Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Leupold VXII VS Nikon Buckmasters

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by BOW CEFUS, Sep 18, 2007.

?

Leupold VX-II VS Nikon Buckmasters

  1. Leupold VX-II 3-9X40

    60.7%
  2. Nikon Buckmasters 3-9X40

    39.3%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BOW CEFUS

    BOW CEFUS member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2006
    Messages:
    46
    I need a hunting scope for 300 yards on me Remington 700 SPS in 308. Reviews would be great.
     
  2. Don't Tread On Me

    Don't Tread On Me Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,213
    Location:
    FLORIDA
    Nikon better glass. Leupold better warranty service. For a real hunting rifle that will go into the field, get banged around, and also considering that neither is exactly a high-end scope when it comes to optics (making glass a little more moot when weighing the options) ....I'd go Leupold.
     
  3. 1911

    1911 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    134
  4. grizz

    grizz Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2005
    Messages:
    412
    Location:
    Eagle River, AK
    They're both pretty good scopes, but I can't see how the Leupold is worth $100 more. I compared both scopes every time I was in the market and I now have 3 Nikon Buckmasters (2 3-9x and 1 4.5-14x).
     
  5. eliphalet

    eliphalet Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,682
    Location:
    Idaho
    Were using Leupold's made from as far back as the early to mid 60's. How good of a scope do you want or what's your dollar worth in the long run. if one did break it is only shipping to Oregon for a returned in "as new" condition scope, no receipt needed. Nikon is a good scope but I own Leupold's
     
  6. Don't Tread On Me

    Don't Tread On Me Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,213
    Location:
    FLORIDA
    Depends. Across the entire Leupold line, they are dollar for dollar INFERIOR optically to other brands. Why? Because they charge extra for their superior warranty service. They are building replacement into the cost of a scope. That VX-II costs $100 more, well Leupold's cost for building that scope is less to also make room for service/shipping when a warranty claim is made.

    There's nothing special about the glass, internals or body of a Leupold to justify the premium paid for them vs. other brands. It's all about the lifetime transferable, no questions asked warranty. Smart business if you ask me. Consumers love to have product confidence and Leupold gives them that. It's safe to say most scopes don't come back for service, so they make out well. On the other hand, you can be the 4th owner of a scope and still have 100% warranty support as if you were the original owner, even 20 years later. That can't be offered for free.
     
  7. Regolith

    Regolith Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,365
    Location:
    Nevada & Oregon
    Between those two companies...I'd say go for the cheaper one. They're both first-rate optics manufacturers, so you're going to get a good scope regardless.
     
  8. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,556
    Location:
    Norra Texas
    DTOM speaks the truth, but there's one more datapoint to add. The Leupold scope body is thicker and the finish anodizing much more robust than the Nikon. These differences don't make the view thru the scope any better, but they do make the scope much more likely to survive field use. They certainly make the scope look much better when/if it comes time to sell it.

    I've had Nikon bodies dent under impacts that the Leupold just shrugged off. For hunting use, that's worth something to me.
     
  9. trainwreck100

    trainwreck100 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    175
    I voted Nikon, simply because of reticle choices. Leupold really doesn't offer a whole lot in the VX-II line. Other than that, I have absolutely nothing bad to say about the Leupold sitting on top of my Remington 700.
     
  10. Mr White

    Mr White Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Messages:
    2,207
    Location:
    Central PA
    I have a Buckmaster 4-14. Its a great scope and I love it.
    When I bought it, it was comparable in price to a 3-9 VX-I. The Buckmaster seemed like a nicer scope than the VX-1 and the extra magnification fit in with its intended dual use on my .243 as a varmit and deer scope.

    Comparing apples to apples, I'd take a 3-9 VX-II over a 3-9 Buckmaster anyday.
     
  11. MechAg94

    MechAg94 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Messages:
    4,734
    Leupold's are also good sellers if you resell the rifle and/or scope.

    I bought a Remington 7400 at a pawn shop for the sole purpose of selling the rifle and keeping the Leupold scope on it. I thought I came out pretty good on the deal.

    On the other hand, Nikon is much easier to spell. I keep typing Leopold without thinking. :)
     
  12. Eyesac

    Eyesac Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,393
    Location:
    Reno, NV
    I played this game about a month ago, my choices included a Burris (which is what I went w/), if it wasn't Burris, I was prepared to go with the Nikkon. I just went down to the gun shop and looked through all of them. I feel like the Nikkon was brighter than the Leupold, but indoor light is tricky...
     
  13. slm9s

    slm9s Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2007
    Messages:
    4
    Recent Leupold warranty experience

    My folks believed just what everyone on here says: that leupold will take 40 year old scope and fix it for free - no questions asked, lifetime no-fault warranty.

    Well my Dad was elk hunting last year in the rainy northwest, slipped on a log and his Vari-X II 3-9 hit the log and the rear bell was bent at the threads. I told him no problem, send it in, you'll get it back no charge, good as new. Well, he sent it in, but they charged him $100 to fix it.

    Just FYI, leupold's warranty isn't a lifetime no-fault warranty like some would have you believe.
     
  14. Werewolf

    Werewolf Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2003
    Messages:
    4,192
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Nikon has a well deserved reputation for manufacturing fine optics whether it is camera lenses, rifle scopes, spotting scopes etc.

