ITFS 1 class

Status
Not open for further replies.

Owen

Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
6,060
Location
Burlington, VT
Point Shooting
This weekend I drove up to Knoxville to take an introductory point shooting class with Robin Brown, aka Brownie. The class was ITFS 1.

I went because I am a sighted shooter. I have always trained to shoot with the sights, and I have a lot invested in using them, between trips to shooting schools, and hundreds, maybe thousands of hours of practice. Because of this background, my knee-jerk reaction to point shooters is that they are crazy. of course, I've never received any point-shooting instruction, so I've kept my mouth shut.

A couple months ago, hso, a moderator on The High Road, asked me if I wanted to come to this point shooting class. Point shooting classes aren't the easiest thing to find, so I jumped on the opportunity.

The Techniques:

The first technique we learned was called Elbow Up Elbow Down (EUED). This a hip shooting technique, that uses body mechanics to get a steel on target asap. Basically, the gun is removed from the holster, and while maintained the arm's geometry, the elbow is slammed into the point of the hip. The contact with the hip is the signal to mash the trigger. At typical gunfight distances, this is a sure hit at belly button level. The challenge with this one isn't hitting the target, but performing the tech as fast and as aggressively as possible.

The next technique is The Zipper. The shooter begins with elbow up elbow down. After the first shot the arm is extended, while the shooter mashes the trigger, resulting in 4 shots or so being strung up the center line of the target.

Following The Zipper, we practiced The Hammer or the Bump. I am going to call it The Bump, because The Hammer is already used for another technique. With The Bump, the shooter begins with EUED. Then the hip is pushed forward a bit, and a second shot is fired. Bumping the hip forward causes the second shot to land at neck or head level.

After this we did this weird behind the back kind of thing where we curl up to the weak side, and shoot behind us. This was later combined with a spin out, where we transitioned from this curled up shooting position, to rolling out and stepping offline from the target.

The next technique is called Quick Kill Hip. Quick Kill is a point shooting system developed by the military sometime in the sixties or seventies. The difference here is that the elbow is placed in front of the hip rather than next to it. This technique is used to address multiple targets, something that EUED is not good at. EUED is faster, but QK Hip can address multiples.

After this we studied a technique called a sprint and hits. This is a technique Brownie invented. This technique we would draw, bring the gun to nipple level, turn out shoulders and run away at 45 degrees while hosing the target.

The last skill we worked on was the Quick Kill method with two hands. Basically the shooter focuses on the target. This means that the gun is only seen in peripheral vision. The shooter overlays the shadow of the gun on the correct location on the target. This position is learned by shooting a metric buttload of ammo.

The Critique:

EUED: Love it. It is now added to my practice regime.

The Bump: added. I don't find the head shot totally reliable but I'll work on hitting the neck region.

Zipper: Like it. I'm adding it. It flows from EUED, and will be devastating. 4 or 5 center line shots at 3 feet are nothing to sniff at. If anything I'm addressing the problem while getting the gun up to eye level.

QK Hip: I dunno. I need to play with it. The whole point of shooting from the hip is speed with which the gun is put into action. QK Hip is slower than the EUED. It does allow the shooter to engage multiples fairly quickly. We didn't cover moving. I don't care how fast I can shoot, if I have to deal with multiples I can't stand there. I have the idea down, so some time on the range while shooting and moving won't hurt.

Behind the Back and the spin out: Fun, but I'm not sure it was appropriate for this class.

