lostone1413
Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2004
- Messages
- 447
Be a cake walk getting it through. Remember last Noverber all the Pro gun people we elected. You mean the so called Pro Gun people made a fool of us voters LOL I think so
LAR-15 said:Yes that is the bill.
Please contact Chairman Howard Coble about it:
Honorable Howard Coble
2468 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515-3306
(202) 225-3065
Rep Coble decides if this bill is brought for a vote.
LAR-15 said:Bingo!
That's all you gotta do.
ElTacoGrande said:There are two issues with this bill:
On the bad side, it is a case of the federal government telling states what to do. I don't like that.
On the good side, this is the only way there will EVER be reasonable CCW in some die-hard states, namely NY and HI. I believe we will get proper CCW in CA eventually, but states like NY and NJ (with a history of mafia involvement in politics) and HI (with a history of a recent monarchy and caste system) will never ever get their own CCW systems. Strangely, all three of those states (NY, NJ and HI) all have may-issue on the books, but it will never be available to mere citizens.
So I guess this is like the federal civil rights laws. I don't like the fact that they bring federal power into states, but they are the only way that certain states will have non-discretionary freedom.
And I do like the idea of being able to carry easily in NY and CA (especially in San Francisco!).
Does this have any real chance of passing and getting signed?
No, it's delegated to the people.the right to keep and bear arms IS delegated to the UNITED STATES by the Consititution
Don't Tread On Me said:State/local is the ticket. Federally, we just need to fend off new gun bans, but forget about actually becoming pro-gun. Sorry for being a pessimist, I am just reporting what I see.
Add to that the left-of-center majority in the Senate . . .But as you said, legislators from solid pro-gun states have no reason to support this bill. And most of the legislators from anti-gun states would oppose it, so the only legislators with a solid reason to support it are the few strong pro-gun legislators from anti-gun states. That does not make it seem likely to me.
Do you like being able to drive into other states with your license from another state and be legal? How about being married? Want to be married in one state and then move to another and not be recognized as married anymore? Or even while jsut traveling through it?
Apples and oranges.Do you like being able to drive into other states with your license from another state and be legal? How about being married? Want to be married in one state and then move to another and not be recognized as married anymore? Or even while jsut traveling through it?
the right to keep and bear arms IS delegated to the UNITED STATES by the Consititution. the states do not have the right to restrict your right to keep and bear arms!
And (up till recently anyway) so was being self reliant and taking care of yourself without expecting others to do so.Marriage is an institution