It's a fine HD weapon, I just think some other guns are much more suited for the role.I agree that a rail is for a HD weapon, I disagree that a 1911 is not a good HD weapon.
It's a fine HD weapon, I just think some other guns are much more suited for the role.I agree that a rail is for a HD weapon, I disagree that a 1911 is not a good HD weapon.
I swear I don't understand the FUDD hatred of any advancement in firearms. If some people had their way we would still be using Single shot Rifles and Break top revolvers.
Guess so... nah I'm just kidding. If I may ask though, what make and model is it, and what do you have it loaded with?My go to HD weapon is a Railed 1911 with Trijicon Night Sights.
Guess I must be an idiot!
It's a fine HD weapon, I just think some other guns are much more suited for the role.
The way I see it, if you have enough room to, you might as well stagger your bullets and get greater capacity, I would also think that if you could, you would go with a gun that was designed to feed hollowpoints, and one that would feed them reliably without spending a fortune. I'm not hating on 1911's, but my favorite aspects of the design are looks and the slim profile.OK, but why.
I would also think that if you could, you would go with a gun that was designed to feed hollow-points, and one that would feed them reliably without spending a fortune.
you would go with a gun that was designed to feed hollowpoints, and one that would feed them reliably without spending a fortune.
I've shot plenty of 1911's, both my own and others, and they generally tend to be more finicky than modern designs.I could be wrong, but you sound like you have little first hand experience with the 1911. Or, you have been shooting one that has been "improved".
I would feel pretty much the same about a good 9mm hollowpoint, and a .45 fmj, in terms of stopping power, so if I had to choose between the two I would obviously go with the 9mm for greater capacity and controllability(and thus greater shot placement).But for an HD gun, I would just go with .40 JHPs, I see them as on about the same level of effectiveness with .45 HP's, and higher capacity is always a bonus.But I have never felt undergunned with FMJ's in my 1911. I could not say that same thing when I have carried 9mm.
One of my points was that a quality 1911 is generally more expensive than a quality glock or XD, you're paying much more for the same relative performance.I am not sure who really pointed this out. But when you say Glock or XD you are talking about a single builder. When you say 1911 you are talking about who knows how many builders. And some of these builders have made some real garbage. Buy quality, buy Colt (or which one you have determined is "the" 1911)
Why limit yourself? What could you possibly gain from having fewer shots? What practical HD applicable advantage does your colt have over a .45 XD or Glock?Unless I am attacked by a zombie hoard I am quite confident my 8+1 of .45 ACP will be able to defend me and my household.
Oh yes, let's further disadvantage the .45 hollowpoint that already has enough trouble expanding so we can shoot them in our 1911's.The 1911 was designed to handle a certain ogive. Most bullet manufacturers have begun to understand this.
And will cost considerably more than the average Glock or XD.The average Colt, DW, Springer will handle HP's just fine.
Rock Island Armory. About the same price as a GLOCK.One of my points was that a quality 1911 is generally more expensive than a quality glock or XD, you're paying much more for the same relative performance.
Oh yes, let's further disadvantage the .45 hollowpoint that already has enough trouble expanding so we can shoot them in our 1911's.
Ergonomics - very important under stress.Why limit yourself? What could you possibly gain from having fewer shots? What practical HD applicable advantage does your colt have over a .45 XD or Glock?
Sure does, and to many, it is worth the extra bucks. Shoot what you wish.And will cost considerably more than the average Glock or XD.
Been there, done that, and was very disappointed. The thing jammed every mag with fmj's, I didn't even bother with HP's.Rock Island Armory. About the same price as a GLOCK.
Now that I can agree with, some 1911's look good that way, such as Guncrafter's model 2.Also, I'd like to point out that I can only stomach rails on 1911s if they have a full dustcover.
Can't recall off the top of my head, but the fact of the matter is that with such a slow moving round, a hollowpint's design should revolve around maximizing expansion, not pandering to a century old design.What ballistic gellatin are you quoting?
