Car Knocker
Member
Gun dealer to plead in Trolley Square gun case
By Geoffrey Fattah
Deseret Morning News
Published: November 20, 2007
The West Valley gun dealer accused of selling the shotgun used in the Trolley Square massacre has reached a plea agreement with federal prosecutors.
Court documents filed Monday show that 39-year-old Westley Wayne Hill has requested a change of plea hearing on Nov. 26.
Hill is accused of selling a Maverick Arms Model 88 12-gauge shotgun to then 18-year-old Sulejman Talovic on Nov. 13, 2006. On Feb. 12, 2007, Talovic walked into the Trolley Square mall, armed with the shotgun and a handgun, and killed five people and wounded four others before perishing in a shootout with police.
News of the pending agreement comes after a federal judge was considering whether to throw out the charge against Hill. Through his attorney, Hill claims the charge of selling a firearm to an unauthorized person should be dropped because federal gun laws are too vague.
Federal prosecutors had argued that because the shotgun was equipped with a pistol grip, it made it illegal for Hill to sell the shotgun to anyone under 21.
Hill was scheduled to stand trial on Nov. 26.
If Hill pleads guilty to a reduced charge, he will be the last to do so of the four men charged with selling firearms to Talovic.
Three men, Mackenzie Hunter, Brenden Taylor Brown and Matthew Hautala, were charged with selling a .38 special handgun to Talovic for $800. All three men have pleaded guilty as part of their own plea agreements. Brown and Hautala were both sentenced to one year probation. Hunter is scheduled to be sentenced Jan. 14.
Federal prosecutors say the handgun came from a young Idaho man, who stole the gun from his father to trade for drugs.
http://deseretnews.com/article/content/mobile/0,5223,695229385,00.html
*******************
I try to keep up on this kind of stuff but I don't recall any federal age differentiation to buy shotguns based on stock configuration. I just cruised through 18 USC 922 and didn't see anything there but then I may well have missed an applicable clause in that mess. Will someone point me to the appropriate code, please?
By Geoffrey Fattah
Deseret Morning News
Published: November 20, 2007
The West Valley gun dealer accused of selling the shotgun used in the Trolley Square massacre has reached a plea agreement with federal prosecutors.
Court documents filed Monday show that 39-year-old Westley Wayne Hill has requested a change of plea hearing on Nov. 26.
Hill is accused of selling a Maverick Arms Model 88 12-gauge shotgun to then 18-year-old Sulejman Talovic on Nov. 13, 2006. On Feb. 12, 2007, Talovic walked into the Trolley Square mall, armed with the shotgun and a handgun, and killed five people and wounded four others before perishing in a shootout with police.
News of the pending agreement comes after a federal judge was considering whether to throw out the charge against Hill. Through his attorney, Hill claims the charge of selling a firearm to an unauthorized person should be dropped because federal gun laws are too vague.
Federal prosecutors had argued that because the shotgun was equipped with a pistol grip, it made it illegal for Hill to sell the shotgun to anyone under 21.
Hill was scheduled to stand trial on Nov. 26.
If Hill pleads guilty to a reduced charge, he will be the last to do so of the four men charged with selling firearms to Talovic.
Three men, Mackenzie Hunter, Brenden Taylor Brown and Matthew Hautala, were charged with selling a .38 special handgun to Talovic for $800. All three men have pleaded guilty as part of their own plea agreements. Brown and Hautala were both sentenced to one year probation. Hunter is scheduled to be sentenced Jan. 14.
Federal prosecutors say the handgun came from a young Idaho man, who stole the gun from his father to trade for drugs.
http://deseretnews.com/article/content/mobile/0,5223,695229385,00.html
*******************
I try to keep up on this kind of stuff but I don't recall any federal age differentiation to buy shotguns based on stock configuration. I just cruised through 18 USC 922 and didn't see anything there but then I may well have missed an applicable clause in that mess. Will someone point me to the appropriate code, please?