New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg on CBS
- Thread starter Sky
- Start date
- Status
tyeo098
Member
Whoa whoa whoa.
I live in Virginia. ("The Old Dominion State...")
The only reason I can vouch for NY laws is because we have a second home in NY on 36 acres, and where I plan to build my own 100yd range.
But yes, AWB'94 applies. Pre-ban mags are OK. Pre-ban rifles can have all the evil features they want. Post-ban rifles must be neutered and post-ban mags must either be <=10rds or rendered to only accept <=10rds.
rm23
Member
tyeo098
Member
Specs?
Going by the looks of it,
You have a comp perm. fixed to the muzzle (i.e no thread barrel or FH)
Your stock it fixed in THAT position only. (IF its adjustable, and I'm not familiar with that stock)
And I see no bayonet lug on your FSB.
NYS allows you to have 1 evil feature and the only evil feature you chose to keep was the pistol grip.
Neutered.
mljdeckard
Member
People are still listening to him.
Deltaboy1984
Member
The Mayor is with his statements proven he is a MOTHO!
rm23
Member
It's a KAC SR15 with a triple tap muzzle brake and a Magpul PRS. The length and height of the stock are adjustable.
bushmaster1313
Member
Didn't Bobby Knight get into big trouble saying something like that?
Ahh, so you've got that "shoulder thingy that goes up." DA Rice of Nassau would be interested in the adjustable length.
Unfortunately, I have to live by the same rules as you.....and they are ridiculous.
Bloomberg said: "wait a second: let me find the gun. Where did I put the ammunition? Where did I put the key?"
I wonder how long it takes him to get dressed in the morning with his toothbrush, shaving kit, pants, jacket, and tie strewn randomly around his house.
But seriously, I think the above illustrates how rights can be eroded by degrees until they are effectively and then actually taken away.
First get people to store ALL of their ammo (including defensive rounds) clear across the house in a separately locked container, and then tell people that home defense is therefore impractical, so nobody should be allowed to own guns at all because they're useless except for committing crimes. This tactic could theoretically work against any right. Sneaky!
I wonder how long it takes him to get dressed in the morning with his toothbrush, shaving kit, pants, jacket, and tie strewn randomly around his house.
But seriously, I think the above illustrates how rights can be eroded by degrees until they are effectively and then actually taken away.
First get people to store ALL of their ammo (including defensive rounds) clear across the house in a separately locked container, and then tell people that home defense is therefore impractical, so nobody should be allowed to own guns at all because they're useless except for committing crimes. This tactic could theoretically work against any right. Sneaky!That guy is a serious idiot. I had a carry in NYC, when I sold my buisness, I had to turn in my permit , metioned several times before here, I left the stat and moved to FL. After 22 years of carrying 24/7, you are expected to just stop and give up your guns. That is why I say watch out for these guys, like Obama, and Bloomberg, they have plans for us. We need to remove Obama or as a lame Duck pres, he will take away our rights piece by piece.Starting with appointing 2 more supremes who are on his side as far as our rights and the rights of govt. It is a critical time.
ErikO
Member
Looking at NDAA '11 I'm more concerned with Congress selling us further down the river.
Heck, I am a Liberal and thoughts of Mikey Bloomberg staying in politics annoys the poop out of me. Considering the federal laws he has broken with his "stings" he should have been locked up by now.
Heck, I am a Liberal and thoughts of Mikey Bloomberg staying in politics annoys the poop out of me. Considering the federal laws he has broken with his "stings" he should have been locked up by now.
Carl N. Brown
Member
My revolver is in a holster on the night stand. My ammunition is in the revolver. The key to my gun cabinet is secured in. well, a secure place.
Locally home/business invasion murderers were armed with gun, knife or baseball bat, home invasion burglars who didn't have a chance to kill were armed with screwdriver, superior brute force, etc. (How come Bloomberg's burglars all have guns?) It does not take a gun to put a reasonable person in fear of imminent death or greivous bodily harm justifying use of a gun in self defense. Most self-defense against burglary around here is chase-off through brandishment-only, followed by detention at gun point for arrest by responding officer, occasionally a shot fired (miss or warning) and recently one serious but nonfatal wounding. We did have two double murders of people in their homes, involving drugs, where the victims had guns inaccessible. It's a mixed bag, perhaps, but several successful defenses overall.