Ergonomics are highly subjective, a beretta m9 or cz 75 feels better in my hand than a 1911, and having a manual safety to fiddle with isn't exactly optimized for stressfull situations. A lightweight trigger will certainly help you discharge your gun accidentally, but I don't see how it will help much in a life or death situation.Ergonomics - very important under stress.
Great Trigger - also important under stress.
I guess you can't. Try looking into HST, Ranger, Gold Dots, and Sabers.Can't recall off the top of my head,
It is not a fact; it is your supposition. And there is a reason a century old design is still around. It works, and works well.but the fact of the matter is that with such a slow moving round, a hollowpint's design should revolve around maximizing expansion, not pandering to a century old design.
There are certain standards by which handguns are judged. In the realm of ergonomics and revolvers, it is the Colt SAA. With autos, it's the 1911.Ergonomics are highly subjective, a beretta m9 or cz 75 feels better in my hand than a 1911, and having a manual safety to fiddle with isn't exactly optimized for stressfull situations. A lightweight trigger will certainly help you discharge your gun accidentally, but I don't see how it will help much in a life or death situation.
Me too, what a letdown. Here I was hoping one of the big manufacturers had finally figured out how to do it!When I saw rail gun I thought of a magnetic accelerator.
Hollowpoints need speed to expand, .45's generally move slowly.It is not a fact; it is your supposition.
I'm sure it has nothing to do with our glorification of it, or its good looks. I do think it's probably the best choice for full size .45 carry, but like I said, once concealability is no longer an issue, there are less expensive, more reliable, higher capacity choices.And there is a reason a century old design is still around. It works, and works well.
That doesn't mean it's objectively superior to other designs.There are certain standards by which handguns are judged. In the realm of ergonomics and revolvers, it is the Colt SAA. With autos, it's the 1911.
And I seriously doubt that you'll notice the difference once the adrenaline kicks in.And I didn't say light weight trigger. I said great trigger, crisp, short, and with a quick reset. My SD 1911's have 4 1/2 - 6lb triggers. That's not light.
I didn't say that it was a huge problem, I said that it wasn't optimum.As far a the manual safety goes, it is a matter of training. Soldiers are expected to disengage their safety when needed, and do so without reported issues. Soldiers have been doing this for decades. Policeman have been doing this for decades. Surely this is not the problem you are making it out to be.
I'm not threatened at all, I honestly don't care what others use, I'm just defending my personal position. All of this has been about rails on an XSE, I said that I don't like rails on a 1911 because they work against the design's two best features, looks and concealability.Don't be threatened by other's choices. The OP wanted to discuss rails on an XSE, not your oppinion of 1911's.
Again, you need to check HST, God Dots, Sabers, and Rangers. These all seem to expand quiet well at low velocities.Hollowpoints need speed to expand, .45's generally move slowly.
The grip/angle has been copied by many successful recent designs - doubt it? Check out the HK45. Larry Vickers had the 1911 in mind when he made his suggestions. The 1911 is very viable.That doesn't mean it's objectively superior to other designs.
You are judging others by your standards.And I seriously doubt that you'll notice the difference once the adrenaline kicks in.
You wouldn't post such opinions, if you didn't care what others are using.I'm not threatened at all, I honestly don't care what others use, I'm just defending my personal position. All of this has been about rails on an XSE, I said that I don't like rails on a 1911 because they work against the design's two best features, looks and concealability.
I especially like that one.A good trigger feels like your dragging a cinder block across a gravel road-
But still, not objectively superior to other designs.The grip/angle has been copied by many successful recent designs - doubt it? Check out the HK45. Larry Vickers had the 1911 in mind when he made his suggestions. The 1911 is very viable.
No, I'm generalizing. Practically any imperfection in a gun can be overcome with adequate training, but that doesn't stop it from being an imperfection.You are judging others by your standards.
To me, practically any thread posted in an internet forum is an open invitation for someone to express their opinion. I personally like speaking my mind, even if it won't affect the views of anyone else. The fact that you're willing to attack my character by calling me a liar on top of your feiry defense of the 1911 as an HD gun makes you look a little fanatical.You wouldn't post such opinions, if you didn't care what others are using.