Gentleman, I have appreciated all your input on the NAA .22 magnum and the holsters you have made or purchased and just the overall discussion. Now I would like your opinion on which of the following three guns you would carry? I have other more powerful hand guns ( 410/45 Judge, a couple 9 mm Glocks and etc) that hold more rounds,but they are all physically bigger, but the clothes I wear most of the time do not hide the fact that I am carrying and I prefer not to let others know that. I know that the debate goes on about what caliber gun you should carry, and that debate will never end, but it all boils down to the age old statement that the best gun for protection is the one you will always have with you! The picture I am including has the NAA .22 Mag on the left, (I am sure everyone can tell that), the middle one is a Ruger LCP II .380 with a 6 round clip, and the on on the right is a Taurus PT .22 LR with a 8 round clip. Some of my thoughts on which one to carry are as follows, the Taurus PT .22 LR is the least powerful, but it carries two more rounds in th clip and the grip fits my big hand very well, The Ruger LCP II .380 is the more powerful of the three, but the barrel is about 1/2" longer and it only holds 6 rounds in the clip. The smallest and the one I have carried everyday ( because it is by far the easiest to conceal) for a couple of years is the NAA .22 Mag, but due to a recent accidental discharge issue, I now only have only 4 rounds in the cylinder, and I never was that comfortable with it when I had 5 in it. So as most decisions are in life, it is a trade off, more rounds, and more powerful, vs easier to conceal? What is your thoughts on this?
Thanks for your input in advance.