New Colt SAA

vanfunk

Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2003
Messages
1,272
Location
The widening gyre
Hi All:

So I was looking for a Colt SAA recently and couldn’t find any locally. I scoured Gunbroker but was unable to find a good example that was in the price range I considered reasonable, but I put what I thought was a longshot bid on a no-reserve auction for a good-looking 3rd Gen Colt. The auction was lengthy and to tell the truth, I kind of forgot about it. Meanwhile, I found a Standard Manufacturing SAA (posted about previously) at a LGS and decided to make it mine.

The Standard is finished to a very high “standard” of course. My example has few if any flaws; if I really nitpick I could say that the front sight could have been better blended into the barrel. The case colors are fantastic although I am not sure how much I like the lacquered finish; I may still decide to take that off with some xylene or some other carcinogenic solvent. The grips are beautiful, figured walnut and those fire-blued, qualified screws… they’re, well, really nice.

Anyway, now to the subject at hand; I won the auction for the Colt! In breaking one of my cardinal rules - never buy a gun I haven’t handled in person - I was a little apprehensive. Fortunately when I arrived at my FFL and unboxed it, I realized my fears were for naught. Initial inspection revealed a couple of extremely light, superficial scratches at the end of the barrel, the kind of thing that could easily be picked up with a couple of incidental rubs against another gun in a case or a safe. All pet peeves were absent - no overpolished backstrap radius (the dreaded “rabbit ears”), no gap between the frame and trigger guard, no dished screw holes. Great start! All paperwork was in the blue box. SN is in the S88XXXA range which I think makes it only a year or two old? Not sure. Edited to add: mine was made in 2020.

How does it compare to the Standard? Extremely well. The bluing is as good if not identical to the Standard. The quality of the case colors is the same, with the exception that the Standard’s appear more vibrant due to the clearcoat lacquer. The fit of the loading gate is almost seamless on the Standard. On the Colt, the seam is more prominent but the fit is still excellent. The Standard has nicer grips by far; the Colt plastic Eagle grips can’t hold a candle to the beauty of the Standard’s figured walnut. The Colt’s fit the frame perfectly, however, with no over-or under-hang anywhere. The action springs are lighter on the Standard but both have crisp triggers in the 2.5-3lb range with no creep and very minimal overtravel.

How does the Colt shoot? Very well. Teeny SAA sights and my left-eye-dominant, right-handed shooting had me printing a little left of center with Fiocchi 255 grain ammo (rated at 750 fps). Nevertheless I was able to shoot this approx. 1.5” group at my typical .20 yard range. Those loads are very light and feel like .38s in the hogleg. We’ll see soon how it handles my usual handload of a 250 RNFP at ~930 fos.
IMG_3406.jpeg
IMG_3407.jpeg
IMG_3408.jpeg

Summary: what’s not to LOVE about this Colt? Unless you don’t like SAA revolvers, this new Colt is really spectacularly made. The Standard is a better gun in an absolute sense - no cast parts, the superb fit of all metal parts, the gorgeous walnut stocks, the fire blue screws - yes, it’s “better.” But that’s not damning of the Colt in the least. I am uproariously happy with this example. If mine is indicative of current production, I’d encourage anyone interested in an SAA to get one without any reservations. It is rumored that Colt will now be picking up production now that CZ owns the company though I have no idea as to the veracity of the claim. They are pumping out a lot of Pythons, Anacondas and King Cobras, though. Anyway, hope you enjoy the review and the pics!
 
Last edited:
Hi All:

So I was looking for a Colt SAA recently and couldn’t find any locally. I scoured Gunbroker but was unable to find a good example that was in the price range I considered reasonable, but I put what I thought was a longshot bid on a no-reserve auction for a good-looking 3rd Gen Colt. The auction was lengthy and to tell the truth, I kind of forgot about it. Meanwhile, I found a Standard Manufacturing SAA (posted about previously) at a LGS and decided to make it mine.

The Standard is finished to a very high “standard” of course. My example has few if any flaws; if I really nitpick I could say that the front sight could have been better blended into the barrel. The case colors are fantastic although I am sure how much I like the lacquered finish; I may still decide to take that off with some xylene or some other carcinogenic solvent. The grips are beautiful, figured walnut and those fire-blued, qualified screws… they’re, well, really nice.

