Long trigger pull....

[WifeofBleys]

Since I can't seem to point to one specific .22lr that I like and that also fits our price range, I have decided to concentrate on learning to shoot the Hi-Point C9 that we have. However, I have one problem...I shot two rounds through it the other day (hubby shot 46 rds.) and found that it has an incredibly long trigger pull. Any suggestions on how to deal with this? Thanks!

 

[Thompsoncustom]

I would recommend this

http://www.hipointfirearmsforums.com/Forum/index.php/topic,33209.0.html

if this does fix your problem as it doesn't really fix the lengh of the pull it will make the trigger a lot better then it was stock.

 

[iareConfusE]

Which .22's have you tried out, and what is your price range? There has to be at least one .22 pistol out there that you will enjoy learning on...

 

[hexidismal]

You didn't mention specifically if the HiPoint C9 was the only pistol you have, but if it is I would very highly discourage doing any trigger work to it. Strange for me to say as I do a lot of trigger work myself, but it's important to note that there are inherent risks and you most certainly do not want to risk making a primary defensive pistol unreliable.

 

[Onward Allusion]

WifeofBleys

Long trigger pull....
Since I can't seem to point to one specific .22lr that I like and that also fits our price range, I have decided to concentrate on learning to shoot the Hi-Point C9 that we have. However, I have one problem...I shot two rounds through it the other day (hubby shot 46 rds.) and found that it has an incredibly long trigger pull. Any suggestions on how to deal with this? Thanks!

You have to realize that the Hi-Point is a very basic inexpensive no-frills weapon. It is really not a range pistol. Yes, absolutely practice with it, but I think you were on the right path with the thinking of a .22LR as a range gun. Besides, it's a lot cheaper to shoot.

What is your price range? I'm sure the folks here can make a few recommendations.

 

[Onward Allusion]

http://www.thehighroad.org/member.php?u=34659

hexidismal

You didn't mention specifically if the HiPoint C9 was the only pistol you have, but if it is I would very highly discourage doing any trigger work to it. Strange for me to say as I do a lot of trigger work myself, but it's important to note that there are inherent risks and you most certainly do not want to risk making a primary defensive pistol unreliable.

Yes, absolutely don't mess with the HP's functionality. It is just not that kind of gun.

 

[ET]

My wife won't shoot my Hi-Point C9. It is just too uncomfortable for her. My C9 is 12 years old and is heavier than today's c9 guns & it kicks more than a 9mm should. She only shoots the Buckmark Camper(22LR). It does every thing she wants a gun to do, mainly not kick when it's fired. She will shoot 200-300 rounds every time we go to the range. She has never complained about her hand hurting or getting beat up (something she would always do when shooting anything other than the Camper). Just a thought.

 

[WifeofBleys]

I would like to preface this post by saying that I am 36 years old and have shot 56 rounds in my lifetime. That estimate may be a bit high.

My husband and I have 3 firearms. His Walther P99, my .22 magnum Taurus 941, and the most recently purchased Hi-Point C9.

The first time I ever fired a weapon, it was my husband’s P99. Not such a good idea, but it was the only firearm we had at the time. It was much too much for me to handle. I fired 4 rounds with it and handed it back to hubby with the admonition that I would never fire it again. Heck, I couldn’t even pull the slide back!

A few months later, we were at a local gun shop and he found the .22 magnum Taurus 941. I was happy about it, but still not too keen on shooting after my experience with the P99. In December 2010, we purchased the Hi-Point C9. (I still hadn’t been able to shoot the .22 by this point.)

A few weeks ago, we were finally able to go out shooting. I shot quite a few rounds through the .22 and loved it! I also shot 2 rounds on the C9, just to see how I handled it. Besides the long trigger, I liked it and it didn’t beat me up like I feared it would. I would love to get a .22lr just for practice as it would be much more affordable to shoot. That being said, I also want to get more familiar with the C9 and make it my primary home defense weapon…in case Grandma and I are home alone without Bleys and his Walther.

I really don’t want to alter any of the trigger mechanism on the C9. Are there any other options?

As an aside, price range for a .22lr would be nothing over $175.

Thanks!

