New Orleans Begins Confiscating Firearms (merged w/ "You're all gonna love this one")

Status
Not open for further replies.
Take this FWIW,(which may not be much)

a poster on FR states that his "contact" in NO says arms are only being taken from adandoned dwellings, and people carrying/brandishing on the street, and homeowners are being allowed to keep theirs. If true, its still sickening. But it doesn't square up with the video and other accounts. Then there's the whole camera thing. :scrutiny: :confused:
 
Can we wake from this nightmare, now we see the Iraqui training ground clearly, and the Federalization on NG troops is automatic. I was a long time disparager of the tinfoil hat bridage, but clear evidence is darn hard to ignore. Something tells me these reporters were one of two things - aberrations, who wern't supposed to see this, or, much more likely, the straw men, to see the reaction from the nation to this tyoe of event. The government is watching these events from both sides of the TV...
 
"When you get 15 M-16s pointed at you and they line you up against the wall, it's kind of scary," said Guidos, 55.

Remember, as I have stated numerous times on this and other boards, the police/military are there to protect the power structure, not individual citizens. This is even admitted in the various court rulings on the subject if you care to read them.

Thus, when the power structure feels threatened, the very LAST thing to be considered is the rights of individual citizens -- instead, any and all actions needed to insure the survival of government will be taken, and to Hell with what is right or not. It WILL be made legal somehow, either through interpretation of existing law or creation of new law, or simply paying off some loud mouths.

I marvel at those who still believe in anything else. Maybe what is going on in N.O. will finally convince some of them.
 
Obviously, if you're of a mind to start a revolution, that means trashing the current rules under which you work. The Redcoats doubtless had the legal authority, under English law, to do what they were doing. We decided we no longer wanted to be under English law.

Are we deciding that now? Think carefully about the answer.

Coronach,

The problem here is that the government is ignoring the law. We, as Americans, do not want to overthrow the law, we want it enforced (all of it, especially the limits to government powers).

Saying that we must follow a corrupt government because disobeying a corrupt government is unlawful is a non sequitur.
 
Yeah, I'm sure this group is unarmed. But what about the next bunch... or the next... or the next? Being killed by a thousand tiny cuts is no different than being drawn and quartered... in the end.

Who cares about the Mexicans? THE MEXICANS ARE NOT DISARMING PEOPLE--OUR OWN LEO'S ARE!! The DOD troops aren't even involved in it. The New Orleans PD, along with the outside JBT's they've brought in, are the ones attacking the remaining people.

THE SAME POLICE DEPARTMENT THAT FELL APART AND RAN AWAY WHEN TROUBLE STARTED IS NOW RETURNING TO ATTACK THE FEW CIVILIANS WHO REMAIN!

This is the fruition of the "sheepdog" school of thought--that cops are distinct from civilians and there is a "war" on the streets.
 
P.S.

I wouldn't be surprised if the "Instant Background Check" system went down (inexplicably) preventing firearms sales nationwide. Remember the freeze on sales during the L.A. riots.
 
Yeah so much for the distinction between wolves and sheepdogs. I have had a sneaking suspcion that the only difference between a sheep and a wolf is whether or not you have weapons and the will to use them. The only difference between a sheepdog and a wolf is self-discipline.
 
To my knowledge, this is the first time in modern American history that a sizable, ostensibly law-abiding population has been criminalized by decree, forcibly disarmed, and removed from their property.

Maybe it's the first time in the past decade, but it's by no means unprecedented. Most Native Americans, citizens of Japanese ancestory during WWII, blacks during slavery and Jim Crow, the underclass in most modern American cities. It's the same old pattern. In order to control you must first disarm.
 
THE SAME POLICE DEPARTMENT THAT FELL APART AND RAN AWAY WHEN TROUBLE STARTED IS NOW RETURNING TO ATTACK THE FEW CIVILIANS WHO REMAIN!

Amazing how they couldn't (wouldn't) go in when there were people who NEEDED protection from the thugs roaming the streets terrorizing people with guns. Now that the storm is passed, they are showing us how tough they are by disarming law-abiding citizens. :fire:
 
The antis are having a great time with this one over at the Baltimore Sun:

Link

Seems that they think that now that these people are "law breakers" since they didn't leave when ordered, that they deserve to have their firearms taken.
 
To my knowledge, this is the first time in modern American history that a sizable, ostensibly law-abiding population has been criminalized by decree, forcibly disarmed, and removed from their property.

Phone for you sir, its an American Indian. There is a black guy on line 2 and a bunch of Polish guys from Michigan on line 3.
 
Seems that they think that now that these people are "law breakers" since they didn't leave when ordered, that they deserve to have their firearms taken.

I agree as long they are taken into custody, their personal safety then the responsibility of the police. But you can't just take a man's guns and walk away saying "have a nice day".
 
But that's exactly what they are doing... Disarming the people and letting them stay.... Not taking them into custody.

:cuss: :fire:

May the constitution RIP.... And may Jefferson stop spinning in his grave.
 
This is new information.

I can't say who I got this from, but this needs to be known.

The reason that they are confiscating guns, as briefed to the National Guard down there, is that the officials want the city cleared. Some people just won't leave. So they are being disarmed in the hopes that this will force them to leave, because now they will be scared of the criminals and looters.

