Just to get the blood pressure up a wee bit...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Shadowwolf80

Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2006
Messages
12
This got my BP up, figured I would spread the love.

http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_9662672

My 20-month-old nephew loves Elmo and Dora. He also has started making explosion and gunfire noises.
I get the inevitability of little boys' fascination with guns.
What I can't figure out are the men and sometimes women who don't grow out of the gun-crazy stage of childhood, who need to have a handgun on their hips at all times, who need their neighbors to notice.
Ten of them stormed the West Valley City Council meeting last week to back up Travis Deveraux, a 36-year-old credit card company worker, who was detained by police in December while exercising with his Smith & Wesson.
"I don't blame them for being a little bit extra careful," Deveraux said. "But there's a line they crossed between being a little bit careful and a little bit too careful."
I thought there was no such thing as "too careful" - especially with a gun. But the OpenCarry crowd's literal interpretation of the "right to bear arms" and self-appointment as our "well-regulated militia" undercuts careful law enforcement, membership in a civil society and even reason.
It's in the Constitution, their thinking goes. They are "peaceably going about their business while armed," standing on the watchtower, the last line of defense against government tyranny and crazed criminals. We should thank them.
I understand the thrill of firing a Glock
Advertisement

(I've done it), the euphoria of hitting the center of a target (and that, too), generations of family deer-hunting weekends and the legitimate self-preservation instincts of Utah's elected concealed weapon carriers.
But the OpenCarry movement is a mystery to me. What kind of psychology - overcompensation, paranoia, antisocial personality - is behind that thinking?
Steven Gunn, an attorney and board member of the Gun Violence Prevention Center of Utah, believes it's pure ego.
"We have inconsiderate boors walking around on the street carrying firearms openly," says Gunn. "I don't think they are truly afraid for their safety. Most of them are trying to make a statement about the Second Amendment."
Anthropologist Charles Springwood says open carriers are trying to "naturalize the presence of guns, which means that guns become ordinary, omnipresent and expected. Over time, the gun becomes a symbol of ordinary personhood."
OpenCarry.org, run by two Virginia gun lovers, claims 4,000 members nationwide. According to the Legal Community Against Violence in San Francisco, just seven states prohibit packing in public and eight restrict carrying handguns openly without a permit.
Utah's OpenCarry activists put on a show for the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago, trying to appear warm and fuzzy, shopping at Costco, just like you and me - but with their handguns flapping in the breeze. They meet once a month at restaurants like Denny's and Sweet Tomatoes to socialize.
"We don't want to show up and say, 'Hey, we're here, we're armed, get used to it,' " Kevin Jensen told the Times reporter.
But that's just what the showdown in West Valley City was about. The cowed mayor and City Council members referred the case to the officers' professional standards review board.
Police are struggling to strike a balance between gun owners' rights and those of the rest of us.
"There has to be some common sense on their part, too; they have to take into consideration the concern that they cause other citizens," says Layton Police Chief Terry Keefe. "I do not walk around when I'm off-duty with a weapon displayed."
Salt Lake City Police Chief Chris Burbank would rather gun owners get concealed weapon permits than carry openly.
"In light of Trolley Square, mall shootings, school shootings, anyone walking around with a gun potentially creates a lot of phone calls for us," Burbank says. "How do you expect an officer to deal with that - other than to point a gun at them and go through the process [of elimination]? There's no other way to make that determination safely without putting officers at risk."
Utah lawmakers set up this stalemate when they wrote the state's anything-goes concealed weapon law. They deliberately left open a loophole for those who carry their guns out in the open. Under Utah law, open carriers must be 18 years old and keep their bullets out of the chamber. That's it. No training, no background check required.
"Second Amendment questions aside," says Springwood, a professor at Illinois Wesleyan University, "the real debate seems to me a cultural and social one: Do we want a society in which it is an unconscious emblem of everyday life that folks move about with 'portable killing machines' strapped to their bodies?"
Legislators already have made that decision for us; we're living in the modern heart of the wild, wild West.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I guess the stuff you guys say about SLC is true....
And I am hardly about to stop strapping my culturally mandated 'portable killing device.' I guess it illustrates how different we are from some of these folks(as though we lacks examples); I always thought of it more of a portable device to assist in preventing me from being killed...:cuss:

I have never open carried about my daily life (nor would it fly here in Filthydelphia), but I like to think that doing so would not make me an egomaniac. I need to send this woman an email, but I think I may need some kind of anti-vitriol medication first.
 
Last edited:
FIRE MISSION - "Was this article worthwhile"

FIRE MISSION - "Was this article worthwhile"

Click the thumbs-down icon at the bottom of the article.

We are losing so far.

http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_9662672

"Time to grow up and put your guns away
By Rebecca Walsh
Tribune Columnist
Article Last Updated: 06/22/2008 12:34:35 AM MDT

My 20-month-old nephew loves Elmo and Dora. He also has started making explosion and gunfire noises.

I get the inevitability of little boys' fascination with guns.
What I can't figure out are the men and sometimes women who don't grow out of the gun-crazy stage of childhood, who need to have a handgun on their hips at all times, who need their neighbors to notice.

Ten of them stormed the West Valley City Council meeting last week..."
 
There it is...the wild, wild west!

If the folks who are OC'ing in Utah were going around shooting up things, it might be the wild, wild west. But by excercising their 2A protected right, they are somehow egomaniacal killers looking for something to shoot. I'll bet this person has never spoken to anyone who carries a gun about why they carry a gun, instead basing her info on the "Gun Violence Policy Center" diatribe and some anthropologist who thinks he knows why people carry guns.

