ljnowell
Member
I'm sure Kimber owns a ruler but it doesn't look like a full 2" to me.
Revolver barrels are measured to the face of the forcing cone. Basically from the front of the cylinder forward
I'm sure Kimber owns a ruler but it doesn't look like a full 2" to me.
@ljnowell....yea, I know. It just 'looks' short. Probably a stupid thing for me to say though.
Revolver barrels are measured to the face of the forcing cone. Basically from the front of the cylinder forward
Is there a particular reason for this? Unlike a semi auto, it seems like an inch or more of barrel length is being sacrificed, for what?
Revolver barrels are measured to the face of the forcing cone. Basically from the front of the cylinder forward
Excellent, Denis !In both gun types, you just measure the entire tube, front to rear.
Simple.
Some questions are unanswerable & the answer's irrelevant, even if you get one.
Denis
What if the Kimber turns out to be better than a Smith and Wesson in terms of fit, finish, trigger pull, and quality control ?
Then it will sell more guns of similar size and weight than Smith, and Smith will need to revamp SOME of their J frames.What if the Kimber turns out to be better than a Smith and Wesson in terms of fit, finish, trigger pull, and quality control ?
What if the Kimber turns out to be better than a Smith and Wesson in terms of fit, finish, trigger pull, and quality control ?
Until somebody buys one or two there's nothing to do but talk about it. It passes the time when I'm not shoveling snow or chipping ice.
At one point I used the big mattock to bust up the knee-high pile of solid sleet and snow blocking the garage door. It would have been more fun to use slugs or buckshot.