Sprint and Hits: I like 'em, mainly because it's fun. I'm not sure how useful it is. I don't like the idea of moving quickly over terrain I can't see. I'd rather move laterally where I can see the ground in my peripheral vision. Moving exactly opposite from the direction you are looking in seems like a real good way to fall down. The range we were shooting on had a rough surface, and I was very worried about tripping and falling while doing these. In addition, knowing that criminals like to work in pairs, I would rather try to advance past #1, to get both bad guys on the same side of me, rather than stepping back towards #2, whom I haven't seen yet. The lateral aspect of this technique seemed to give most of the students a hard time. I would have liked to do this dry 10 or 20 times to get all the monkey-motion coordinated before shooting, perhaps with chalk lines drawn on the ground so people could see the where they were supposed to be vs. where they ended up. Even at the end of the class people were retreating straight back. A straight back retreat, against a gun wielding opponent gets you absolutely
nothing.

QK Two Hands: This seems to be almost exactly like modern isosceles technique, except the gun is lowered a few inches, and the shooter is looking over the gun. For this method, we started backing up going out as far as 40 feet. At 15 feet I could easily punch the center out of the target. While I was happy at this performance, I can do the same thing, at a similar speed using the sights. In some ways this is not a fair comparison, because I have thousands and thousands of rounds downrange using the sights.

Some of the students had a heap of trouble with this skill, to the point that they weren't hitting the paper much at all. Watching them showed that they had very poor trigger control. I asked Brownie how an instructor would fix trigger control issues with the point shooting mindset, considering that the traditional method was to have the student dry fire on a blank wall, without moving the sights. He sorta grinned. If you know Brownie, you know the grin I am talking about. He said that this was an advanced skill, and that you had to already be able to address the target to use it. Basically, once you can reliably hit a target using the sights, the sights are a crutch, and Brownie is kicking your crutches out from under you to prove that you can actually walk. Hmm, I said.

I'd also like to point out that Brownie has some very nice, fiber/tritium sights on his Glock.
 
peer review

Thank you for the objective critique, and your good insight also.

Though I do not recommend sighless shooting myself, I do think there are situations where "quick kill" or instinctive shooting is valid. Very few though.
 
Thanks for the review Owen. Good insight.

Point shooting discussions can be very, "lively". They can end up with people in divided camps when there's no need for such divisions. Point shooting has strengths at close ranges where speed is critical that compliment "modern" shooting and is simply another tool in the tool box to use when appropriate.
 
One of the reasons I switched to a 1911 is for ergonomics. This benifit is because of the ease in which point shooting occurs. Half the trouble of getting back on target after recoil is trying to get the sights on target. I know that my 1911 is on target when my thumbs and index finger are point at the target. While I'm still looking at my sights, this has helped follow up shots incredibly for me.
The EUED sounds like a good learning technique, and the zipper really sounds great! The other ones sound inappropriate, and downright dangerous. I guess it's all in the description though. Seeing it might be al ittle different.
 
Just to let everyone know, Owen is an exceptional shooter. (He ought to be considering he's had a gun in his hand since he was a wee lad.:evil:) He was easily the most accurate person on the line. This isn't usually the case with someone who is an excellent front sight/rear sight shooter since there's a lot of well established muscle memory to work through that's different from the PS technique. He was so good with 2-hand we taped his front sights just in case he was aquiring them out of habit. He still ate a big hole in the middle of the target. Over and over again.

I also value his opinion as someone who's taken a lot of firearms training and who has also provided technical training to others in machine operation so he has a good idea of how formal hands-on training can be conducted.
 
oobray, your issues are exactly why I took the class. Without learning the techniques, I felt I had no right to criticize them., so I took the class.

QK sounds very loosey-goosey, but it's not. There is quite a bit of technique to it, and that is something that ishard to understand for a sighted shooter, because so much attention is focused on the front sight. For sighted shooting, the front sight is the technique.

From reading and writing manuals, I know that the written word does a poor job of explaining technique. There is a degree of feel that the practitioner needs to feel before they understand what the writer was trying to say.

A perfect example is descriptions of trigger control. Until the shooter experiences "the perfect trigger pull," they think they know what they were doing. Then they have that epiphany, and realize how wrong they were all along.

