Lying about Groups

Do you exaggerate the size of your groups?

  • Of course I do, doesn't everyone?

    Votes: 9 4.4%
  • No way. Never did, never will.

    Votes: 175 85.4%
  • I'm lying about not lying about my groups!!

    Votes: 21 10.2%

  • Total voters
    205
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Me and the wife only own two weapons that I believe are less accurate than I am: a Walther P22 and a 22LR M4ergy. Even the Wolf 5.56 that some complain about is more accurate than I am.
 
If I am shooting off sand bags I'm not testing myself, just the gun. If it is a good group, I give the gun credit. If I am holding the gun with no rest then all bets are off.:D No I don't stretch the truth...much.
 
Last edited:
hey, hey now
I shot a one ragged hole 6 shot <1" group standing off hand w/ 357 revolver, 15 yards, no sandbags, really, no kidding...

ONCE
(in my entire life)

it was... 27 years ago, uhhh, mebbe 30 years ago,,, uhhh, something like that

but seriously now, I much prefer shooting dirt to shooting paper
shooting dirt, I hardly ever miss (well every once in a while, but cheap ammo these days, you gotta' expect a flyer every now and then) :D
 
No reason to lie about anything. I feel no overwhelming need to attempt impressing anyone here. That doesn't matter at all to me.
Popeye said it best, "I yam what I yam."
 
All I will say is the average guy next to me at the range is no where near as good a shot as the average net poster.
 
I think a lot depends on your perspective. I suspect a lot (if not most here) are more used to shooting a 60 year old milsurp than something suoer accurate. There are benchrest guys that swap out barrels when they open up to the .3's or less.

Also, most shooters go to the local shop and buy the cheapest ammo they can find, set up some tin cans, and blast away. As for sand bags and rests....you typically don't see guys at benchrest shoots standing up. Don't shoot off your hind legs in a windstorm, then say it's impossible to shoot 1" groups.
 
If America is ever invaded by a foreign power, someone will have to quickly invent a motorized bench rest with a Caldwell Lead Sled bolted to the top. It will come with its own chronograph and reloading bench to make minor adjustments to the ammo along the way. We will have to rush these contraptions into production or we will be doomed to defeat. :neener:
 
I have little doubt that plenty of "internet rounding" is applied to a lot of posted groups... (I think we had a guy in the rifle section shooting 2" at 200 yards with an "AK and regular ball ammo" over the weekend. That one gave me a chuckle, as do some others) But even for people who aren't necessarily completely making something up, omitting information via only posting the one best 3 shot group of the day, as plenty of people readily admit they do, is still misleading. One three shot group means nothing. I've been at the range and happened to have three or four consecutive shots land into an an area the size of a dime or less. Yeah, sure it was fun while it lasted and I'm sure there are plenty of people who would have stopped right there and posted that group on the internet saying their milspec AR shoots 1/4" groups when "I do my part"!!! When it becomes a 3" group after the 5th shot, well... what is a better description of the average dispersion, 1/4" or 3"?

For me personally, when I have a load that I think I like, I shoot 10 to 20 into a group, before, to me, it "shoots x.x" with this ammo, bench setup, conditions, etc".
 
I round up and never use a ruler.:uhoh:

I also play golf regularly and the same mentality exists with many golfers as with shooters. They'll take a mulligan, improve their ball position, not count penalty strokes, etc. Yet, they'll tell you with a straight face that they shot a fantastic score. And, let us not forget that it's a gentleman's game!
 
Have I said, " I have shot a phonebook at 100 yds with my reloads out of my 357 4" barrell" Yes.

did i lye.

No.

8" high at 100 yds. I can do it. consistantly.

Sound like bs.. Come to the range with me.
 
Hitting an 8"x11" target at 100 yards with a high velocity handgun is not hard to believe. You've got a long way to go before you get your internet marksman badge! :D
 
Am I a great shot?
Absolutely NOT.

Did I happen to glass bed my rifle the right way, have the gunsmith adjust my trigger to a nice clean break at about 3# and did I happen to find just the right bullet/powder/primer/seating depth combination for that particular rifle?
Absolutely!

YMMV!
 
Last edited:
Groups? Five rounds in one hole, is that a group? How far across the one hole?

Just Kidding. I don't lie about my groups because I don't talk about my groups. I actually have never been concerned about groups. I guess it is my LEO background. We always shot to hit the bad guy COM and if we did that, it was all OK.

I like to keep them close together, but I can truthfully say I have never measured a group or even estimated the spacing on a group.
 
I don't lie about my groups because I don't talk about them, and the reason why I don't talk about them is 'cause I suck.


Me too. :( :banghead:

But I'm getting better!
 
I don't have to lie about my groups ... Because I only aim for COM and call it good from there. I figure if I can hit a human sized target at reasonable distances like say ... 30 meters ... I'll be fine. I can do it on two guns so far!
 
IMHO, most of the "lies" are considering 3 or 5 shots to make a "group" or from culling out "flyers".

You need 10 shots to get statistical significance worth talking about.

Basically I don't really care much about group size other than off sandbags it tells me what size targets I need to shoot at any given range to be sure the misses are me, not the ammo. Other than setting this "baseline" and adjusting POA/POI for any given lot of ammo, I prefer to shoot standing, sitting, or prone depending on the range and adjust the targets to be ~3X the sandbag group sizes at that range. I prefer hit/miss scoring with reactive targets too.
 
Last edited:
I hate lies, but I like shooting good groups.
I'm impressed with the groups I shoot, but if they aren't impressive to anyone else, I don't really care.
 
If you want full disclosure, while I've been capable of shooting fairly tight groups since the moment I first picked up a gun--honestly, I'm a natural at it in some ways, and so is my sister who doesn't particularly like guns--I still don't do anywhere near as well in rapid fire. Currently with regard to the latter, I can routinely put every single round in the black on a bad guy silhouette target at 7 yards, including head shots when doing Mozambique drills, but my groups aren't any tighter than that. Slowing down tightens my groups, but if I can still hit the target every time (when standing still, anyway), then in an actual defensive situation, I'll be shooting fast. In the meantime, I still have to work at pretty much every aspect of shooting at the range in order to get better. I may talk like I have it all down sometimes, but that's just how I write, and I consider myself a beginner (my relative lack of experience kind of mandates it ;)). But no, I wouldn't lie or exaggerate, and I haven't (at least deliberately). If I suggest that somebody needs to work on this or that, for example, it doesn't mean that I'm so great, either, it's just a matter of helping direct one's focus in training (as well as testing my own understanding among those who may have more experience).
 
metalman8600 - Re: Because you can use them again?

I think MNGonzo was paraphrasing an old pilot's joke:

What's the difference between a good landing and a great landing?

A good landingis one that you can walk away from.

A great landingis one that you can use the airplane again!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top