Tigerclaw_x
Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2007
- Messages
- 113
1. ATI FS9 by TASIS. Turkish gun. Have not heard anything about them other that they have "very solid feel" to them. I contacted manufacturer and they assured me that I can buy spare parts from them directly. Cost $300 new. Has compesnated barrel/slide and frame mounted safety
2. 24/7 OSS by taurus. These can now be had for $350 new. Very comfortable. Trigger seems to be okay. However, online there is a lot of heresay about them. Most people seem to love 9mm version. Anyone has any insight about them? Taurus guys assured me that if I have any problems they will be there - full repair, no questions asked.
3. PT92, also Taurus. Now can be had for about $430 new. This is most expensive out of the 3, and My budget is $350-380 tops. I held one, it FEELS better then Beretta - love 3 position frame mounted safety. I like double action trigger on it better then on basic beretta 92. However in single action Beretta 92 seemed better. From what I red most people like later models of PT92
In all guns my main issue is RELIABILITY. I want my gun to be reliable and REASONABLY accurate. I am no sniper, I do 4 inch groups at 15 meters with CZ82, firing Brown bear one handed olympic style...
I would love to have more info on RELIABILITY of these 3 guns. As much of detailed information about potential problems/failures as you can give me. Thanx
2. 24/7 OSS by taurus. These can now be had for $350 new. Very comfortable. Trigger seems to be okay. However, online there is a lot of heresay about them. Most people seem to love 9mm version. Anyone has any insight about them? Taurus guys assured me that if I have any problems they will be there - full repair, no questions asked.
3. PT92, also Taurus. Now can be had for about $430 new. This is most expensive out of the 3, and My budget is $350-380 tops. I held one, it FEELS better then Beretta - love 3 position frame mounted safety. I like double action trigger on it better then on basic beretta 92. However in single action Beretta 92 seemed better. From what I red most people like later models of PT92
In all guns my main issue is RELIABILITY. I want my gun to be reliable and REASONABLY accurate. I am no sniper, I do 4 inch groups at 15 meters with CZ82, firing Brown bear one handed olympic style...
I would love to have more info on RELIABILITY of these 3 guns. As much of detailed information about potential problems/failures as you can give me. Thanx