Anyway, now to the subject at hand; I won the auction for the Colt! In breaking one of my cardinal rules - never buy a gun I haven’t handled in person - I was a little apprehensive. Fortunately when I arrived at my FFL and unboxed it, I realized my fears were for naught. Initial inspection revealed a couple of extremely light, superficial scratches at the end of the barrel, the kind of thing that could easily be picked up with a couple of incidental rubs against another gun in a case or a safe. All pet peeves were absent - no overpolished backstrap radius (the dreaded “rabbit ears”), no gap between the frame and trigger guard, no dished screw holes. Great start! All paperwork was in the blue box. SN is in the S88XXXA range which I think makes it only a year or two old? Not sure.

How does it compare to the Standard? Extremely well. The bluing is as good if not identical to the Standard. The quality of the case colors is the same, with the exception that the Standard’s appear more vibrant due to the clearcoat lacquer. The fit of the loading gate is almost seamless on the Standard. On the Colt, the seam is more prominent but the fit is still excellent. The Standard has nicer grips by far; the Colt plastic Eagle grips can’t hold a candle to the beauty of the Standard’s figured walnut. The Colt’s fit the frame perfectly, however, with no over-or under-hang anywhere. The action springs are lighter on the Standard but both have crisp triggers in the 2.5-3lb range with no creep and very minimal overtravel.

How does the Colt shoot? Very well. Teeny SAA sights and my left-eye-dominant, right-handed shooting had me printing a little left of center with Fiocchi 255 grain ammo (rated at 750 fps). Nevertheless I was able to shoot this approx. 1.5” group at my typical .20 yard range. Those loads are very light and feel like .38s in the hogleg. We’ll see soon how it handles my usual handload of a 250 RNFP at ~930 fos.
View attachment 1182258
View attachment 1182259
View attachment 1182260

Summary: what’s not to LOVE about this Colt? Unless you don’t like SAA revolvers, this new Colt is really spectacularly made. The Standard is a better gun in an absolute sense - no cast parts, the superb fit of all metal parts, the gorgeous walnut stocks, the fire blue screws - yes, it’s “better.” But that’s not damning of the Colt in the least. I am uproariously happy with this example. If mine is indicative of current production, I’d encourage anyone interested in an SAA to get one without any reservations. It is rumored that Colt will now be picking up production now that CZ owns the company though I have no idea as to the veracity of the claim. They are pumping out a lot of Pythons, Anacondas and King Cobras, though. Anyway, hope you enjoy the review and the pics!
Alright! million dollar question… What did you pay for that Honey!
 
Mighty purty! Those screw slots in particular are amazing -- either the previous owners never messed with them or they've been replaced. It's rare to find an SAA around here without at least one buggered screw slot.

Were you holding center on that target? Sight regulation isn't too bad at 20 yards -- still in the chest anyway.
 
Hi Dave:

Yes, I hate buggered screw heads and I was glad to find this “used” example that I’m sure hadn’t been fired, much less ever had a screwdriver taken to it.

I was using a six o’clock hold on the bottom of the red oblong “bullseye” in the target. I usually shoot fixed-sight guns a bit to the left; I think it’s a combination of my astigmatism, my left-eye dominance but right-handedness, and my overall poor vision. Oh, also trigger finger position. When I really concentrate, take my time between shots and really focus on the front sight, AND use only the tip of my trigger finger, the groups magically move into the bullseye. I’m also impressed with the accuracy of this Colt - it’s very capable of 1” offhand groups at 20 yards. It was also really fun going 10 for 10 on the 50 yard swinging steel silhouette. I love the “BANG… DING!” of those big 250 grain pumpkins lobbing out there.

I’ve been a hardcore .357 and .44 Magnum fan and love shooting my Pythons, Anaconda and 629, but between the Standard and this new Colt, I am really digging the pace and sentimental historical satisfaction of the old smokepoles. I might even load up some “Holy Black” loads with the pound of FFG I just picked up for my flintlock muskets.
 
Last edited:
I've always wanted a genuine Colt, but the price has kept me away, and then, too, I'd be hesitant to shoot it.
Italian clones work for me, no guilt in using them.
But for the OP, God love you, you didn't mind the money, and you're actually shooting it! Good on ya! :)
Moon
 
Back
Top