Let me repeat that. As I was informed by somebody in position to be briefed on the tactics in use, the people that are not evacuating are doing so at this point because they were prepared and armed. Once disarmed they will not be able to defend themselves from the bad guys and will have no choice but to leave.

If your state has National Guard in New Orleans, contact your Governor's office and ask them if they know what THEIR troops are being ordered to do.
 
I wonder what you other ex-military folks think of the oath we took:
"...to defend the Constitution from all enemies foreign and DOMESTIC"
 
I got a response from the NRA. I'm not happy.

Thank you for contacting the NRA-ILA. Numerous media sources are reporting on an apparent campaign by New Orleans city authorities to confiscate lawfully-owned firearms from people in the city. Louisiana statute does grant the government, during a state of emergency, broad powers in regulating and controlling firearms.

However, we have seen not just with Hurricane Katrina, but other similar situations, that when police are unable to control the criminal element, people turn to the one freedom that protects all others-the Second Amendment.

While one can certainly understand the dire predicaments of all those affected by Hurricane Katrina, as we have learned throughout history, campaigns to disarm the lawful do nothing to disarm the criminal. And in truth, these restrictions make citizens less safe. Despite the valiant efforts of many law enforcement officers and rescue workers, too many of those left in the wake of Katrina are ultimately responsible for their own security and safety and that of their families and loved ones; especially when communication is virtually non-existent and police can't be quickly summoned to respond to calls for help. At these times, lawful gun ownership is paramount to personal safety.

Of course, the entire situation in New Orleans is constantly in flux. But rest assured NRA is monitoring this situation very closely and will address any activity by the government that unduly infringes upon the rights of lawful gun owners at the appropriate time. As we learn more, we will report to our members accordingly. In the interim, however, we join with all Americans in offering our thoughts, prayers, and assistance to the victims and survivors of this terrible natural disaster.

Sincerely,

Amanda Millward
 
Okay, I'm lost here,

Why is the city being cleared?
I've understood that parts of the city still have elctrical power, is that an incorrect statement?

If these homeowners survived the storm and looters, why are they not able to stay?

And why the confiscation of camera's and videocam's?

I've never been to New Orleans so I don't know the lay of the land. Do they plan on bulldozing the city? Sanitizing it with spraying aircraft or what?

Are the levees in danger of bursting again?

Vick
 
Just got off the phone with the Governor's office here in Georgia. It is the position of Governor Sonny Perdue's administration that if the Georgia National Guard Troops are ordered to confiscate firearms from law abiding citizens, in direct violation of the 2nd Amendment, that's just hunky dory with him. I quote the interesting portion of the conversation here:

Sir, if that is what they are charged with, then that is what they will do.

Me: You are aware of the issue of those rights being protected by the US Constitution?

Sir, the situation warrants extreme measures.

Me: This is the position of the Governor?

 
Remember, as I have stated numerous times on this and other boards, the police/military are there to protect the power structure, not individual citizens. This is even admitted in the various court rulings on the subject if you care to read them.

Thus, when the power structure feels threatened, the very LAST thing to be considered is the rights of individual citizens -- instead, any and all actions needed to insure the survival of government will be taken, and to Hell with what is right or not. It WILL be made legal somehow, either through interpretation of existing law or creation of new law, or simply paying off some loud mouths.

I marvel at those who still believe in anything else. Maybe what is going on in N.O. will finally convince some of them.


First, I would greatly appreciate links to rulings stating that about protecting the power structure.

Second, there must be SOME effort to protect the power structure/government, else things would decay quickly into anarchy.

Did you see the remake of War of the Worlds? That's what I'm thinking could very easily happen, and in fact it sounds like scenes like that have already played out down there.

Of course I am not advocating nor approving of any infringements of rights/liberties, just saying that some steps must be taken to ensure that there is a power structure intact for obvious reasons of providing relief to the victims.
 
So if disarming is done in the name of safety, isn't this placing the homeowners in jeopardy?

NRA seems a bit limp as does Mr. Perdue. What do they know we don't?

What assumptions are they making?

Puzzled.

Vick
 
This is new information.

I can't say who I got this from, but this needs to be known.

The reason that they are confiscating guns, as briefed to the National Guard down there, is that the officials want the city cleared. Some people just won't leave. So they are being disarmed in the hopes that this will force them to leave, because now they will be scared of the criminals and looters.

Let me repeat that. As I was informed by somebody in position to be briefed on the tactics in use, the people that are not evacuating are doing so at this point because they were prepared and armed. Once disarmed they will not be able to defend themselves from the bad guys and will have no choice but to leave.

If your state has National Guard in New Orleans, contact your Governor's office and ask them if they know what THEIR troops are being ordered to do.


Thanks for the info.

A question for anyone who cares to answer: WHY is the city being cleared? WHY are people being FORCED to leave?

Are they going to nuke/bulldoze the city or something?

If people want to stay and take their chances, who is the govt. to say otherwise???

Oh, I guess it is all for your own good, right? :rolleyes: :banghead: :fire:
 
But rest assured NRA is monitoring this situation very closely and will address any activity by the government that unduly infringes upon the rights of lawful gun owners at the appropriate time

Wonder how long that will take...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top