Posts like this really make me wonder if the new generation of reloaders feel loading manuals are optional.
In fairness - after reloading for over 25yrs myself and having somewhere over 2dozen manuals, my first stop for data when I want to look something up is the internet. My manuals are on a shelf beside my home office desk, I don't even have to stand up to reach my Berger, Nosler, or Hornady books (the others are a bit of a reach past those), but it's just as fast for me to click the bookmarks on my computer to open Hodgdon, Alliant, nosler, etc, then the bookmarks to handloads.com and loaddata.com, etc.
Plus - I can access those all when I'm not even at home. Carrying around 150lbs of manuals is a challenge, but I can get a ton of good manual data from my pocket manual - er, iPhone.
Asking online is usually also worthwhile, as you can find known, proven, good accuracy loads which might be buried among a dozen other powders and hidden within a span of a few grains. Building from prior knowledge is often called, "standing on the shoulders of giants," meaning it's much easier to reach heights even if you're not tall yourself if you get a boost from someone who is. Nobody should take Internet data without confirming in a proven manual OR working up the loads themselves, but if you have a starting point, you're better off than not.
It's 2017, data is invisible now, and free, and instead of getting loading data from Uncle Bob, guys have access to thousands of other experienced reloaders. We'd be foolish not to take advantage.