powerful loading comes in boxes of 20!

Caliber : .44 Special

Bullet : 180gr. Remington® JHP

Ballistics : 1150fps - 529 ft./lbs. - 5.5" bbl.
1050fps 2.5" bbl
1395fps from a Win. 1894AE 16" trapper carbine

Buffalobore:

Heavy .44 Special Ammo - 180 gr. J.H.P. (1,150 fps/M.E. 543 ft.lbs.) - 50 Round Box - (personal defense load)

Real Gun Velocities

1. 6" Ruger .44 Magnum Super Blackhawk

a. Item #14A - 1203 fps
b. Item #14B - 1044 fps

2. 3.25" S&W Model 396

a. Item #14A - 1155 fps
b. Item #14B - 984 fps

Note: This Heavy .44 Special ammunition can be fired in every .44 Special or .44 Magnum gun made EXCEPT CHARTER ARMS .44 SPECIAL BULLDOG.

Funny, but Buffalobore gets the 255's going pretty much as fast as the lighter bullets:

Heavy .44 Special Ammo - 255 gr.S.W.C.(Keith-type)G.C.(1,000fps/M.E.566 ft.lbs.) - 20 Round Box - (for big game up to 500 lbs.)




Note: This Heavy .44 Special ammunition can be fired in every .44 Special or .44 Magnum gun made EXCEPT CHARTER ARMS .44 SPECIAL BULLDOG.
 
Last edited:
For what it's worth I think the S&W 296, .44 special 5 shot L-frame snub is the best answer to CCW with a snubby revolver, for my personal needs.

Mr. Camp (may he rest in peace) produced some very interesting data on the Corbon DPX round, weighing in at 200 grains and sporting a Barnes X-bullet.

Corbon lists the velocity of the round @ 950 fps out of a 4" Barrel. Mr. Camp chronographed the round from a 3" barrel with the following results:

Here are the velocities for each of those shots in ft/sec: 1006, 1012, 1027, 1046, 1034, 987, 1019, 998, 998, and 1004.

From these results we can safely assume that out of the 2.5" barrel of the 296, the Corbon DPX round will meet or exceed the published velocity of 950 fps.

Without going into the intricacies of self-defense shooting, I am very pleased to have the 296 matched with 5 DPX rounds and 2 extra speedloaders in my cargo pocket with a Mika's pocket holster.

Is the .44 special the best round ever? Maybe, maybe not, depending on how you define best. But most will agree it is quite handy, has a place in firearms history, and with the right load is extremely viable in a self defense situation. I can't think of a better CCW option for my needs at this point in time.

DSC02666.gif

DSC02792.gif

DSC02626.gif

Velocity data retrieved from http://www.hipowersandhandguns.com/Corbon 44 Special DPX Report.htm
 
Anybody try out the new Buffalo Bore Anti-Personel 44 Spl yet? Or the new
190 gr. Lead hollow point. I been using the Blazer 200 gr GD and like it , But
always looking for something better. Got some old handloads I loaded up with
2400 powder with a 200 gr JHP at around 1150-1200 fps. These are a real blast
to shoot in short barrel guns in more ways than one. These are 40 yrs old.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top