I'm the guy you see doing weird stuff at the range. I'm the guy that waits for the rifle range to clear out, so he can put a target out at 200, stand at 150 and shoot a cylinder or two from a M27, and then starts backing up.

Brownie says he can reliably hit a silhouette at 200 yards with QK. I believe him, because I can reliably hit a silhouette at 200 hundred yards with the sights. I daresay the idea of hitting a target at 200 yards with a handgun is something the majority of shooters would think darn near impossible, mainly because they've never tried it, and secondly, because they refuse to practice enough to stop sucking. QK is sighted shooting, its just a sighting method that doesn't use the sights, but until you've tried it, you probably won't understand what I'm talking about.

Does it have the same precision potential as using the sights? Under 50 yards, maybe. When bullet-drop and wind start to become a major issue, I doubt it. But let me ask you this; as a civilian, how often will you be defending yourself from an attacker at fifty yards? How often at ten feet, and how often will you be hands on?

I daresay that for the majority of defensive problems, the best solution is going to be EUED.

Am I going to stop using the sights? Nope. I like my sights, but its comforting to know that I don't really need them.

So find a class, get thee to a range. Stop thinking, experiment.
 
After this we did this weird behind the back kind of thing where we curl up to the weak side, and shoot behind us. This was later combined with a spin out, where we transitioned from this curled up shooting position, to rolling out and stepping offline from the target.

Owen, can you give us a better description of this one? I'm having a hard time picturing it.

pax
 
pax,

You're correct, it is difficult to describe clearly. With luck there may be some video footage of it to post (picture = 1kword then vid = 1Mword). It is not a basic technique, but it does highlight that you can put rounds on target reliably at close (<10 ft) without the classic sight picture or the modern shooting stances of iso or weaver. I'm sure that the opportunity to carry it out on the street is very small since an attack from behind that you would respond with gunfire would be rare, but they do happen. A specialty tool, so to speak. I am certain that no one should try it without a trainer at first to walk them through it under supervision.
 
Last edited:
Owen,

Do you think you can make it back on Friday for the ITFS II or the Rifle on Sat?
 
oops, forgot to ask.

Can you change the title of this thread to the course name? I botched the typing
 
owen,
excellent and well written review.

Re: Behind the back.

Method I was shown when the earth was flat was:
Imagine holding a baby weak-side, weak arm under baby's bottom, baby's chest against yours, and head on your weak shoulder.

BG is standing near baby, slight angle to you, verbal threats, with weapon, maybe reaching for/ threatening baby...
Reach for "wallet", being in fear, produce firearm, and turn/spin and shoot from behind back.

This is what was taught to me and others so many years ago I mean I was in 3 rd grade when I was "big enough" for this lesson.

Concern was being confronted with a baby/child, and protecting baby/ child from gunfire best can.
Applicable to a sack of groceries, and gaining an edge, by doing the unexpected.
 
Training with Brownie – 'range' report and then some...

I spent Monday and Tuesday with Brownie getting trained in any number of self-defense methods - QK, EU/ED, movement, multiple threats, zippers, QK with a rifle, and HTH.

The training was great. Much of the training focuses on close encounters, not all of it but a good portion of it. That fit perfectly into my needs. I’ve had tons of training at some of the best known schools in the nation. They are excellent training, but most of their focus is from 9 feet (3 yards) and longer ranges. They do cover toe-to-toe but there’s not a lot of it, more accurately not enough of it. CQ is very important because most gunfights happen at close range, somewhere between 3 feet to 20 feet and some longer, but most in that range. So Brownie’s techniques that deal with up close fill a void that most schools don’t give quite enough attention to.

