Guys,
I am in the process on buying a new pistol, I had narrow down my choices to the Ruger KP-89 and the Springfield XD9 Subcompact. I shot a XD40 Subcompact last week and I really like it (the grip is shorter like the glock 26, but nothing that can be fix with an extended finger base plate fron pierce), I have not had the opportunity to shoot a KP89 yet, but I heard is a tough pistol. Does anyone had the experience with both pistols? This pistol will be my carry gun while off duty.
Things in favor for the KP-89: stainless steel, high capacity, manual safety (for those who likes that feature, I don´t really like it). Now thing in favor for the XD9 Subcompact: smaller, lightweight, 10 rounds capacity (more than enough to get me out of trouble) and very accurate. The climate where I live is very humid and hot.
I will appreciate you comments on this matter.
I am in the process on buying a new pistol, I had narrow down my choices to the Ruger KP-89 and the Springfield XD9 Subcompact. I shot a XD40 Subcompact last week and I really like it (the grip is shorter like the glock 26, but nothing that can be fix with an extended finger base plate fron pierce), I have not had the opportunity to shoot a KP89 yet, but I heard is a tough pistol. Does anyone had the experience with both pistols? This pistol will be my carry gun while off duty.
Things in favor for the KP-89: stainless steel, high capacity, manual safety (for those who likes that feature, I don´t really like it). Now thing in favor for the XD9 Subcompact: smaller, lightweight, 10 rounds capacity (more than enough to get me out of trouble) and very accurate. The climate where I live is very humid and hot.
I will appreciate you comments on this matter.