Yeah, I DO trust my PF-9 more then my CZ-40p. I can count on one hand the number of malfunctions of any type that I have had with my PF-9.
My CZ-40p would constantly have failure to feeds with all types of ball ammo up untill the 400-500 round mark. We're talking AT LEAST one per magazine if not more. When I first got it, you could have sworn I was running a bolt action pistol, as it had a stoppage every 2nd or 3rd round, where the slide would NOT chamber a new round and it had to be tapped on the back to go back into battery. I was NOT impressed, especially considering the reputation that CZ had. After some 'internets' (see: CZ forums) searching, the opinion was "well, they always need a break in period."
Bear in mind this was also after a trip back to Mothership CZ to make it right. They did make it jam only once every 2-3 mags, down from once every 2-3 shots, but I was still not very impressed.
Sure the CZ is reliable now, but how come my cheap-O POS PF-9 ran 100% out of the box, while my expensive CZ needed a "break-in period"?