Defenders should have a choice whether to have agun or not. Bloomberg would want the defenders serving 3.5 years in Sing Sing.
People resent patriarchal plutocratic New York (as an impersonal abstract) bashing everyone else in its arrogance.
New York gun control advocates have been trying to push for a federally imposed national Sullivan Act for decades.
http://www.thegunzone.com/rkba/rkba-25.html
H. L. Mencken, "The Uplifters Try It Again", Baltimore Sun, 30 Nov 1925.
Madison Avenue advertising executive Carl Bakal in No Right to Bear Arms claimed a ban on civilian guns was constitutional because the Second Amendment protected only state militias, disregarding any argument that the constitutions of several states guarantee their citizens a right to keep and bear arms, and if the Second Amendment was only about states, the language would have been "power and authority of the state" rather than "right of the people" shall not be infringed.
Don't take it personal, the resentment is mostly toward the Tim Sullivans, Chuck Schumers, Carl Bakals and Mike Bloomergs.
Last edited:
bushmaster1313
Member
The Supreme Court made fun of the attorney for D.C. in the Heller case, I think it was Dellinger, who maintained that a locked gun in the home satisfied the right to keep and bear arms. One of the Justices asked him something like, "okay got to find the key but first I need to find my glasses."
Here it is:
Last edited:
SleazyRider
Member
Good stuff. I shot my snowblower with it many years ago. Out of anger. Or maybe revenge.
GambJoe
Member
Bloomberg is in the process of putting security cameras on every corner of the city. He will no doubt deploy the latest and exprimental profiling software to identify potential gun carriers. Potential gun carriers will then be stopped before they commit a future crime.
So you're better off without a gun.
So you're better off without a gun.
ol' scratch
Member
I like him just fine...In New York. If he is busy playing mayor in New York City, he is less likely to try and spread his fanaticism all over the country. Every time he has tried, he has failed miserably. The guy is a raging loony.
When I moved back to PA (I still work so I get NYS Non-resident taxes), one thing I was immensely happy about was not having to pay NYC wage tax to fund him anymore. I don't hate New York City or a lot of things funded by taxes (the ETA times for subways is nice), but it was a decent chunk of my wife and my pay...but it all can't go to useful things.
I had some on Facebook spout that stuff. I politely and calmly corrected him on that and other gun control myths (hi-cap) and soon those issues dropped to just the whole Zimmerman matter, along with an open offer to take him shooting anytime its on the East Coast.
Airborne Falcon
Member
Seems appropriate ...
Mousegun
Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2005
- Messages
- 738
One thing I can't understand about this guy.
I lived in NYC for a few years and then N.J. for many more. I escaped to Tn.
Many of my friends were of the Jewish persuasion and I learned a lot about the tribulations they went through during WW11 and beyond. There is a common phrase among them, "never again" and I can certainly understand why.
Bloomers, who is Jewish, either forgot, doesn't believe or doesn't care about past history and chooses to take a stance on self protection that is not only stupid but down right morally wrong.
If NYC and other large cities would somehow allow their citizens the right of self protection with a firearm, there may be a period of learning but it would work itself out.
I lived in NYC for a few years and then N.J. for many more. I escaped to Tn.
Many of my friends were of the Jewish persuasion and I learned a lot about the tribulations they went through during WW11 and beyond. There is a common phrase among them, "never again" and I can certainly understand why.
Bloomers, who is Jewish, either forgot, doesn't believe or doesn't care about past history and chooses to take a stance on self protection that is not only stupid but down right morally wrong.
If NYC and other large cities would somehow allow their citizens the right of self protection with a firearm, there may be a period of learning but it would work itself out.
1911Tuner
Moderator Emeritus
Seems like every time he opens his mouth, he becomes more inconsequential. I gotta wonder if he's taken leave of his senses. No, really!
JFrame
Member
I guess there's something to be said for keeping all the statists in concentrated areas, where they can ravage themselves to their hearts' content, and leave rational people alone.
Unfortunately, statists tend to disperse like locusts, swarming new fields to try and apply their cockamamie social engineering schemes.
.
SleazyRider
Member
No, it was stone cold dead. My purpose in shooting it was not only to make me feel better; but so I wouldn't be tempted to patch it up and tinker with it for the umpteenth time to no avail. I was throwing good money after bad, because I am such a cheapskate.
It was a violent act, but one that I do not regret.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