 

[FIVETWOSEVEN]

Well if you would'nt mind a Single action revolver then check out Heritage Arms.
http://www.heritagemfg.com/site/department.cfm?id=50

 

[WifeofBleys]

I have looked at Heritage Arms...while their prices are what we are looking for, I'm not sure I would like the pain it would be to load and reload. I like that about my magnum: it is quick to load and unload.

 

[hexidismal]

In the price range you specify, that's a tough one, though FIVETWOSEVEN's suggestion of the Heritage revolver is a good call. Shooting a single action revolver is something you really have to have a taste for though. Personally, while I highly enjoy more common revolvers, I have just never found any love for the single action platform. To be fair though, the SA revolvers I have owned were chambered in .44 magnum and the SA platform is not particularly conducive to recoil management. That could very well have a lot to do with my opinion of it.

The NAA mini revolvers are another platform for .22lr that can be had in that price range, but these are by no means target/range guns. Generally achieving minute of pie plate accuracy at any reasonable target distances, in even the hands of experienced shooters.. these are basically really cool toys, but probably wouldn't suit your needs as a learning shooter.

My best suggestion, particularly if you want the practice and ease of use from a semi-auto, would be to save up a little more for a gun like the Beretta Neos or the S&W 22a. Both are high quality guns which can be acquired for between $230-$250. Perhaps less if you keep your eye out for a used one. In my opinion, they are the best compromises between price and quality for the price conscious shooter (of which I am one myself).

 

[Onward Allusion]

WifeofBleys
<SNIP>
A few weeks ago, we were finally able to go out shooting. I shot quite a few rounds through the .22 and loved it! I also shot 2 rounds on the C9, just to see how I handled it. Besides the long trigger, I liked it and it didn’t beat me up like I feared it would. I would love to get a .22lr just for practice as it would be much more affordable to shoot.<SNIP>
As an aside, price range for a .22lr would be nothing over $175.

Thanks!

For that price range you will be hard pressed to get a S&W, Ruger, or even Taurus revolver in 22LR. You may want to look at the older H&R revolvers. There are plenty of them around and the ones chambered in 22LR generally last almost forever.

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=212213591
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=212727007

RE: the 922, it's a fixed cylinder not a swing out. You reload by pulling the cylinder pin and the cases are all ejected by pushing the center of the cylinder. Much faster than Heritage single action. The 922's can be had all over for around $100 to $150 depending on condition.

 

[WifeofBleys]

I have been looking online and found:

Heritage Arms .22lr with 4 3/4 or 6 1/2 barrel for $157.00.
S&W .22a for $234.00.
Beretta U22 Neos 4 1/2 barrel for $238.00,
or the 6" barrel stainless version of the U22 for $286.00, or even better the 6" barrel black version for $230! All of these prices are tax and shipping included.

I really like the look of the S&W .22a or the U22 stainless 6" barrel. Prices aren't too bad. I've read some good things about the U22 on THR (and hopefully by now the recall issue has been fixed). And I personally think it is a cool looking gun!

Can anyone provide pros or cons on these particular firearms to finally help me make up my mind? Bleys has the final say, but he and I like to do as much research as possible before making a purchase.

Thanks!

 

[hexidismal]

Between the two of them, having some experience with both (own the Neos, have fired the S&W) I personally prefer the U22 Neos. The grip angle looks weird, but I've found that just about everyone who's held mine has mentioned how the liked the feel. I think it's the slightly better built gun, incredibly simple to field strip and clean.. and as it turned out I literally wrote the book on how excellent the trigger can be made with very little work or additional cost.

As usual though, the best thing to do is to try and find them in a local shop and see how they feel in your hand. I can't say for where you live obviously, but they are both common guns in my area and generally easily found in the chain stores.

Lastly, price being a major conscern, keep in mind that if you order from an online source you'll have to pay a transfer fee at whatever local FFL you have it shipped to. Prices on transfers vary greatly by shop. However, location depending, you would likely not incur sales tax by ordering online.. so it's a trade off.

 

[WifeofBleys]

Since I have been researching opinions here, I am now leaning toward the S&W 22a...if only because I have seen several posts about the rear site on the Neos loosening up and even coming off. I founnd one for $234.00, tax and shipping included.

 

[sarduy]

look for a Phoenix HP22 the they are cheap as they come, and very reliabale.

 

[WifeofBleys]

Phoenix HP22....cheap as in cheaply made or just the fact that they are affordable to buy?