Give me a break. :barf:
 
As of 5:29PM the "Was the article worthwhile" is at -8 with 82 votes.

I gave it a thumbs down although I agreed with Charles Springwood that open carriers are trying to "naturalize the presence of guns, which means that guns become ordinary, omnipresent, and expected."
 
I guess the fact that I want to live to be old and gray while protecting people close to me makes me an "egomaniac". I guess having a fire extinguisher in my house and regular doctor checkups would also make me an "egomaniac" in the eyes of this dumb *****.
 
Our children are raised only seeing guns with bad people; video games, tv and movies and the news. The only good guys they see O.C.ing are police. I O.C. and only for the attention that people see a normal guy carrying, and eventually, if enough people do it, then the good guys will earn back the persona of the "gun culture," which for decades was reserved for the bad guys.
 
Heck, I remember some lady complaining about two kids I knew walking to a pick-up softball game with cracked baseball bat and an axe handle type stick. It doesn't matter what you are carrying, some fuddyduddy will complain.
 
I hope people here are able to see the otherside of this debate. Open carry can be distressing to many innocent civilians, cause cetain fragile personas to panic, and be a general pain to law enforcement because of this. I think that those people who use good judgement about when and where to conceal and when and where to open carry are doing their part to keep us "good guys" on the upside of the public relations game. Let's face it, PR is important if we are trying to keep our rights and bring the general population to our side.

Those of you who want to be stubborn and say, "to heck with the rest of you, I don't care if i freak out a mother with her children at the mall," I think your ego is quite definitely involved. I am sure I will be flamed for saying this, but I don't think open carry is a responsible choice at all times. Just because you have the right to do so, does not mean it is the right thing to do.

PS
I in no way agree with how this reporter (more of an opinion columnist) is writing that the open carry crowd is just full of overcompensating, paranoid people. I find her annoying. I do agree with the police chief she quoted though. In the sort of area I live, urban (Seattle), concealed carry is a better choice. If i am out on the road, in sparsely populated areas, desolated rest stops, etc,etc, I think that is when I would find open carry more suitable.
 
My problem is with what he calls a civil society. With the SCOTUS saying police have no duty to protect the individual citizen, with gangs prowling the streets of every major city from New York to Los Angeles from Miami to Seattle, with all the drug dealers dealing to anyone with $5 in their pockets, with the crime rate as high as it is, where does he get the idea this is a civil society? He seeks the proliferation of these wolves while seeking the demise of the sheepdogs. Is this sensible, is this how a civil society survives and thrives? I think not. I think a civil society seeks to increase and strengthen the sheepdogs while attempting to destroy the wolves.
 
Was the article worthwhile? Sure, it's an exercise in free speech, right? But aside from that, it's a reminder of what their position is, and a challenge on how we can figure out a way to counter it.

Of course that's not what my vote would've reflected had I chosen to vote.
 
Was the article worthwhile? Sure, it's an exercise in free speech, right?
The rights to freedom of the press and to freedom of speech doesn't meant that what any fool choses to say or write is automatically worth reading or hearing.
 
But the OpenCarry movement is a mystery to me. What kind of psychology - overcompensation, paranoia, antisocial personality - is behind that thinking?
Steven Gunn, an attorney and board member of the Gun Violence Prevention Center of Utah, believes it's pure ego.
"We have inconsiderate boors walking around on the street carrying firearms openly," says Gunn. "I don't think they are truly afraid for their safety. Most of them are trying to make a statement about the Second Amendment."

Those commoners are hurting my feewings! Make them stop!
 
I hope people here are able to see the otherside of this debate. Open carry can be distressing to many innocent civilians, cause cetain fragile personas to panic, and be a general pain to law enforcement because of this. I think that those people who use good judgement about when and where to conceal and when and where to open carry are doing their part to keep us "good guys" on the upside of the public relations game. Let's face it, PR is important if we are trying to keep our rights and bring the general population to our side.

This is what I was trying to counter. A generation of anti-gun media and movies have taught that armed defense is for the back-country white supremacists and gangbangers. We judge people by color, sex and even guns. Woman stood up for the right to vote, they to were a hindrance to a certain population. I am proud of those who stood in the open for civil rights, again this made the whole country uncomfortable. Most of us realize that all men are created equal.

As far as a scared mom goes, she is not scared of the armed police officer checking out at the grocery store. If she is nervous of a man carrying who isn't uniformed, that is only because she is not used to it. Again, only bad guys carry (sarcasm). My wife was uncomfortable with guns in her presence, now she has a sp101 and is taking her CCW class in July.

It is all about perception, and it is time we frame the terms of the debate.
 
Anthropologist Charles Springwood says open carriers are trying to "naturalize the presence of guns, which means that guns become ordinary, omnipresent and expected. Over time, the gun becomes a symbol of ordinary personhood."

This is the funny part of the article. I'm trying to figure out what would be WRONG with exactly this very thing happening, where guns are not really noticed any more.

That's a problem?
 
+1 mewachee

My wife took a little convincing for us to become gun owners. Now she doesn't bat an eye when I open carry out to dinner or plop my CCW on the table after coming home from work. Didn't take long at all.

I really believe the same can be true for the general public. It's true our culture has drifted away from being used to seeing guns and being comfortable with them -- but who's to say we can't drift back with a little work by responsible gun owners?

Besides, anyone who's ever open carried could tell you it does NOT, in fact, incite mass panic. Claiming otherwise is a nice anti strawman, but it's just not reality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top