Nightcrawler
Member
A little early morn philosophy for you.
I've been thinking. THe last few times I was shooting, I was a lot more interested in shooting my two revolvers than I was my CZ-97. It's not that the CZ has given me any trouble since I got it throat/polished, it's just that...I think my tastes are changing. I notice that nearly all of the handguns that I want are revolvers now, and I'm not really lusting after any automatics. I really like the CZ-97, and kind of want one of those new rollstamp Colt Government Models, but I'm not drooling over the bottom-feeders like I once used to.
I guess revolvers just have more personality for me.
I don't have what I'd consider a "practical", all-around revolver as of yet, though. I mean, I have the 25-5 in .45 Colt, and the 57 in .41 Mag. Both are excellent guns, but having 6" barrels they're too big and heavy to fit my criteria as an all-rounder.
Another thing that's been a near-constant annoyance for both of them has been finding quality ammunition of decent power to practice with. .41 is plenty powerful, but costs $25/50rds if you can find it at all. .45 Colt is all over the place, but it's mostly anemic Cowboy loads, that have a 255 grain lead bullet falling out of the barrel at 700-750 feet per second.
Currently, my 25-5 is down. It needs to go back to Smith and Wesson for repairs, and I'm going to look into that today. I'm also going to see if they can't rebarrel it to 4"; doing so would make it pretty close to what I want. I also want to get the .41 rebarreled, eventually. I really don't have much use for a 6" revolver, overall, and now that I'm thinking about it am kicking myself for spending $30 on an Uncle Mike's shoulder holster designed for 6" N-frames (though it will work with 4" ones, too).
In the past, I've sold guns to fund new ones, but I won't sell either of my revolvers. Primarily because they don't make either of those models anymore and there's no telling if I'd actually be able to replace them.
I've thought about getting a 4" .44 Mag. It would fit all of my criteria and would solve my ammo-hunting problems. Plus, Buffalo Bore makes a .44 Special load (255 grain Keith @ 1000fps) that is prettymuch the exact load I wish somebody'd make in .45 Colt.
But .44 Mag is so passe'. Everybody has a .44 Mag, whereas you don't see a lot of .45 Colt DA wheelguns around.
I really liked that Scandium .44 Mag that Smith and Wesson makes now when I handled one. It was unique and unusual enough to really tempt my eclectic side. I wondered if it wasn't what I'm looking for. It's certainly handy, has a 4" barrel, fires a big bore cartridge, and looks really really cool. But, it's so light that I've heard it's practically unusable with .44 Magnum loads, and while there are plenty of good .44 Special loads to be had, they're harder to find than off-the-shelf UMC .44 Mag fodder that I'd like to practice with, and I really don't want to get carpal tunnel.
In any case, if I ever do find the revolver I'm looking for, the CZ-97 might be sacrificed in order to fund its purchase. As I said, I guess my tastes have changed. I might be turning into a straight-up wheelgun guy nowadays.
How very un-tactical of me, with only six shots and everything.
I've been thinking. THe last few times I was shooting, I was a lot more interested in shooting my two revolvers than I was my CZ-97. It's not that the CZ has given me any trouble since I got it throat/polished, it's just that...I think my tastes are changing. I notice that nearly all of the handguns that I want are revolvers now, and I'm not really lusting after any automatics. I really like the CZ-97, and kind of want one of those new rollstamp Colt Government Models, but I'm not drooling over the bottom-feeders like I once used to.
I guess revolvers just have more personality for me.
I don't have what I'd consider a "practical", all-around revolver as of yet, though. I mean, I have the 25-5 in .45 Colt, and the 57 in .41 Mag. Both are excellent guns, but having 6" barrels they're too big and heavy to fit my criteria as an all-rounder.
Another thing that's been a near-constant annoyance for both of them has been finding quality ammunition of decent power to practice with. .41 is plenty powerful, but costs $25/50rds if you can find it at all. .45 Colt is all over the place, but it's mostly anemic Cowboy loads, that have a 255 grain lead bullet falling out of the barrel at 700-750 feet per second.
Currently, my 25-5 is down. It needs to go back to Smith and Wesson for repairs, and I'm going to look into that today. I'm also going to see if they can't rebarrel it to 4"; doing so would make it pretty close to what I want. I also want to get the .41 rebarreled, eventually. I really don't have much use for a 6" revolver, overall, and now that I'm thinking about it am kicking myself for spending $30 on an Uncle Mike's shoulder holster designed for 6" N-frames (though it will work with 4" ones, too).
In the past, I've sold guns to fund new ones, but I won't sell either of my revolvers. Primarily because they don't make either of those models anymore and there's no telling if I'd actually be able to replace them.
I've thought about getting a 4" .44 Mag. It would fit all of my criteria and would solve my ammo-hunting problems. Plus, Buffalo Bore makes a .44 Special load (255 grain Keith @ 1000fps) that is prettymuch the exact load I wish somebody'd make in .45 Colt.
But .44 Mag is so passe'. Everybody has a .44 Mag, whereas you don't see a lot of .45 Colt DA wheelguns around.
I really liked that Scandium .44 Mag that Smith and Wesson makes now when I handled one. It was unique and unusual enough to really tempt my eclectic side. I wondered if it wasn't what I'm looking for. It's certainly handy, has a 4" barrel, fires a big bore cartridge, and looks really really cool. But, it's so light that I've heard it's practically unusable with .44 Magnum loads, and while there are plenty of good .44 Special loads to be had, they're harder to find than off-the-shelf UMC .44 Mag fodder that I'd like to practice with, and I really don't want to get carpal tunnel.
In any case, if I ever do find the revolver I'm looking for, the CZ-97 might be sacrificed in order to fund its purchase. As I said, I guess my tastes have changed. I might be turning into a straight-up wheelgun guy nowadays.
How very un-tactical of me, with only six shots and everything.