F4GIB said:I keep hearing this but I've never seen any proof. Can you post some?
F4GIB said:I keep hearing this but I've never seen any proof. Can you post some?
No - that's more Hollywood hogwash.well,would they have got sucked outta the airplane a la goldfinger,or not?
No - that's more Hollywood hogwash.
progunner1957 said:One interesting thing that happens with depressurization caused by a bullet hole or other small hole is that the oxygen molecules exit the pressure hull breach much more quickly than do the water molecules in the air, creating fog in the cabin. That is about as much drama as you get with a hull depressurization, along with the oxygen masks deploying.
jlbraun said:3, repeat, 3, feet of water is enough to keep you safe from all supersonic rounds up to and including .50 BMG!
Rosstradamus said:That contradicts tests the Navy Bureau of Ordnance conducted, as cited in Hatcher's Notebook. Pages 405-408 in my 1966 edition.
bogie said:Just guessing here, but the boys seem fairly firearms savvy, and given that they do hollywood special effects, they may actually have a mfg license...
Flyboy said:No, it makes the string a machinegun.
This, folks, is your government.
...which makes it subject to the very same regulations as a machinegun.Actually it makes the string the auto sear for the machinegun...
Flyboy said:Further, given the BATFE's creative license with the idea of "constructive posession," it makes anybody with an AR and a spool of twine a potential felon.
LMAO At this.
There have been several devices over the years that attached to the trigger and via a crank, would depress the trigger thus firing the weapon.
These have all been determined as to the best of my knowledge to be classified as a nothing. You have not altered the firearm to cause more than one shot to be fired at a time with a single depressing of the trigger.
You are simply pulling the trigger faster.
Been in the business a good many yrs with my own Class III toys.
But it has been fun reading the opinions an entertaining as well.