The overall strategy is simple – get the first hit and follow that by rapid fire hits and keep shooting until the threat is eliminated – and don’t get shot in the process. There’s an old saying that some famous guy said that goes something like, “Speed is fine, accuracy is final” or something like that. After this training, I’m not so sure that’s accurate (no pun intended). First let me define accuracy as it applies to this training. Accuracy is simply a hit on the torso – as fast as you can, followed by more hits. The principle here is that a BG cannot shoot accurately, if at all, if he’s being continuously be hit in the torso. Of course, COM hits are preferred, but torso hits should work it means you’re keeping the assailant in a defensive, reactive mode, and you are hurting him. And guys, 5 shots is borderline for one assailant. What we are trying to accomplish is to keep the BG from shooting us until incapacitation occurs.

One thing that bothers me immensely about SD shooting discussions is the failure to recognize and acknowledge that one shot will likely not incapacitate an attacker. One hit may cause him to react, but it not keep him from returning fire. After all, now he’s in the fight or flight mode. If he fights, he’ll likely start shooting if for nothing else to stop you from shooting him. It is pointless to swap shots with an attacker. You might as well turn and run – you’d get hit less. So I found the shoot first followed by rapid follow-up hits right down my alley. So not only will you see how, but why as well.

If you train with Brownie, get the HTH too. His HTH techniques are simple, fast, effective, and devastating. The HTH techniques end the confrontation fast. That gives you all kinds of options. If you’re facing two threats you can deal with one, and take on the second in any number of ways, with or without going to your gun. You can control and use one threat as a shield from the second threat. These are simple techniques that work and you can use without putting in years of training and practice. The powerful thing is that while the methods deal with empty hands, knifes, etc., they use essentially the same techniques so you’re not learning a different thing for every different scenarios.

Now, my disclaimer, not for the training, but for those of us that have practiced and do practice a solid shooting technique. I am very fortunate that I learned proper sighted shooting techniques from the start. As you practice, you just get better. But, with practice the techniques ingrain and are difficult to change. I train with my sights and at 9 feet and greater, I will use my sights. Up close, I now have the option of any number of techniques I learned from Brownie plus a few I’ve learned at other schools. Brownie’s methods work and they are fast for up close encounters. But, and I’m probably gonna start a war here, but I don’t believe properly done sighted fire is any slower than point shooting IF we’re talking about shooting from an extended position. Let me relate a little incident that happened Monday.

We had been training at 15 feet with QK, starting slow and gradually speeding up. I was doing fine with it. Then Brownie said, “OK, let’s try it full speed – FIRE!” I fired 18 shots about as fast as I could pull the trigger. I had no idea where the shots went. When I finished, Brownie said, “OK, Ron, try it this time without using the sights.” I hung my head because I knew what had just happened. When I went to full speed, trained instincts took over. I aligned the front sight as I extended, as soon as I was at extension, the shot broke – no sighting, the sighting was already done. I was firing I guess as fast as I could pull the trigger, following the sight through recoil and subconsciously shooting in rhythm as I had practiced so many times before. The guy standing beside me said, “Well, I wondered how you were getting such a tight group without using the sights.”

I said that to say this. If you’ve practiced one technique enough, it becomes instinctive. If you began with proper technique, it is fast and accurate and accuracy can be modified via speed and speed modified by sight picture alignment and dwell time.

So if you use your sight(s) instinctively via training and you use the right technique, it isn’t slow. But the up close stuff Brownie teaches is simply faster and I can prove it.

Thanks Brownie – great training.
 
Extremely comprehensive write-up. Thanks.


Tangle said: And guys, 5 shots is borderline for one assailant.

I'm curious about what this means. 5 shots being the minimum, or 5 shots being the most we should train ourselves to deliver?
 
It isn't 'safe' to assume anything about gunfighting. Just kiddin'. Most schools I've been to teach some form of 'retention' shooting - essentially shooting from a position where the gun is not visible, not even in the peripheral. That includes Gunsite and Thunder Ranch. Hmmm, Blackwater doesn't - hadn't thought about that before. But IMO the schools I've been to don't dwell on it enough. They also teach hip shooting and techniques to move away from the threat while shooting.

