leadcounsel
member
Easiest question - CZ75
hands down
I've had both and the CZ is better - smaller, lighter, better capacity, better ergonomics, much more accurate and reliable. You'll get a significantly better and more accurate and reliable handgun in a smaller more ergonomic package with (I believe) 2 additional shot capacity standard.
The 92fs was my first pistol. Inaccurate and unreliable. Junk IMO. I've carried it in Iraq. Too big, clunky and heavy for the capacity and caliber. Sure the 92 will have some more holster choices, but that's certainly no reason to buy a gun.
hands down
I've had both and the CZ is better - smaller, lighter, better capacity, better ergonomics, much more accurate and reliable. You'll get a significantly better and more accurate and reliable handgun in a smaller more ergonomic package with (I believe) 2 additional shot capacity standard.
The 92fs was my first pistol. Inaccurate and unreliable. Junk IMO. I've carried it in Iraq. Too big, clunky and heavy for the capacity and caliber. Sure the 92 will have some more holster choices, but that's certainly no reason to buy a gun.