Wanted to give this thing a few trips to the range before saying much about it. That done, here it goes.
I was unhappy with my S&W 637. Great for carry, but hated shooting it. I had been looking for something to replace it. Something with a bit more heft, but still pocket/ankle carryable. I saw the bobbed hammer, stainless steel 905 in the local shop one day. For those wondering what the 905 is, it is a 5 shot, steel, 9mm snubby. Well, one the employees pointed it out to me as I walked in knowing that I like the slightly-off-the-beaten-path-guns. Traded my 637 and some $$ for the 905.
Initial impression was favorable. Double action trigger pull is slightly lighter than the double action on my 686-5 and just as smooth. There is a slight stacking right before the trigger breaks. Lock up is very tight with virtually no front to back cylinder wiggle and very little side to side. Cylinder gap is about half that of a credit card. Moonclips are easy to load and easy to adjust for tightness with a screwdriver twisted between the prongs. It also fit in all my old 637 holsters (uncle mike's neoprene pocket holster, a galco pancake w/ thumbreak, and a renegade ankle holster).
Initial range trip impressed me. Recoil is very mild considering the weight and the round. Just a bit more snap than my Glock 19 (at range I shoot 115 grain winchester value pack for both).
Sights are oddly difficult to acquire and focus on. Something about the sheen of the steel and the width of the front sight. I will be painting the sights to alleviate this problem. If I recall correctly, the 637 front sight was serrated whereas the 905 is not and this may be making a difference. It also doesn't help that my standard target is nearly the same freaking color as the gun. Switched to an all black target with similar difficulty.
Did my shooting at 7 and 10 yards. With 5 rounds was doing 3" groups at 10 yards firing real slowly. That's good for me =/. RO at the NRA range did a smaller group much faster than I was. Made me sad.
Only other complaint in addition to the sights is that after about 75 rounds, the rounds no longer fall freely into place. There is a bit of resistance and you need to push the rounds in to close the cylinder. Other than the resistance after 75 or so rounds, reloading is as expected: quick and easy. The extractor does manage to fully extract the rounds due to 9mm brass being significantly shorter than .38/.357 brass. Extraction is clean and quick even with a dirty cylinder.
Pictures being developed as my digital camera is the poopy. Will post ASAP. I am carrying it today as it has been through about 600 rounds completely pain free.
P.S. It does unfortunately have the lock behind the hammer.
I was unhappy with my S&W 637. Great for carry, but hated shooting it. I had been looking for something to replace it. Something with a bit more heft, but still pocket/ankle carryable. I saw the bobbed hammer, stainless steel 905 in the local shop one day. For those wondering what the 905 is, it is a 5 shot, steel, 9mm snubby. Well, one the employees pointed it out to me as I walked in knowing that I like the slightly-off-the-beaten-path-guns. Traded my 637 and some $$ for the 905.
Initial impression was favorable. Double action trigger pull is slightly lighter than the double action on my 686-5 and just as smooth. There is a slight stacking right before the trigger breaks. Lock up is very tight with virtually no front to back cylinder wiggle and very little side to side. Cylinder gap is about half that of a credit card. Moonclips are easy to load and easy to adjust for tightness with a screwdriver twisted between the prongs. It also fit in all my old 637 holsters (uncle mike's neoprene pocket holster, a galco pancake w/ thumbreak, and a renegade ankle holster).
Initial range trip impressed me. Recoil is very mild considering the weight and the round. Just a bit more snap than my Glock 19 (at range I shoot 115 grain winchester value pack for both).
Sights are oddly difficult to acquire and focus on. Something about the sheen of the steel and the width of the front sight. I will be painting the sights to alleviate this problem. If I recall correctly, the 637 front sight was serrated whereas the 905 is not and this may be making a difference. It also doesn't help that my standard target is nearly the same freaking color as the gun. Switched to an all black target with similar difficulty.
Did my shooting at 7 and 10 yards. With 5 rounds was doing 3" groups at 10 yards firing real slowly. That's good for me =/. RO at the NRA range did a smaller group much faster than I was. Made me sad.
Only other complaint in addition to the sights is that after about 75 rounds, the rounds no longer fall freely into place. There is a bit of resistance and you need to push the rounds in to close the cylinder. Other than the resistance after 75 or so rounds, reloading is as expected: quick and easy. The extractor does manage to fully extract the rounds due to 9mm brass being significantly shorter than .38/.357 brass. Extraction is clean and quick even with a dirty cylinder.
Pictures being developed as my digital camera is the poopy. Will post ASAP. I am carrying it today as it has been through about 600 rounds completely pain free.
P.S. It does unfortunately have the lock behind the hammer.