    I own and have used Nikon cameras and lenses for the past 30 years. I own and use a Nikon rifle scope and a spotting scope and have for the past 3 years. I do not own a Leupold product.

    Both my Rifle scope and spotting scope have been banged around enough that I believe they are built to the same standards of durability as their camera equipment (which is mucho, mucho rugged - I can attest to that from experience). It seems doubtful that Leupold could build anything more rugged than Nikon and since their optics probably are no better and maybe not as good based on comments from other posters it would seem that the Nikon should be your choice.
     
  15. eliphalet

    eliphalet Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,682
    Location:
    Idaho
    Peerhaps in the way it was damaged, abuse maybe? Still $100 for a new VariX-II 3x9 is a bargain.




    I have sent in two Older Leupold VariX-II's in the last couple of years. A 2X7 and a 3X9 both were old enough to only have a five digit serial number (60's). Both were completely disassembled and returned in "as new" condition. The 2X7 had been damaged before I ever owned it so no idea how or what had happened to it before I mounted it on a older mini 14 and beat it up some more. The 3X9 was OK after a check but again before I owned it somehow the objective lens had been scratched. When it came home the lens had been replaced free and unasked for. I cannot speak for others as this is my only personal experience with the company. Which was all one could ask for IMO.

    I did have some Nikon Binoculars go bad, not warranted forever I threw them away and now have Leupold bino's I hunt with. For the money the cost the Nikon's were a good product till they broke, began seeing double. I used them several years in not always so good of conditions. Our digi camera is Nikon and is a quality product.
     
  16. GunNut

    GunNut Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,075
    Location:
    Washington State
    I personally see very little difference between Nikon, Leupold and Burris in their respective price ranges.
     
  17. Crow

    Crow Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2007
    Messages:
    10
    Quality of glass and coatings is probably better on the Nikon. Leupolds biggest advantage IMO is the eye relief. If you don't need the extra eye relief, I think you will be happier with the image quality with the Nikon.
     
  18. MAX100

    MAX100 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,133
    Location:
    SC- at the GUN-CONNECTION
    The over price Leupold VXI and VXII scopes have a two piece tube. They fail to tell anyone about that in their ads. I would go with the better priced, more for your money Nikon.


    GC
     
  19. ArmedBear

    ArmedBear Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,171
    Burris Fullfield II Ballistic Plex.

    At least I'm happy with mine (3-9x40mm on a .30-06 Weatherby Vanguard, very similar to a 700), and so are others on the Board. $200 or so will buy a very nice, very durable scope with a drop reticle quite suitable and easy to use for hunting.

    I don't know about the Nikons. Leupolds are good scopes, and I've shot a higher-end varmint version of the combo you're talking about. The Leupie works great; the gun shoots tiny groups. They may be some more bucks for the bang, however.
     
  20. kennedy

    kennedy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2004
    Messages:
    832
    Location:
    southern Ind.
    check out the used glass market, just picked up a used var-II 3x9 for $189, looks and works perfect.
     
  21. Charles S

    Charles S Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,026
    Location:
    North East Texas
    Honestly, I have yet to look through the Nikon Buckmaster, but I am sure it is clear durable glass.

    I do however own two Leupold VXIIs that I am very happy with. I have a Nikon Monarch that is much more clear than the VXII and IMHO rivals my Vari X III. I have yet to break a Leupold or a Nikon so I have no experience with either companies customer service.

    The real difference to me (for some applications) is eye relief. In a hard kicking rifle longer eye relief is better, and the VX II has longer eye relief than does the Nikon Monarch.

    As a matter of fact the single reason I did not choose the Burris Fullfield was eye relief.

    I have a Sightron SII that is very clear, but does not have enough eye relief when the power is high for the rifle it is on.

    For me a long eye relief is critical for a hunting rifle, but then again I typically choose moderate calibers in very light rifles.
     
  22. SShooterZ

    SShooterZ Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    278
    Location:
    McHenry, IL
    Of the two, I'd probably pick the Leupold. They are good quality and the warranty can't be beat, especially when going on a hunting rifle that might get banged around.

    For overall brightness and clarity, you would be hard pressed to beat a Weaver Grand Slam or a Nikon Monarch.
     
  23. anymanusa

    anymanusa Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2007
    Messages:
    342
    Location:
    Beautiful South
    Nikon all the way. All of you talking about the warranty being better with Leupold, I can't imagine thats true. Nikon offers LIFETIME warranty on their scopes, better glass, and I've heard nothing but how good Nikons warranty service is on their cameras and lenses over on the photography forum.

    Nikon is a better value for the money.
     
  24. MechAg94

    MechAg94 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Messages:
    4,734
    Do Nikons and others hold their zero well? I would assume they do.
    That is one other important point for scopes that is critical if it fails.
     
  25. Gustav

    Gustav Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    554
    Leupold gets my vote for a few reasons first of all I have always been very satisfied with their products and in the few times repairs have been needed they have always come through without any questions or problems.

    In all the years of use and abuse my Leupolds have not failed and only when I messed up did a scope need to be fixed.
    They have been and will be around for decades to come.

    For cameras I buy Japanese but for rifle scopes I choose Leupold Kahles Zeiss or IOR.;)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page