So, yes, shooting from the hip, e.g. EU/ED at close range has it's place. And the same is true for teaching it.

And the same is true for teaching tactics to minimize the chances of being caught in a toe-to-toe gunfight. Also true for HTH that allows one to effectively escape a toe-to-toe gunfight and end the fight or gain time and distance.
 
BullfrogKen,

What I meant was, is if five rounds is all you have in your gun when the fight starts, it's borderline. By all the training I've had, reports I've read, etc., I am convinced you will finish the gunfight one way or another with the rounds in your gun. That is, there simply will not be time or opportunity to reload in a gunfight.

An addition:
I didn't address all of the question. I think, my opinion based on my training, that we should not train ourselves to shoot any number of rounds as a minimum or maximum. We don't want to shoot more than necessary because that would really look bad in court. We don't want to stop shooting before the fight is over, that'd look really bad for our future. SD must be situation driven. Some will say there's no time to assess, but we must. Otherwise how do we determine when to stop shooting? All I was saying is don't go into a gunfight with only 5 rounds in your gun.
 
Okay, I'll ask...

Who or what is "Brownie"?

EU/ED, zippers, QK with a rifle?

Help bring me up to speed.

Thanks for contributing to my education.

John
 
Who or what is "Brownie"?

All you gotta do is search this forum for Brownie and you find his posts on Point Shooting (http://thehighroad.org/search.php?searchid=2382044).

He's one of the Point Shooting instructors (along with Matthew Temkin, 7677, Sweatnbullets) that posts here.

He trains at his place in AZ and at other locations. This week in East TN.

Point Shooting is a close quarters shooting system that doesn't use the front/rear sight approach for aiming. It's difficult to describe, but two very experienced non-PS shooters here have posted their experiences and see value in it.
 
Just got out of the shower after working with Brownie and a couple of his students in the ITFS II class all day. I'll be tending to my Airsoft welts for a few days.

The day consisted of movement and firing, moving and firing multitarget exercises, Airsoft on moving target, FoF with Airsoft and self-defense problem solving exercises (multitarget scenarios). It ended with excercises in H2H/retention/disarm.

I'll wait for one of the participants to give an AAR, but they seemed pretty happy (Or was that happy shooting at me with Airsoft?:uhoh:) with what they learned.
 
hso said: Just got out of the shower after working with Brownie and a couple of his students . . . I'll wait for one of the participants to give an AAR, but they seemed pretty happy (Or was that happy shooting at me with Airsoft? :uhoh: ) with what they learned.


Mike, you sure that shooting you was what made them happy, and not the shower afterwards?

;)


Thanks for clearing it up, Tangle. Good review fellas.
 
EU/ED is a method that was taught to a few of us by Dave James, who is a member/poster here.
Dave learned it from Col. Askins but was also taught similar concepts by Jelly Bryce and Bill Jordan.
In both range and FOF I have found it to be an excellent method to use against close range multiples and is as fast as greased lightening.
Dave James also recommends going from EU/ED into 3/4 hip ASAP ( 3/4 hip is where the elbow is well bent and the gun is held at sternum level) which sort of becomes a zipper/vertical tracking method of shooting.
I too feel that the QK hip method is a bit slower than EU/ED and brings the gun out a bit far from the body for my liking.
Hopefully DJ will come in on this and provide some more info on the methods taught to him by some very interesting hombres.
 
Matt, you are indeed lucky to have been taught by DJ. I wasn't aware he did that type of thing. One move I like from EU/ED is to transition into sprint and hits. I think this is the best technique against multiple attackers. It allows for accurate fire while getting the hell out of dodge. Take care.

Jim
 
there are a few point shooting drills in my regime, and they work good for me and others that i have taught, they are probally not necessay 99% of the time, but just like anything else it is better to train for it and not use it than not train for it and it be needed, i like it and i see many situations thatpoint shooting would help a handgunner come ot on top. it's all about trainning.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top