Probably some sort of "safety" feature would prevent folding the rifle with one in the mag well, but if not, it wouldn't be necessary to snap the buttstock on the barrel. The extra space taken would be tiny.
The trigger guard actually goes into the mag well when folded, so a mag can't be there. So, even though it folds into a "smallish" package, readying the rifle would consist of unfolding, locking, inserting mag, and chambering a round. Seems like enough stuff to do that you would never use it for a any sort of situation that would call for a weapon to be instantly ready. At which point, the few extra seconds to assemble an AR-15 are moot.
Not to mention, because of the lack of a pistol grip, there's no reason why some sort of folding stock (where the rifle could remain loaded, and even fire from the closed position) couldn't have been legally used instead - except perhaps in a handful of states, of course.
I guess I just don't get it... the folded package doesn't really seem that small - 26" is the length, and it seems like the "width" would be nearly 8-10". Not something you could really shove into a backpack easily (unlike the sub-2000) and it seems like a fixed stock gun that is instantly available would be a better choice for a "trunk" gun, given that you can't even have a mag in the magwell when folded here.
Rocko
Last edited: