Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

New FN 308--FNAR

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by rallyhound, Dec 24, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. rallyhound

    rallyhound Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    291
    Location:
    Minnesota
  2. lipadj46

    lipadj46 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,884
    Well it is a short-stroke gas operated semi automatic rifle based on the BAR chambered in 7.62 Nato in a pistol grip stock with a built in picatinny rail. I am not sure of what your definition of a battle, hunting or target rifle is but the FNAR could probably be all three depending on the specific build.

    Here is a review from their website:

    http://www.fnhusa1.com/PDF/reviews/0810FNARshotgunnews.pdf
     
  3. hoosier8

    hoosier8 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Messages:
    160
    A rifle is a rifle and can be used for both.
     
  4. Coronach

    Coronach Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    11,109
    Looks more like a precision/target/hunting type seni-auto than a general purpose battle-rifle/tactical-gun. Yes, the definitions overlap, but there are differences between the two camps.
     
  5. Roadwild17

    Roadwild17 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,143
    Location:
    Undisclosed
    Possibally a DMR role on a battle field?
     
  6. TexasRifleman

    TexasRifleman Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    18,302
    Location:
    Ft. Worth
    Seems pretty clear they are marketing it for "tactical" use, but so far it does seem to be mostly that, marketing.

    Sounds like since they owned the BAR design someone thought "Hey, might as well make something out of that".

    If it used M14, FAL or G3 magazines I might be tempted, but I have no interest in taking on yet another magazine design.
     
  7. Deckard

    Deckard Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    282
    Location:
    The deep south of the far north.
    The lack of iron sights would discount it as a battle rifle in my book. In a combat situation you wouldn't want to be wholly dependent on your glass.
     
  8. Coronach

    Coronach Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    11,109
    yeah, but the "tactical" usage seems to be toward the precision side of things, not general-use tactical like a M4gery.

    Mike
     
  9. lipadj46

    lipadj46 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,884
    Read the article they are trying to compete directly with the M14/M21 DMR type rifles (intermediate-range semi auto sniper systems). I doubt anyone is going to try to come out with a 7.62 Nato based general use battle rifle these days.
     
  10. M1A National Match

    M1A National Match Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2008
    Messages:
    19
    I'd say this sums it all up rather nicely. Why in blue blazes the folks at FN decided to throw a new proprietary magazine into the mix is anyones guess, but, IMHO, it was a mistake. A big mistake.

    I examined one at the gun shop a short time ago, and found the rifle exceedingly heavy, and unbalanced, to boot. I would not care to heft one about in the woods, hunting. In short, I was not impressed. T'was a pity, as I'm generally a huge fan of FN products.
     
  11. NetJunkie

    NetJunkie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    224
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    You summed up my thoughts. First, why the new mag? Idiotic. Second, it is heavy and unbalanced. Felt like quality, but not something I'd pay that much for.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page