stevereno1
Member
I Have never had a jam in either of my glocks. I don't know what to tell you.
It's 209 current Kimber owners in a pro-Kimber forum (likely to be pretty honest). Are you suggesting that it's a bad sample? You know, people spread out across the country who purchased their guns at different times vs. people in the same town or state that purchased them roughly at the same time? It's a very good sample...Based on 209 voters. You can hardly base an entire manufacturer's reliability on 209 votes.
Are you suggesting that it's a bad sample?
Are you suggesting that it's a bad sample?
Hell, they can poll 1,000 people and can tell you who the next President will be many times, and within a few points.
If this is a true story
I called GLOCK USA this morning and they want the pistol back. I'll box it up and ship it out. I'll post again with an update.
Quote:
If this is a true story
Ya' got me man; I've got nothing better to do with my time than to come on a damn internet forum and complain about a gun I dont really own.
Ammunition was Monarch
If this is a true story
I'm calling BS. People create these threads to try and discredit Glocks. When Glocks jam, it's ammo related. This thread is a conspiracy in the making.
I'm calling BS. People create these threads to try and discredit Glocks. When Glocks jam, it's ammo related. This thread is a conspiracy in the making.
That is cool. In a fair world they should also have covered your shipping costs to them.They did replace the magazine I had marked for free. They also covered shipping back to me , which I thought was cool.
If he isn't, I am. No internet forum poll is worth the electrons its transmitted with, scientifically speaking. Now, can it still be useful information? Sure, but you need to be aware of its utter lack of scientific value.It's 209 current Kimber owners in a pro-Kimber forum (likely to be pretty honest). Are you suggesting that it's a bad sample?
The problem is not with any of that, but with selection bias. Who goes to an internet discussion forum for a specific type of gun? People who really like their guns, people who really hate their guns, and people who are having problems with their guns. Say what you like about one group cancelling the other out, but that's unbridled and unwarranted optimism. What's missing is the big fat middle of the bell curve, where the people who aren't haters and aren't fanboys dwell.You know, people spread out across the country who purchased their guns at different times vs. people in the same town or state that purchased them roughly at the same time?
Take a statistics class and a research methods class and get back to me on that.It's a very good sample...
Yeah, because they actually use randomization in their sample selection.Hell, they can poll 1,000 people and can tell you who the next President will be many times, and within a few points.
Heh. OK.LOL, I just loving readying silly excuses.
That's probably true. I doubt their failure rate was that high (5% is massize), but there are a lot of companies that produce bad product but survive on their logo...for a while.As for the Glocks, I'm not arguing they are junk or that they are poorly made. I believe quite the opposite to be true. I was taking issue with your notion a company could turn out 5% lemons and be forced out of business. Sure, it could happen but there are companies that turn out product that have a much higher failure rate than 5% and still have a loyal following. Heck, Colt did for YEARS (high failure rate) and throughout their darkest hours they still had loyalists and people buying their products.